School Reorganisation: Is The Money Still Available? (Updated)

We’ve been hearing unconfirmed whispers that the reorganisation of the schools – removing the Middle School level and replacing it with a two-tier system – might not have the money available to it that was first pledged by the Isle of Wight council.

School Reorganisation: Is The Money Still Available?If this is the case – and we hasten to underline, it hasn’t been confirmed – we’re wondering how small/large the impact might be, or where it would impact.

At the end of November, the papers for the Cabinet meeting raised the issue of the School Reorganisation being removed from the council’s priority list. Due to the lengthy discussions of budget cuts, the meeting finished before the item was considered.

David Pugh’s response
We’ve written to the Cabinet member in charge of the school reorganisation – council leader, David Pugh – but at the time of running this story, we haven’t heard back from him.

UPDATE: 16:56 This just received from David Pugh – Ed

School reorganisation remains a corporate priority until such time as the change is fully implemented.

The project will be fully delivered within the capital resources we have available to us.

It should be noted that schools revenue budgets (funded from the Dedicated Schools Grant) will face a number of pressures next year, as they will across the country. Operating within a wholly two-tier structure from next September will mean that these funds are spent as effectively as possible. The local authority will support schools – including the new providers – in this process.

Image: CECOM PAO under CC BY 2.0

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
21 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Conrad
15, December 2010 5:12 pm

Budgets are going down – fact
Extra money – not available – fact

Haulage Bob
15, December 2010 5:18 pm

The roads PFI will go the same way – FACT.

All the money paid out so far, wasted – FACT.

John of Gaunt
Reply to  Haulage Bob
16, December 2010 2:18 pm

Ahh, all this talk of PFI, debt etc has allowed be to think of what my friend lamented back in 1595. “This royal throne of kings, this scepter’d isle, This earth of majesty, this seat of Mars, This other Eden, demi-paradise, This fortress built by Nature for herself Against infection and the hand of war, This happy breed of men, this little world, This precious stone set… Read more »

Steephill Jack
15, December 2010 6:00 pm

It’s difficult to tell whether Pugh is saying it WILL happen or it just might NOT happen, depending.
But we know they will do the best they can to achieve this priority. He’s very good at this kind of explanation: he should go far.

mojo
Reply to  Steephill Jack
15, December 2010 7:05 pm

Preferably as far as possible!! Can he take Steve B with him as well??

Meursault
15, December 2010 6:24 pm

Here is my interpretation 1. ‘School reorganisation remains a corporate priority until such time as the change is fully implemented.’ – meaning it will stay on the list of objectives until it is carried out – which could be this year or in 10 years time. Strange statement to make really???? 2. ‘The project will be fully delivered within the capital resources we have available to us.’… Read more »

nominative determinism
Reply to  Meursault
15, December 2010 6:33 pm

well… he clearly states too that 2 tier will happen from next september. he also states that the project will be fully delivered within the cut down council budget – presumably meaning money will be spent on this rather than other things Why, just because its David Pugh and the council, do people assume that they have to read between the lines? Maybe, just maybe, he still… Read more »

Meursault
Reply to  nominative determinism
15, December 2010 6:47 pm

If they explained in plain english then there would be no confusion or misinterpretation. – same with the explanation of cuts over the past couple of days. I would still argue that he has included enough ambiguity through certain phrasing to allow room to maneuver. Communicate clearly and it is easy to take someone at face value. Provide ambiguous statements and you leave yourself open to misinterpretation.… Read more »

No.5
Reply to  nominative determinism
15, December 2010 10:29 pm

Well I’m completely in favour of a two tier system…however I have no doubt that Pugh can deliver it competantly, no faith that they will do so to the betterment of Island education and detest the playground tactics of spoilt children used to obtain the change.

L PINKERTON
Reply to  Meursault
15, December 2010 7:19 pm

The published proposals have a timetable which has to be observed or re-advertised. There were enough loop-holes in the published notices to be to get away with the majority of problems which might exist to see off any legal challenges. The notices were pretty vague after all.

Martin william Wareham
Reply to  Meursault
16, December 2010 9:22 am

It’s already taken eight years why rush

L PINKERTON
Reply to  Martin william Wareham
16, December 2010 11:29 am

Under Education Law they now have to ‘rush’ to meet their advertised dates.

Wendy V
15, December 2010 7:59 pm

The obvious aspect of the reorganisation money that’s missing is the Building Schools for the Future funding, which has been ditched by the government before any was allocated to the Isle of Wight. So funds for those shiny new secondary school buildings that were promised when the whole reorganisation was proposed are not there (apart from for Cowes, which already had its pot of rebuild money assigned… Read more »

DP
Reply to  Wendy V
15, December 2010 8:25 pm

Wel, here we go again. The council promised us the earth when they pushed for the two tier system. They promised us that the money for the new builds was “ring fenced” so our shiny new schools were definitely going ahead. Now it looks as though they have gone back on their word YET AGAIN! Its our children who will suffer – using mobile classrooms and being… Read more »

L PINKERTON
Reply to  DP
16, December 2010 11:38 am

Bobbie Dylan Approximately?

JC
16, December 2010 12:13 pm

Typical political nonsense speak as usual. Yes or no would be sufficient. My eldest daughter is in Middle School at the moment so I’m particularly concerned about the impending chaos these changes are going to bring. And “ring fenced” annoys me immensely as does most other management speak. Surely “protected” is perfectly adequate? (I’m not having a go at you DP, I know you were quoting) All… Read more »

No One
16, December 2010 5:14 pm

The 2 tier system will be in place in September. For various reasons there is no other option, than for this to happen. As Wendy said, the shortfall will be in the budget for new buildings/renovating the old ones, not for the reorganisation itself.

Chris
17, December 2010 12:57 pm

Just how many mobile classrooms will the islan need? Diabolical

Sally Perry
Admin
Reply to  Chris
17, December 2010 1:16 pm

We asked that question in January and were told that the council currently had 89 mobile classrooms and would be procuring a further 12.

That figure may have changed significantly since then after the Building Schools for the Future fund was scrapped by the government

peter
17, December 2010 4:17 pm

The much maligned Tony Flower said in 2005 that all the mobile classrooms on the Island would be gone within a year. I wonder what he thinks now when the things now litter the Island, thats progress for you, our kids educated in mobile clasrooms for the sake of dogma. What matters in any organisation, business or school, is the person who runs it and their leadership… Read more »

WIGHTEDUCATE
20, December 2010 12:01 am

If you look at the planning online section of the Isle of Wight Council, these mobile classrooms had to be advertised.

How many people objected to them?

And there is the presumption that these are temporary.

But how long is a piece of string?

Will they still be in use in 40 years’ time?

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined