Undercliff drive

Undercliff Drive: Eight weeks of works begin on residents’ new access road

Island Roads have now confirmed to residents of the landlocked properties on Undercliff Drive that as all planning conditions have been met, they are able to start work on building a new access road.

The work on the western end of the site began this week and as can be seen in the photos below (supplied by Gary Smedmore of Undercliff Glen Caravan Park), work on the eastern end to build the turnaround area and through path for walkers, cyclists and horses is well underway.

Work on the western end
Click on images to see larger versions

Works on the Western End of Undercliff Drive

Timescale and scope of works
Island Roads say the works are expected to last eight weeks.

The new access road will include a central passing point and “replicates the curved alignment of the now impassable section”.

Other works taking place
Island Roads go on to advise that two other small scale works will take place.

Works will be carried out on a section of the existing highway between Woodlands and the eastern hoarding. This is where the shared use path (for pedestrians, cyclists and horse-riders) will be formed along the line of the former highway.

Work on the Eastern end of the slip
Click on images to see larger versions

Works on the Eastern End of Undercliff Drive

Works on the Eastern End of Undercliff Drive

Works on the Eastern End of Undercliff Drive

Works on the Eastern End of Undercliff Drive

Other works include a section of the highway around 500 metres west of the replacement road. These works involve re-profiling a short, steep bump that has formed within the carriageway.

Until all the works are completed, the area continues to be out of bound, with residents’ access only from the western end.

Image: © Gary Smedmore

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
23 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Philip Hawkins
16, September 2016 2:39 pm

All looks very nice, but for how long?

Smacks of “papering over the cracks” . . .

Seasidenanny
Reply to  Sally Perry
17, September 2016 2:10 pm

Oh! Sally, didn’t mean to do that downer!! Sorry! Can’t think who would do previous ones simply for stating the obvious? Great that some of us can cycle or ride on what was the most beautiful road to Niton, lost to us and never to be replaced properly. It will never compensate for the pain, stress and misery to those most affected by the loss of that… Read more »

MF
18, September 2016 8:48 am

What sad news. One of the most beautiful routes on the Island never to be fully used again by holiday makers and islanders alike. The undercliff was one of those areas that inspired me to fall in love with the Island, and I’m sure many more people too.

Steven Goodman
Reply to  MF
18, September 2016 10:00 am

Yes, and that’s also a reminder that the undercliff was one of those areas that inspired the bs sales pitch from the previous council determined to sign us up to a pricey PFI switch before they could be voted out (Again, no apologies for the relevant repetition): We were assured repeatedly by the likes of Eddie, Jay, Stuart, & their gang on behalf of the local &… Read more »

okayanyway
Reply to  Steven Goodman
19, September 2016 12:22 am

what utter rubbish.

If there was no Island Roads now, what do you seriously think would be being done to the roads now? I can tell you ZERO. So be thankful.

There is nothing to thank the present council for regarding the roads on the island. The Undercliff Drive problem should and could have been solved by this council with island roads already.

I.Reader
Reply to  okayanyway
19, September 2016 12:22 pm

I seriously think that you should try going to bed earlier ok; if you get more rest you might start to see things more clearly.

Michael Douse
Reply to  Steven Goodman
19, September 2016 7:18 am

What utter truth!
That is exactly how the PFI was sold to us.

When will the land slip which occurred in April 2014 at the public highway on the Esplanade, East Cowes be cleared by Island Roads?

Jonathan Young
18, September 2016 7:12 pm

Too much defeatism on here. Let’s be absolutely clear. The option to restore Undercliff Drive to full vehicular use (known as “Option 7” on various IWC papers) remains an open option (by vote of elected councillors) and the IWC therefore has a duty to pursue it; and in particular, to pursue funding options, as well as technical options, by which it might be achieved. I’m sorry to… Read more »

Stewart Blackmore
Reply to  Jonathan Young
19, September 2016 9:47 am

Absolutely agree with you, Jon, and perhaps the new Council (to be elected in May next year) will have a very close look at this and investigate the possibility of funding from other sources to finish the job the previous Tory and this Independent administration promised to do.

phil jordan
Reply to  Stewart Blackmore
19, September 2016 5:48 pm

SB: This matter has absolutely nothing to do with an administration at County Hall. This matter has much to do with feasibility, technical capability and funding cost benefit. So, the first thing to recognise is that without an attempt to reduce the water table in the Undercliff there is a cast iron guarantee that the movement that has occurred here over thousands of years will continue. However,… Read more »

Michael Douse
Reply to  phil jordan
20, September 2016 8:46 am

Yes PJ, you are correct but the ‘desktop’ solution of removing water is rather more scientifically substantiated than you allude.
That solution is recommended by national professionals in the British Geological Survey.
May I suggest that the IW Council undertake a small scale test of water diversion at Springhill Woods above the East Cowes Esplanade landslip to verify its efficacy.

phil jordan
Reply to  Michael Douse
20, September 2016 7:00 pm

MD: The proposer of the scheme has agreed that there is no guarantee this will work, it is an untested case here and it derives from a desktop evaluation. However, I agree that in general these approaches are supported by some professionals. We are not discounting any of this whatsoever. It appears that the only hope of stabilising the Undercliff would be through a water reduction scheme.… Read more »

Philip Hawkins
Reply to  phil jordan
20, September 2016 12:00 pm

It IS down to the administration to hold Island Roads to their word. This scheme was specifically mentioned by them in their initial blurb as one of the key projects in the PFI. It failed partly due to the lack of proper site investigation. You cannot blame the high water table for their inability to find suitable ground for the anchors at the Niton end of the… Read more »

phil jordan
Reply to  Philip Hawkins
20, September 2016 6:50 pm

PH: The high water table was a key factor in the failure. That level was and is monitored. This area has slipped many times before..long before IR arrived on the scene. It continues to slip. It is a feature of coastal erosion and landslip that water is involved to a great extent. Either too much or lack of it…or changes to both. I have said this here… Read more »

tr
Reply to  phil jordan
20, September 2016 12:35 pm

So PJ,

what do we do? let Undercliff fall into the sea? where do we stop? how much is too much? when everyone south of Newport has lost their homes?

come on man – protect our beautiful island – it is one of the reasons you were elected…

phil jordan
Reply to  tr
20, September 2016 6:32 pm

tr: So, the first thing to *consider* (which is what we are doing at the moment) is whether the idea, at this place, to drill down and pump away the water, along a lengthy piece of land, for a lengthy period of time has any merit. We also need to consider the costs of that ‘exercise’. Then we need to find the money for that exercise if… Read more »

buckle
20, September 2016 12:29 pm

To suggest that this matter of funding has absolutely nothing to do with an administration at County Hall is not entirely correct: (1) Direct national government funds were refused on the basis that funding had already been allocated in the form of PFI. (2) The Council, in spite of vociferous & serious concerns chose to adopt PFI (3) It is no secret that the contract is quite… Read more »

phil jordan
20, September 2016 7:10 pm

b: I cannot support the previous administrations actions throughout recent history and their adoption of the PFI contract… nor the content of that resulting contractual agreement. Points 1 – 7 above were directly part of that administrations actions. However, we are NOT discounting (nor demonstrating arrogance) a proposed water reduction scheme and it is wrong to suggest otherwise. The current scheme is equally able to fail as… Read more »

buckle
20, September 2016 10:08 pm

PJ: Surely a £500,000 drainage scheme would be a better initial approach than £500,000 to lay Tarmac on an active mudslide? I’m not sure I would qualify the latter as a ‘measured approach ‘. Stability before construction is surely more sensible. After all, you wouldn’t build a house and then investigate the feasibility and costings for foundations at a later date. At least poor residents will only… Read more »

phil jordan
20, September 2016 10:49 pm

B:

A £500,000 drainage scheme that might not work…? will take up to five years…..? meanwhile residents should do what…?

Since the current scheme is being carried out and I have already expressed that we have not discounted the drainage scheme….what makes you think both cannot happen?

buckle
21, September 2016 7:57 am

PJ: What makes you think that I don’t think it is a good idea that the access road and a drainage scheme. should both happen? I have already stated that ground should be stabilised before construction. If the drainage scheme takes 5 years to function, would it be a good idea to start now ? If the plans were to incorporate and access road AND drainage, I… Read more »

nico
Reply to  buckle
21, September 2016 6:27 pm

… and the money comes from …. ?