Speedway: Heavy Defeat For Wightlink Islanders

Thanks to Bryn for this update from the Wightlink Islanders. Condolences to the Islanders and a speedy recovery for those with injuries. Ed

Gary CothamIt certainly wasn’t a weekend to remember for the Wightlink Islanders – more like a weekend to forget and in a hurry!

The first blow to hit them came with the shock announcement on Saturday from reserve Danny Stoneman that he had decided to retire from the sport.

Despite efforts to persuade him to the contrary, he would not be swayed and that left our promotional duo of Chris Hunt and Kevin Shepherd desperately trying to find a replacement and a replacement who could ride in the National League match at Mildenhall yesterday (Sunday) afternoon!

Berwick steps forward
Thankfully Dan Berwick, who started the season at Stoke, agreed to deputise but to have to do so at such short notice was hardly ideal for either club or rider.

Undeterred though, the island side took to the Suffolk circuit and it all went wrong from heat four onwards.

Broken collarbone for Cottham
The home side led 14-10 going into the fifth race but at the first attempt to run it, home rider Josh Bates and Wightlink Islander Gary Cottham (who had won heat two impressively) fell at the first bend.

Both got to their feet but, alas, the latter suffered a shoulder injury – suspected broken collarbone – and took no further part in the match.

Nor did Berwick after heat 8 which saw him take his fourth ride in the match by that stage and having scored just one point. With machinery problems and falls for skipper Danny Warwick and top scorer Aaron Baseby too, the Wightlink Islanders will not wish to be reminded of what was a miserable Sunday in Suffolk from their point of view!

Following x-rays at his local hospital in Pembury, Kent, it has been confirmed that Wightlink Islander’s very much in-form reserve Gary Cottham sustained a broken right collarbone as a result of the crash.

Scores
MILDENHALL 63 WIGHTLINK ISLANDERS 30!
ISLANDERS SCORERS: Aaron Baseby 9, Danny Warwick 8, Ben Hopwood 4, Kyle Hughes 3, Gary Cottham 3, Paul Starke 2+1, Dan Berwick 1.

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
0 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
susan pamela mawhood
26, June 2014 8:23 pm

Thank you so much Seb,I love living on our beautiful island and your vidio confirms its stunning beauty

John Nash
26, June 2014 8:25 pm

A good proportion of the lovely views in this video will be wrecked if the Navitus Bay proposal is given consent. Of more than two thousand eight hundred “representions” made to the Planning Inspectorate, who will be examining the scheme, only about 6 are from Island residents. The rest are from Dorset residents. Why the disparity? Are Islanders simply Holier than Thou, gullible, apathetic, or just plain… Read more »

yjciow
27, June 2014 2:21 pm

@John Nash. Your comment is totally 100% accurate (naive, gullible and apathetic) ((I’m allowed to say that as I am an islander and have first hand experience of all three!)). The Isle of Wight will be wrecked by Navitus Bay – so many people In the West Wight do not realise that they will have their peace shattered. Bournemouth Council have been very active against this proposal… Read more »

bigEars
27, June 2014 6:17 pm

You have to wonder why anybody would seriously consider putting up a silly alternative energy wind farm when we can get all the energy we need by fracking the hell out of the Island instead. Better still, we could cover the Island in solar cells. Or how about a nice nuclear power station? Or a tidal wave barrier (obviously as long as it doesn’t effect the local… Read more »

Caconym
28, June 2014 11:19 am

When a wind farm story appears on the IWCP website, the comments soon fill with anti wind power comments, the authors of which reply in the most obnoxious and objectionable ways should anyone dare to suggest that they don’t really mind wind turbines (not even “support”, merely not object). It is gratifying to see the down-votes awarded to John Nash who, like those on the IWCP, resorts… Read more »

John Nash
Reply to  Caconym
28, June 2014 4:46 pm

My “just plain stupid” remark was, to be sure,ill-tempered and unkind, and was prompted by my sheer disbelief at the lack of submissions (both for and against Navitus Bay) to the Planning Inspectorate. I will not retract my other remarks because they can be shown to be true. And I would add “naive” and ill-informed” to that list. It is no good trumpeting how beautiful the Island… Read more »

kevin1746
Reply to  John Nash
28, June 2014 5:07 pm

Your essentials are not the same as others essentials…I like my lights to go on when I throw the switch and I would like to be responsible for the power that I use, not siphon it off from someone else. I completely support wind farms, Navitus Bay, Tidal and wave generators, thermal and geo thermal and even Nucleur. We have to have alternatives now and no matter… Read more »

Cynic
Reply to  kevin1746
29, June 2014 11:51 am

…. and fracking as well Kevin?

Steve Goodman
Reply to  John Nash
29, June 2014 11:02 am

JN – Where were you & your friends during the decade of decay at Frank James? Could you even have been around when the E.Cowes Castle home of the real John Nash was neglected & demolished? Do you litter pick, or beach clean? Do you clear Himalayan balsam & other invaders? Do you cut back growth spreading on to our foot & cycle paths? Do you plant… Read more »

John Nash
Reply to  Steve Goodman
29, June 2014 1:22 pm

As far as I know I am real. I do not hide behind a pseudonym. Some of my “environmental” credentials are as follows: 1. I have never owned or driven a car or any other motorised vehicle. 2. Since a very young age I have detested rampant consumerism. I regard this as a perversion of the human spirit. 3. I have only ever flown on a long… Read more »

Steve Goodman
Reply to  John Nash
30, June 2014 11:21 am

John; looking at what you wrote, we have a lot in common, & I’m sorry that we are currently unable to agree on the need to allow temporary or permanent wind turbines in places we value. I am also sorry that the wording I used didn’t allow for the possibility that you hadn’t used as a pseudonym the name of the famous former island resident. Coincidentally, I… Read more »

Caconym
Reply to  John Nash
29, June 2014 12:00 pm

You think the best way to convince the undecided and ambivalent over to your point of view is to hurl insults at them?

Generally the opposite is true. Tell someone who is sitting on the fence that they are “stupid” and “naive” because they don’t believe as you do and they will almost always come out in complete opposition to you.

Tanja Rebel
29, June 2014 11:34 am

I think we can all agree that energy conservation needs to be the Island’s top priority. In conjunction with that we need good renewable energy sources and I think that the Isle of Wight is ideally placed for solar and tidal energy schemes. With regards to off-shore wind, if this is put in a responsible position then it can contribute too. The currently proposed position is too… Read more »

Tanja Rebel
30, June 2014 6:41 pm

The wind farm will be far less of a threat to our Coastal Heritage if it is put further out to sea. The Developers had that option, but chose the spot nearest to the coast. This is understandable from a cost-perspective, but – as stated – we need to balance our insatiable thirst for ever more energy against the (timeless) value of our Heritage. If we put… Read more »

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined