dark road under street light

StreetSafe: New online tool allows women and girls to pinpoint areas where they feel unsafe

The Home Office has launched StreetSafe, an online tool that enables people, particularly women and girls, to pin-point locations where they feel or have felt unsafe.

Donna Jones, Police and Crime Commissioner said,

“Violence against women and girls can have a devastating impact on victims and survivors, their friends and family, witnesses, and wider society.

“We know that additional police patrols can help people feel safe and prevent crime and that is why my main priority as Police and Crime Commissioner is to increase police numbers and visibility. But it takes more than just extra officers to make us feel safe.

“Having somewhere people can provide information on places that don’t feel safe, and what makes those locations feel unsafe, will help us to build a picture of what the issues are and to identify the measures we need to take.

“Information recorded on StreetSafe could help organisations such as police, councils and transport providers to take action that will prevent crime, be that reducing shrubbery to provide better sight lines, installing extra lighting or putting on a new night bus.

“The more information we have, the more effective policing and other services can be in preventing crime and targeting offenders. I would encourage people across Hampshire and the Isle of Wight to make use of StreetSafe tool.”

StreetSafe is part of the government’s strategy to tackle Violence Against Women and Girls (VAWG). It is not a means for reporting crime to the police.

To give information on areas you feel are unsafe visit the Website.


News shared by the office of the Police and Crime Commissioner, in their own words. Ed

Image: Amber Kipp under CC BY 2.0

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
0 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Cynic
21, May 2012 6:53 pm

Another example of the fine art of the bureaucratic two-step to aid a “Preferred Bidder”.

Are we really to believe that the Preferred Bidder would go away from this juicy contract if there was a delay?

This is just another version of the old sales ploy “If you don’t buy it now, the price will go up!” used by doorstep salesmen the world over!

Chris Wilmott
21, May 2012 7:32 pm

Why don’t these people speak English? Can it be because they don’t want to be understood? There was once a Plain English movement, but clearly it has yet to affect the Council’s petty bureaucrats.

James P
Reply to  Chris Wilmott
22, May 2012 8:56 am

Agree entirely. You just know that when they use words like ‘disapplication’ that there’s a fudge involved. Why not just say it’s cancelled?

Ryde a Wight Swan
Reply to  Chris Wilmott
22, May 2012 9:13 am

Beware of any intiative that talks about “engineering solutions” or anyone who says “going forward”.

Steve Goodman
22, May 2012 8:59 am

For those who may have missed it, the proposed change to a discredited PFI road maintenance contract for 25 years is not yet a certainty. As I said to those responsible, in the days when it was still possible to ask awkward questions at public council meetings, when will this council start taking it’s duty to taxpayers seriously? Why should only a few here today, gone tomorrow… Read more »

Cynic
22, May 2012 9:34 am

I wonder what the National Audit Office’s view would be on a multi-million, 25 years contract being decided by “Delegated Decision” and avoiding scrutiny?

One notes that the “Business Plan” was not attached to the “disapplication” (sic!) decision.

daveq
Reply to  Cynic
22, May 2012 11:28 am

Telescope to blind eye job?

Island Monkey
22, May 2012 12:45 pm

This report clearly says ‘submit the final business case to the Department of Transport.’ Does this mean this is not yet a done deal, despite the previous claims of the council?

Steve Goodman
Reply to  Island Monkey
22, May 2012 2:54 pm

Yes.

playingthenumbers
22, May 2012 1:10 pm

A £1bn project, paid for by taxation & borrowing. Then more taxation to pay for the borrowing, more cuts to things like education or health & more disposal of assets whose revenue cannot keep pace with the repayments demanded of the taxation & borrowing. For what? Is it within the purview of any of the elected members to explain how, in the modern world this project can… Read more »

Paul Miller
Reply to  playingthenumbers
22, May 2012 1:53 pm

The concept of odious debt [which is repudiated later because it is deemed taken on without consent] – much like of vaunted ‘PFI’ is described in the case of Greece in the excellent documentary “Debtrocracy”

playingthenumbers
Reply to  playingthenumbers
6, June 2012 10:59 am

Does the chancellor of the exchequer read VB? The headline in the Independent online today ‘Osborne’s latest plan: ask Britain’s savers for money’ Treasury to fund infrastructure projects by selling us ‘growth bonds’ suggest he might. If we recalibrate the PFI deal, strip out the ridiculous finance costs the provider (us eventually) will have to stump up, bring the project back to something approaching excitingly large but… Read more »

adrian nicholas
22, May 2012 3:00 pm

Cynic said; This is just another version of the old sales ploy “If you don’t buy it now, the price will go up!” used by doorstep salesmen the world over! Well in this case, i’ll wager the price will go up regardless. Another case of neo-liberalist profiteering using private leveraged debt subsidized by public debt to ensures trebles all round for those involved in this ‘project’. Makes… Read more »

Cynic
22, May 2012 3:15 pm

Having run major multimillion projects in my former professional life, I know two things from experience. Firstly, central and local government are incapable of defining the project tightly enough, leading to inevitable contract changes that always increase the price. In fact, the negotiating strategy of some companies is to win the public service contract with a low price, knowing full well that they can make up the… Read more »

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined