Christ-the-King-Pupils-walking cropped

Christ the King College refute Council’s view on school’s ‘ill-judgement’

The Governing Body of Christ the King College have expressed their disappointment at the statement issued by the Isle of Wight council (IWC) in which Leader of the Isle of Wight council, Cllr Dave Stewart, said the school had made an ” ill-judged decision”.

The Governors refute the IWC’s view “that the decision to lease the building was ill-judged and was undertaken without the approval of the Council”.

Agreement entered into with IWC’s permission
The statement issued by the Governing body this afternoon reads:

The Governing Body of Christ the King College are disappointed to read the statement given on behalf of the Isle of Wight Council regarding the funding of the sixth form block.

“We totally refute the Isle of Wight Council’s view that the decision to lease the building was ill-judged and was undertaken without the approval of the Council. The Governing Body was only able to enter this agreement with the express permission of the Isle of Wight Council who, along with both Dioceses, supported the establishing of an 11-18 school to contribute to the raising of standards across the Island and to provide families with choice and diversity.

The extract below confirms the Local Authority had full knowledge, provided support for the lease agreement and needs to share responsibility for this situation.

“The Council approves the entry into the Hire Contract by the Governing Body and agrees that the same will not cause the Governing Body to be in breach of any restrictions or obligations stated in the Scheme for Financing Schools or exceed any limitations on the powers of the Governing Body stated in the Schools and Standards Framework Act 1998.”
Extract from a letter from Steve Beynon, Chief Executive of the Isle of Wight Council, addressed to the Principal of Christ the King College, 14th February 2013.

Suffered “significant lack of financial support”
The statement from the Governors goes on to say,

Christ the King College has suffered historically from a significant lack of financial support during our growth, and we have repeatedly and consistently requested capital support and financial help that we know has been given to other schools.

We note that Councillor Stewart refers to responsible use of tax payers’ money and, as a Governing Body, it is important to state that all our revenue funds are spent on our students and their education and not, as the Council wishes us to do, spend on a building we believe should have been provided for our community.

Working relentlessly to resolve issue
The Governors add,

We also completely refute the Council’s view that we are not taking responsibility to find a solution. The Governing Body has been, and continues, to work relentlessly to resolve this issue.

We are pleased that the Isle of Wight Council recognises that the school is high attaining and that the day-to-day management is perfectly sound. We would add to this that the Isle of Wight Council has facilitated more than one meticulous audit of our finances, all carried out by PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC), and there is absolutely no evidence of any financial mismanagement.

On the contrary, the current deficit is solely attributable to the annual capital cost of the sixth form building and the lease which was entered knowingly and in good faith by all involved in the setting up of the school.

Education at the school continues to be secure
They finish by saying,

We hope that the Island community will share our view that our young people deserve to have their educational facilities provided for them and should not have to bear the cost themselves from the revenue which should be spent on resources and teachers.

In the meantime, we will continue to support the leadership of the College in providing the very best education that they can for our students, and we wish to reassure parents, staff and students that their education with us continues to be secure.

Image: © Christ the King College

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
0 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Rod Manley
29, February 2016 12:40 pm

The hope is that this “devolution” should be buried out of the way. The MP should take a stand on behalf of the Isle of Wight and say the same.

End the Bid now!

Jim Moody
29, February 2016 1:05 pm

It’s clearly not devolution, as that would involve giving powers to an entity split away from a larger one. Examples are Scotland and Wales. This is an amalgamation, with certain powers currently exercised by the Isle of Wight county council being surrendered. The only reason Bacon et al are interested is trying to scrabble around for funds so they won’t be seen as implementing Tory government cuts.

Jonathan Bacon
Reply to  Jim Moody
29, February 2016 4:32 pm

This does not involve surrendering powers but you are perfectly right that the reason to pursue this is the money. If it might give us the £17m + per year that is needed to balance the books into the future the least we can do do is stay at the table and consider it.

Cicero
Reply to  Jonathan Bacon
29, February 2016 4:49 pm

JB- Who, where and how would a devolved Hants & IoW region decide which local councils (or groups of councils) would take responsibility for delivering the various services across the region?

Jonathan Bacon
Reply to  Cicero
29, February 2016 6:01 pm

The Councils would continue to deliver their own services and come together to deliver those functions handed down from central government (eg infrastructure development and transport planning). The model originally offered was of an Executive group of leaders heading a small number of committees dealing with each of these functions with proportional representation for all authorities involved across these committees. No separate administration was suggested with all… Read more »

Cicero
Reply to  Jonathan Bacon
29, February 2016 7:45 pm

Thanks for the clarification. How would the “proportional representation” be worked out?

prof
Reply to  Jonathan Bacon
29, February 2016 7:49 pm

Given the IOW’s small population relative the combined region our voice in a PR arrangement would have been virtually inaudible. Does the new proposal include any measures to ensure we do not end up as a junior partner, dominated by the influence of the two large cities in the southern region? Additional money is great but only if it we have sufficient control over it to ensure… Read more »

Jonathan Bacon
Reply to  Jonathan Bacon
29, February 2016 11:23 pm

This is for Prof but the Reply option doesn’t appear under your comment. The PR Model is based on an LGA model for balancing the interests of different types of authorities based on population but also relating to whether they are one or two tier (Hampshire of course is served by both the County Council and District Councils). The model would put us roughly on the same… Read more »

Cicero
Reply to  Jonathan Bacon
1, March 2016 8:01 am

JB “The PR Model is based on an LGA model ”

Pls post a link where I can inspect the details of the LGA model. Thanks

billy builder
Reply to  Jonathan Bacon
1, March 2016 8:43 am

Proportional Representation noun an electoral system in which parties gain seats in proportion to the number of votes cast for them. That sounds like an ideal basis for regional elections, where each party (including the less desirable ones) would have appropriate representation. In this area we would have a slightly right of centre administration – not perfect but certainly significantly better than the makeup being proposed. On… Read more »

Cicero
Reply to  Jonathan Bacon
1, March 2016 9:49 am

“This won’t happen as the rich areas will not support the poorer ones. Tory dogma through and through”

…. so PR is waste of time in addition to being undemocratic due to the selection and ranking procedures of political parties? :-))

billy builder
Reply to  Jonathan Bacon
1, March 2016 10:05 am

Cicero, as I may well have said before, it is because we do not have PR or a PR variant that we do not have representative democratic government.

Cicero
Reply to  Jonathan Bacon
1, March 2016 10:18 am

BB that is true, but you still will not have representative government until every citizen is compelled to vote.

Currently UK governments are often chosen by only 35% of the electorate. The better organised political parties are more successful in getting their voters to turn up at the ballot box., which skews “representative government”

billy builder
Reply to  Jonathan Bacon
1, March 2016 10:26 am

I would also suggest that the current system focuses the vote to the extremes rather than to the centre where most voters would be more at home.

Ali Hayden.
29, February 2016 1:32 pm

So it seems the more prosperous areas want a Mayor + aren’t happy, reading this. A reminder of why the Isle Of Wight Council were in talks about devolution; (a) Support the prospectus for a devolution deal for Hampshire and Isle of Wight as the basis for negotiation with government. (c) Confirm that the final devolution deal must ensure the financial security of Isle of Wight and… Read more »

Cicero
29, February 2016 3:48 pm

(Beeb) Hampshire had a crunch meeting of county and district leaders. This one of the biggest, and most prestigious applications. One leader told me afterwards “It was a bloody business.” The districts have been spooked by increased housing numbers. All along they’ve ducked and weaved to avoid the hated election of a “metro-mayor”. And into that disunity I hear the government has thrust a fatal blow, calling… Read more »

Cicero
29, February 2016 3:51 pm

(Beeb Hants & IoW ) “Death of the Southern Shire Powerhouses”

Mark Francis
1, March 2016 9:59 pm

This is more about amalgamating the IOW with Hampshire on account of the IOW not being trusted to run itself due the screw up that Pugh & his chums made of children’s services such that Hampshir had to take them over.
Say it ain,t so.

ThomasC
Reply to  Mark Francis
2, March 2016 12:36 pm

Well it’s probably a certain element of the failure of certain parts of the IWC, but it’s also about centralising services to cut costs. With the technology infrastructure available to under-pin and support the efficient delivery of certain services, the existence of multiple very similar units deserves to be questioned and reviewed. The combined delivery of health and care services on the IW has been highlighted as… Read more »

Cicero
Reply to  ThomasC
2, March 2016 1:40 pm

Centralisation rarely cuts costs owing to the growth of beancounters and unproductive managers recruited to set and monitor “targets”, viz NHS under Blair/Brown/Cameron.

Interesting that now it seems that Cameron/Feldman are trying to “centralise” grass roots Tory branches.

The gauleiters are coming!

Terry Carpenter
2, March 2016 1:11 pm

If it looks like a duck and you can hear quacking… it may be a decoy.

Why split Hampshire in half and then try to glue the Isle of Wight to it?

What do the Tory Government wish to achieve from this crack pot scheme?

Is the Solent just a stream running through their new back garden?