Coalition Agrees To Public Hearings on Electoral Boundary Changes

Following the news previously reported by VB about the House of Lords decision on the Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Bill, this article in from David Nove. Ed

Houses of ParliamentNews has come in that agreement has been reached between the Government and the House of Lords over the electoral reform bill.

An amendment passed in the Lords to reject the idea of the Island sharing an MP with part of the mainland was one of two defeats for the Government.

The coalition has now agreed to allow Public Hearings into any proposed Boundary Changes by the electoral Commission.

Quite where this leaves Parliamentary representation for the Island is unclear.

The Government could leave things alone or it could try to get the Lords decision overturned on the grounds that there would be a public hearing on any changes proposed.

Image: Loz Flowers under CC BY 2.0

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
6 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Vicky
1, February 2011 9:42 am

I totally agree that the island should not share an mp with the mainland – the issues that need to be dealt with are completely different! And I bet it will end up with the islands problems being ignored.

hmmm
1, February 2011 6:53 pm

i also totally agree that the island should not share an MP… so long as we are overrepresented, not underrepresented. Turner should be actively campaigning for a move to 2 island based MPs, not trying to maintain the status quo and keep his job.

Don Smith
Reply to  hmmm
1, February 2011 7:36 pm

Yes ! I totally agree – There is a need for two local MPs. AT will be elevated to the ‘House of Nod (Lords) soon, so that would be a great time for islanders to get representation that they deserve. Why we elect (who have been selected by a minority) MPs and let an unelected body make our laws I just can not understand. Scrap te ‘House… Read more »

Dave Q
2, February 2011 7:36 am

If we must have boundary changes, lets have two Island MPs, something that has been talked about on and off for many years. We are an Island entity and as such do not deserve to have part of our electorate used to prop up a mainland MP who will not represent us fairly.

Communist
Reply to  Dave Q
2, February 2011 11:47 am

Agreed, the island needs to consolidate its partial triumph in maintaining itself as a single entity and upholding its constitutional rights.This needs to go forward in the demand for proper representation because of the size of the local electorate. 2 MP’s for the island is an important principle and a right.

no.5
Reply to  Communist
2, February 2011 12:02 pm

My ideal has always been two Island MPs…but will accept a split constiuency over the current situation.

We can no longer suffer under-representation as our ‘status quo’

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined