The George Food hygiene report form - Sept 2015

The George given zero for food hygiene: We have inspector’s report and The George’s reaction

Earlier in the week, OnTheWight carried an Isle of Wight council press release highlighting the latest Food Standards Agency (FSA) ratings for businesses on the Island.

Despite the great news that 90% of establishments received either four or five out of five ratings, there were five establishments that received zero ratings for food hygiene.

One such business being Yarmouth hotel, The George.

CP report “paperwork error”
The Isle of Wight County Press’ coverage of the news opened with,

A PAPERWORK error proved to be a recipe for disaster at The George Hotel in Yarmouth, when it landed them with a Food Standards Agency rating of zero.

Keen to determine exactly what errors in the paperwork would have led to a zero hygiene rating, OnTheWight sought a copy of the report (see below).

Inspection report
Inspections are carried out by Isle of Wight council Environmental Health Officers (EHO) and the report is a snapshot at the time of the inspection. The George told OnTheWight today (Thursday), “We now have a clean bill of health”.

It The report shows the inspection was carried out on 10th September 2015 between 11:15am and 1:30pm.

The eight points
The eight points raised by the EHO inspector that needed addressing were:

  1. HACCP Assessment (what’s this?) needed for Sous Vide operation
  2. Relocate cooked vacuum packer – to clean area away from dirty equipment and raw machine
  3. Temporary repair of ceiling needed above cooking range
  4. Ensure storage methods – reduce risk of contamination
  5. Ensure stock rotation system adhered to
  6. Cleanliness – more detailed cleaning needed
  7. Replace broken fryer basket as several pieces of metal missing
  8. Ensure regular hand-washing is undertaken

The George Food hygiene report form - Sept 2015 - Bottom

The council explained that since the report was issued, a re-visit has taken place and “improvements have been made ahead of a re-inspection” (difference between a re-visit and re-inspection explained).

The George: “We now have a clean bill of health”
OnTheWight got in touch with The George for their side of the things, and Sarah Evans, General Manager for The George, sent the following,

“In response to the recent attention in the local press regarding our poor Environmental Health Standards inspection rating we would like to reassure our many valued customers that this rating does not reflect on the general hygiene or cleanliness in our spotless kitchens.

“When we were inspected at the beginning of September it transpired that the main issue concerned the responsibilities of our previous Head Chef who had failed to complete the necessary paperwork required for some of the more complex dishes on our menu which require specific cooking methods and temperatures. This administrative error has now been totally rectified and approved by the EHS.

“Two further minor faults concerning signage for staff in the kitchen and a replaced ceiling panel have also been successfully corrected.

“Although we now have a clean bill of health we have to wait until the New Year to be given our official new rating which we are confident will be back to our previous high standards. We apologise to our customers for any concern caused by these administrative errors.”

The George also sent over a letter received (and dated) today from Environmental Health (see below)

The Food Hygiene Rating Scheme: Explained
For further background on how food hygiene ratings work, the FSA Website explains,

“The Food Hygiene Rating Scheme (FHRS) in England, Wales and Northern Ireland helps consumers choose where to eat out or shop for food by giving them information about the hygiene standards in restaurants, takeaways and food shops.”

The Isle of Wight council Website, states

“The rating is based on the level of compliance found during the inspection with legal requirements relating to food hygiene practices, structure/cleanliness and management controls in place to ensure food is produced safely.

“The Food Hygiene Rating Scheme enables you to make an informed choice about where you choose to eat out or shop for food, as it gives you an idea of what’s going on in the kitchen, or behind closed doors.

“The scheme is a good advertisement for businesses that comply with food hygiene law, and encourages others to improve.”

Council explains hygiene inspection
An Isle of Wight Council spokesperson said:

“Any business that receives a food hygiene inspection is judged on three areas relating to hygiene and safety, confidence in management and the condition of the premises. Each section is given a score up to a maximum of 30, with the total score then added up. The lower the score, the higher the star rating, so for example a total score of below 15 would be a five star rating, whereas a score above 50 is a zero star rating.

“If a business receives a zero star rating, we would expect required improvements to be made and inspecting officers will offer advice and assistance to help businesses comply and improve. A zero star rating in itself is not a reason to close a business although if we feel the risk to the public was high then this is a possible outcome. The council has a staged enforcement policy in which there are a number of options available, and prosecution is only ever used as a last resort. The vast majority of businesses do make improvements, and since The George received a zero rating, a re-visit has taken place and improvements have been made.”

Paperwork

The George - Request for re-inspection 19 Nov - reblanked


Glossary
For those not involved with the catering trade, these definitions may be of help.

HACCP – The HACCP (Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point) is a system that helps food business operators look at how they handle food and introduces procedures to make sure the food produced is safe to eat.

Sous Vide – equipment to cook items when placed in a sealed bag, in a water bath.

Re-visit versus re-inspection – A re-visit is different to a re-inspection. A re-inspection is a full inspection where the scores will be done again, a report made and a rating given. A re-visit is just that, a visit to offer advice and guidance and ensure they are working towards any improvements. There are no reports with a re-visit.

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
20 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
old bull
20, November 2015 12:09 am

[part of comment removed by moderator]
Very sad the George let this happen. We not only good places to eat but also safe places.

Diogenese's Barrel
20, November 2015 4:26 am

How can the reasons listed by the inspectors for a zero rating be described as “Administrative errors”

They were fundamental failures of the management to operate their kitchen.

It’s very worrying, and they need more than just a re-inspection.

Caconym
20, November 2015 9:32 am

Perhaps OTW could ask The George about the points raised and ask them to explain how each of them was due to “paperwork”?

I can see how a couple of them could be down to poor recording, but that’s about it.

Mark Francis
20, November 2015 9:41 am

The question is whether or not you are likely to get food poisoning or not. All the rest of the scores on the doors schtick is of only peripheral relevance.
[part of comment removed by moderator]

davimel
20, November 2015 12:13 pm

MMMM IoWCP make yet another booboo! How can they as journalists(?) state as fact that the issue was a paperwork error when a simple bit of REAL journalism would show a little more to this than was first claimed. I doubt it was a major issue, but trying to cover up with ‘corporate speak’ and blaming an ex staff member does no favours. Just tell the truth… Read more »

Fred Karno
20, November 2015 12:26 pm

The 8th point on the inspection report says, “Ensure regular hand washing is undertaken”. Presumably the premises were picked up on this point by the Environmental Health Officer, otherwise why would the report state this? The manager in her defensive statement says, “This rating does not reflect on the general hygiene”. Excuse me, but I beg to differ. Hand washing most certainly is general hygiene and many… Read more »

Garry
20, November 2015 4:46 pm

Before moving to the island we lived in an area known as the ‘balti belt’. All those establishments somehow had FSA ratings.
I’d rather have a meal at the George with it’s current rating than any of the 4 star baltis we’ve left behind.

Diogenese's Barrel
Reply to  Garry
20, November 2015 5:08 pm

Garry this is not about comparisons with unknown (to us islanders) mock Indian food eating places in the Midlands (presumably).

It is about one of the previously well-respected eating places on the Isle of Wight which has now been shown to be incapable of even meeting basic national food hygiene requirements.

It is about a loss of credibility and confidence by diners on the island.

Garry
Reply to  Diogenese's Barrel
20, November 2015 5:34 pm

You’ve obviously missed the point of my comment and your first paragraph is, quite frankly, offensive, unnecessary and suggests a lack of knowledge of what islanders know.

Graham
Reply to  Garry
20, November 2015 7:24 pm

Garry. Unfortunately you’ve come across a small group of island elitists who see anyone who moves here as inferior. They will never agree with you, regardless of topic, purely because you were not born here. Please be assured that not all island residents are as bigotted as they are.

Mr Einsteins Ghost
20, November 2015 7:42 pm

Garry…to echo Graham’s comment, their is sadly a significant ‘insular’ section of the island. They are far from the majority, but they do have the largest voices! Welcome.

Garry
Reply to  Mr Einsteins Ghost
21, November 2015 7:54 pm

The philosopher does appear to show less intelligence than the receptacle that he lives in. Perhaps because he is too far up his own rectum and is unable to see any other point of view.

leonard
21, November 2015 8:19 pm

Having lived in various parts of the country, I think Gerry is broadly correct in his point of view. However, being from the Island, it does irritate me that people think anyone who disagrees with someone from the mainland is ‘insular’. Frankly, I dont care if someone from the mainland moves here, but I do care when people stereotype. That goes for the philosopher and the spectre… Read more »

retired Hack
Reply to  leonard
21, November 2015 9:36 pm

I agree, but it’s still a complete mystery to me as to what any of this has to do with food safety ratings. Posh hotels or balti joints, they both need regulating. And individual good experiences are of no help at all. I might just as usefully say: “I’ve smoked 40 a day for 50 years and look at me, fit as a flea. Therefore smoking is… Read more »

leonard
Reply to  retired Hack
21, November 2015 11:41 pm

of course individual experiences are important.

How often have you eaten somewhere that a friend has recommended?

and of course each individuals experience will differ.

the george and balti places are absolutely comparable. either they are doing everything correctly or they are not. the size of the establishment doesnt matter.

Caconym
Reply to  leonard
22, November 2015 1:52 pm

Personally, I have found that the most insular and parochial residents of the IW are those who have retired here from the mainland.

They want the IW to be the rural backwater they imagined for their dotage and take great exception to anything that might improve the lives of young people on the IW.

gordon
Reply to  Caconym
22, November 2015 4:10 pm

And of course, coming from outer space as you do, you would have vast experience of what mainlanders want. Don’t get out much, do you!

Caconym
Reply to  gordon
23, November 2015 7:28 am

Truth hurts, eh?

BRIAN
Reply to  Caconym
22, November 2015 4:41 pm

Actually, Suruk, I have heard those sentiments from quite a few retired people from the mainland of whom I am one but don’t hold with those views. Their attitude is that we have come here to retire, our working days are over so why should we be bothered about economic life on the Island? So long as the shops are open, we have fuel for our car… Read more »

Caconym
Reply to  BRIAN
23, November 2015 7:38 am

Indeed, Brian. I have actually heard this expressed many times, maybe is is a small, but exceedingly vocal minority.

“I didn’t retire here for X to happen” is an all too familiar refrain.

I think that retirees with children and grandchildren living here know how hard it can be living and working here.

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined