Woodyard:

Real Ventures Ltd withdraw from bio-mass plans

Three years after being appointed preferred bidder to purchase the former Stag Lane tip and develop a bio mass plant on it, Real Ventures Ltd have today announced they are withdrawing from the project.

The announcement comes on the day the new Isle of Wight Cabinet is due to consider extending the preferred bidder status.

Already had two extensions
As reported through OnTheWight at the time, the preferred bidder option was then extended for 15 months in 2011 and then a further 12 months in 2012 (read the full background).

Yesterday, a petition of over 1,000 signatures calling for a full public consultation of the biomass plant was handed to the Isle of Wight council.

The Isle of Wight based company, headed by Michael Hammond, Ray Tucker and John Gallimore received the go-ahead for a plant in Lincolnshire last year.

CEO of Real Ventures Ltd, Ray Tucker told the CP,

“The decision to withdraw from Stag Lane has been made after very careful consideration and solely on the basis of Real Venture’s project portfolio.

“I don’t think the Stag Lane site is unsuitable for biomass and that it can’t be done. It’s just it’s a tricky site.

“Given the choice between a tricky site and an easier site, what would you do, and there are lots of easier sites available.”

Tanja Rebel from campaign group, Wight Biomess, said,

“Wight Biomess is over the moon with the decision of Real Ventures to withdraw its application for a Biomass Plant along the river Medina.

“We hope that the Isle of Wight Council now safeguards the river for the long-term future as the sensitive and beautiful eco-habitat that it is.”

Source

Image: PsNH under CC BY 2.0

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
24 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
DT
25, January 2013 8:29 am

I say go for it – This land isn’t used for any purpose, yet is in an ideal location to extend Ryde town. It would adjoin nicely to the area of the business park, Tesco, Mc Donalds and the new Busy Bee. HOWEVER My concerns are that it could potentially lead to another Oakfield/Elmfield location with a bad reputation and crime. Another issue I have, will it… Read more »

Hermit
25, January 2013 8:32 am

If the surrounding residents had not complained abut the “farm smells and flies” this wouldn’t have happened and would still be a working farm. These residents should not complain at all as it is entirely their fault. They forced the closure of the farm, forcing the owner to sell up. It is an extreme double standard for the residents to launch a petition to stop the development,… Read more »

davidatkinson89
25, January 2013 8:44 am

I don’t think complaining about the farm is to blame. What’s to blame is the idea (rightly or wrongly) that every person should own a home with a spare bedroom and a back garden. If people were seriously concerned about the development of a greenfield site, then perhaps they should allow for further density of the town centre. Not only would this increase footfall in the town… Read more »

davidatkinson89
Reply to  davidatkinson89
25, January 2013 8:51 am

Having said that, development of this would create more short term jobs and investment for the island.

Cynic
Reply to  davidatkinson89
25, January 2013 10:21 am

Not necessarily true- look at the new Pan Estate build, the majority of the construction work seems to have been done by mainland companies using the odd Island company from time to time.

Cynic
Reply to  davidatkinson89
25, January 2013 10:31 am

This is yet another poisonous legacy of the IWC in its dying gasps- along with the PFI contract, (probably) the Asphalt plant, a lousy education structure and performance and so on. Some salient questions. 1.Are we likely to see yet another “Delegated Decision not subject to Call-in because of its ‘urgency'” by somebody who plans to cut and run before 2 May 2013? 2. Who are the… Read more »

greenfiremouse
Reply to  Cynic
25, January 2013 7:17 pm

@ cynic: I have not found many references with regard to “Pennyfeathers Property Company Ltd” on the internet either, the majority being Court cases from mid 2012. Also, a few similarly named companies like Pennyfeathers Developments Limited and Pennyfeathers Land and Development Limited (both struck off and dissolved during the past few years) and Pennyfeathers Limited which is still a live company. All of them seem to… Read more »

Cynic
Reply to  greenfiremouse
25, January 2013 7:59 pm

@ greenfiremouse.

Thanks! It seems that the name “Pennyfeathers Property Company Ltd) is STILL available for registration at Companies House UK.

Strange?

Rosemary
Reply to  greenfiremouse
29, January 2013 12:30 am

I have found that Pennyfeathers Property Company Limited is registered in Jersey in 2008.

Cynic
Reply to  Rosemary
29, January 2013 9:58 am

Well spotted Rosemary! Yet another off-shore company in a tax haven joining VINCI, Mediam, MacQuarie attempting to profit from the IoW?

Matt Edmunds
25, January 2013 10:42 am

Anyone who thinks these houses aren’t necessary really isn’t aware of the “housing crisis” – an oft-used phrase which a lot of people don’t fully grasp. These houses aren’t for mythical new poeple coming to the Island. There are already too many people chasing too few houses, pushing rents up to a point fast becoming unsustainable. Even the maximum housing benefits are massively lower than the cost… Read more »

Bystander
Reply to  Matt Edmunds
25, January 2013 10:50 am

Thank the Conservatives for selling off the social housing to create more Conservatives.

Cynic
Reply to  Matt Edmunds
25, January 2013 11:05 am

@Matt Edmunds “As an example, no wonder there are 100 applicants within 24 hours of any decent council house that comes up in Newport. The system is broken, and new houses are definitely a part of the solution.”

How many of the new Pan Estate/Meadows houses have been built and are available as “affordable housing” as was promised at planning stage?

Cynic
Reply to  Cynic
25, January 2013 12:46 pm

Currently there are 24 affordable homes available on Pan Estate/Meadows.

ELLIE
25, January 2013 10:43 am

My concern would be what impact the loss of green fields would have on flooding in Ryde. Having been a victim of flooding it is very concerning that there is a plan to concrete over all the fields where Monkton brook runs through. The brook already bursts its banks and floods businesses and properties around the Strand. Will the proposed development have its own sewer system? or… Read more »

Island Monkey
Reply to  ELLIE
26, January 2013 8:23 pm

Flooding is a major problem to be overcome.

Let’s not forget there are another 3-400 homes still to be built off Ashey Road in Ryde. Some of the homes built there have already been on the slide.

The Island’s population wont grow without jobs. Asda just wont do it.

Bystander
25, January 2013 10:53 am

The stream doesn’t only burst its banks in the town it also does so at Pennyfeathers and these fields are waterlogged all winter, most of the autumn and most of the spring too.

Colin
25, January 2013 1:34 pm

Should be interesting as it gets a wee bit damp in that area…and as long as nobody minds the speedway track or will that be affected? Now where was the proposed go-cart track going to be? Will the current sewage system and surface water runoffs be able to cope with the extra given that the system already creaks at the seams? On the plus side, more houses… Read more »

Bystander
Reply to  Colin
25, January 2013 3:37 pm

By the time this is built they reckon well over 50% of retail sales will take place over the Internet. How will the people find the jobs to afford to live in these houses? and will they be able to get insurance cover against the flooding?

Hermit
25, January 2013 3:18 pm

I expect it will get built, then the residents will complain about the noise of the speedway and we’ll lose that too!

Darcy
25, January 2013 7:45 pm

Absolutely brilliant! Now someone please tell me why there are still empty affordable properties at Pan, whether new affordable island homes are being advertised on the mainland (chapter and verse, not rumour), and what new permanent jobs are available for islanders and overners in order to prevent them from joining the growing list of benefit claimants? “When will they ever learn, when will they ever learn…” …… Read more »

bayboy
26, January 2013 7:45 pm

I always thought that calling it Pan Meadows was a mistake. I doubted that many Islanders would buy a house on the ‘Pan Estate’. Common sense really.

Rosemary
Reply to  bayboy
29, January 2013 12:27 am

29 January 2013 Dear onthewight I have read with growing concern about Pennyfeathers. It includes a “SINC” a Site of Importance for Nature Conservation as well as Ancient Woodland. The Island Plan does indicate that this massive area can be developed but is this what is required or desired? AONB celebrates its 50th anniversary and on its website it can inform people about its work including protecting… Read more »

tryme
29, January 2013 7:49 pm

I totally agree with Rosemary. Ray Mears was on TV recently, celebrating the ancient woods of the Island, & the biodversity of plants & creatures that goes along with it. For someone of his travelling experience to be genuinely bowled over by it, was a joy to see. How much longer will the Island be regarded as ‘a jewel’, I wonder. Come in Isle of Wight, your… Read more »

Rosemary
30, January 2013 1:53 am

“Wild on Wight” has very good information on wildlife and biodiversity.

It also gives inoformation about “SINCs” on the Isle of Wight, including the
SINC Pennyfeathers,
Grid Reference SZ598906

http://www.wildonwight.co.uk/lrc/pdfs/List%20of%20SINCS%20for%20LDF.pdf

http://www.wildonwight.co.uk

http://www.wildonwight.co.uk/publications/haps/Woodland.pdf

Isle of Wight Biodiversity Action Plan Woodland Habitat Action Plan

jacqui
22, February 2013 1:44 pm

I attended the 200 strong meeting on Monday 18th February 2013 in Garfield road Ryde and not one of the invited guests, namely water authority, Highways, IOW council bothered to show up. People had many concerns about flooding, pollution, demands on infrastructure, noise pollution with a potential 1800 additional vehicles on the road. There were questions about how this development fits with the green Eco Island aspiration… Read more »

Cynic
22, February 2013 2:54 pm

Did anybody from the alleged sponsors- Pennyfeathers Property Company Ltd- turn up to the meeting ? Apparently it is registered in the Jersey Tax haven.

[Companies House (UK) shows one Pennyfeathers Ltd (Co. #05846135) but no Pennyfeathers plc – whom the applicant appears to represent- and indicates two companies bearing a Pennyfeathers name were dissolved in 2009/2010.]

James Luke
13, June 2013 7:49 pm

Those opposed to this development may want to consider signing this petition calling for localism to be given greater emphasis in planning decisions =>

http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/38742

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined