band aid tin lid on pavement

Extra £4.8m schools funding will not have ‘full optimistic impact that politicians suggest’, says NEU (updated)

Yesterday (Tuesday) the Isle of Wight council issued a press release announcing an extra £4.8m for schools in the coming financial year.

The council said the extra investment would lift per pupil funding to a minimum of £5,000 for secondary school students next year (from April and £3,750 for primary school pupils.

Balancing against cuts already made
As was picked up by several readers, this cash boost follows in the footsteps of £11m cuts of funding to schools over the last five years.

The Isle of Wight Branch of the National Education Union (NEU) responded that,

“Two secondaries are announcing staffing restructures with redundancies this month. Yearly shortfall for Island schools £2.3m since 2015.”

Shreeve: “Will not have the full optimistic impact that politicians suggest”
Peter Shreeve, Assistant District Secretary of the Isle of Wight branch of the NEU, told OnTheWight,

“£4.8 million whilst welcome, it is insufficient. This £4.8 million breaks down into:

  • £3.5 million for mainstream schools. This is really welcome and appears a huge sum. However, last September, the Island in-year schools budget overspend forecast was £1,147,000. Assuming that deficit has not increased and the money will pay the deficit, we are left with less than £2.4 million.
  • £1.2 million for special educational needs and disabilities (SEND).  Again, really welcome.  However, the previous year’s high needs deficit was £908,000.  Therefore, there is £292,000 remaining.

“An increase, for which we are grateful, but it will not have the full optimistic impact that politicians suggest. For many years Island High Needs provision has been cut. Cuts are being planned again for September.  Look at paragraph 22 of the latest school’s forum committee report from the 15th January, which offers centralised SEND cuts of £450,000, in an attempt to balance budgets.  If these cuts are to go ahead, then much needed support for local pupils will be further withdrawn.”

Councillor Paul Brading, Cabinet member for children’s services, said,

“While I would question the figures quoted by School Cuts, I do recognise that more funding is needed to support our schools.

“Yesterday’s announcement of an extra £4.8 million for Island schools is a step in the right direction, however, we must and will continue to press the government for further investment.”

Peter went on to add,

“In June, the Education Select Committee described national SEND funding as “completely inadequate”.

“Isn’t this true even more locally? The LA has been forced to rack up massive deficits in their High Needs Block spending. The latest figures show 4.4% of all Island students have statements or ECH Plans – the highest proportion in the South East and the fourth highest nationally!”

Early Years funding
Peter went on to say,

“The DfE’s own research shows that most people working in early years are on the National Living Wage. These recent rising costs have risen by 13.5% and after three years of a funding freeze have impacted hard on Early Years.

“Early years funding has seen a slight increase in the national funding, adding 8 pence per child per hour across national funding rates.

“In the meantime, this extra £129,000 or 1.9% more compared to 2019/20 after this 3-year funding freeze is insufficient, especially when you consider inflation has been over 2% (and as high as 3%) in 2 of the last 3 years.

“We are acutely aware nursery school funding is insufficient and stopgap measures or allocating money to plug early years holes needs to cease.

“The Government must make a funding commitment in the Budget on 11 March that secures the long-term future of maintained nursery schools.

“If they do not, more nursery schools will simply be put at risk of closure.”

He finished by adding,

“In Dickens’ David Copperfield, Mr Micawber’s recipe for happiness was “Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen six, result happiness. Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pound ought and six, result misery.”

“We are grateful for the funding, but it doesn’t fill the black hole of previous years.  There were several restructures and redundancies last year and this year it continues. If Mr Micawber is correct, it is likely that there’s more misery to come!”

School Cuts analysis
Last Autumn analysis by the School Cuts coalition showed:

  • Children in almost all local authorities in England are still losing out, as the allocation to schools in 2020/21 still needs £2.5bn to reverse the cuts which have taken place since 2015.
  • Around one third of all schools will see real-terms cuts to their budgets 2020/21 because school costs are greater than inflation.
  • There will still be a shortfall of £1.1bn 2020/21 in the funding required to reverse devastating cuts in 16-19 education.
  • Even after an additional £700m, the High Needs Block will still be £1.5bn short of what is needed to support the education of the most vulnerable children and young people.

IWC response
OnTheWight has asked Cllr Brading how the £4.8m promised from April squares with the £11m+ cut over last five years. We’ll add his response once we hear back.

Article edit
18.55 – comment from Paul Brading added

Image: Franck V under CC BY 2.0

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
1 Comment
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Nitonia
9, July 2014 10:51 am

I’d like to hear more about Christ the King’s entrance conditions. Why will everyone from the West Wight be denied places?

Caconym
Reply to  Nitonia
9, July 2014 12:14 pm

I think you are confused by the wording of the article. Kids from the West Wight are no more likely to be denied a place At CtK than from anywhere else. What the article is saying is that parents who WANT their children to go to Carisbrooke will have to put CtK as their first choice (and Carisbrooke as their second) and hope to be turned down… Read more »

Mark Francis
Reply to  Nitonia
10, July 2014 9:51 am

You have to pretend to be a God Botherer – or, given the archaic title of the school, a Fifth Monarchist.
Besides which there appears to be perfectly good cycle path along the river.

Caconym
Reply to  Mark Francis
10, July 2014 12:27 pm

Actually you have to do the complete opposite. If you live in the West Wight and want your child to attend Carisbrooke or Medina AND benefit from free bus travel then you HAVE to put CtK as your first choice, but make damn certain they reject your application. Rather than claiming to be a “God Botherer”, you need to claim you are an die-hard atheist who thinks… Read more »

Colin
9, July 2014 1:01 pm

Right, let’s see.

The Council decides to reorganise the school system so that middle school children are no longer educated locally but are required to travel longer distances to senior schools.

A couple of years later, the council doesn’t like the cost of financing their own reorganisation so try to pass the cost on to the parents.

And they wonder why criticism comes their way.

Caconym
Reply to  Colin
9, July 2014 1:46 pm

To be fair, it was the previous administration who were responsible for the school reorganisation fiasco.

Doesn’t make these proposals for free (or, rather, the lack of free) school transport any less of a mess, though!!

phil jordan
Reply to  Caconym
9, July 2014 6:10 pm

suruk the slayer: I wonder why the previous administration did not sort out the school transport issue when they decided to make wholesale changes to the school system on our Island….? Would it not have been part of the process of re-organisation to actually do that…? Cllr Whitehouse would do well to express criticism of the kafkaesque and completely bizarre actions of his conservative colleagues previous management……… Read more »

Chris Newman
Reply to  phil jordan
10, July 2014 2:40 am

But the Conservatives did sort out the buses to suit the new School 2Tier system, its the Indies that have caused the problem by removing the bus solution.

Cynic
Reply to  Chris Newman
10, July 2014 8:17 am

Mmmm! Mussolini’s claim to fame was that he “sorted out the trains!” :-)

phil jordan
Reply to  Colin
9, July 2014 6:17 pm

Colin:

I’m afraid the previous administration implemented the (failed?) re-organisation of schools on this Island.

In addition, to accompany that (now documented) failed initiative, they omitted to include implementation of a schools transport Policy to match the accompanying re-organisation.

Yet one more issue left over from the last administration to sort out….

Colin
Reply to  phil jordan
10, July 2014 9:12 am

@ phil I am well aware of which administration did what. I remember the headlines of the announcement of the £28 million contract with SV made with misplaced pride and wondered why it was such a wonderful idea to spend £4 million a year transporting the pupils to schools miles from their homes whilst closing schools on their doorsteps. And now we have the free school opening… Read more »

RJC
9, July 2014 3:17 pm

Simple solution. Move the bus stops.

Cynic
Reply to  RJC
9, July 2014 3:30 pm

,,,,and/or the bus route?

Cynic
Reply to  Cynic
9, July 2014 3:34 pm

e.g. Yarmouth Rd/Forest Rd/Gunville Rd/Taylor Rd?

or

Middle Rd/Gunville Rd/Taylot Rd?

Chris Newman
10, July 2014 2:30 am

This is exactly the point that I made in my entry on the objections petition. It also effects Medina College as they will lose ALL West Wight students to Carisbrooke & Christ the King. They will also lose all South Wight to the new Free School, and Sandown Academy, and all the West Cowes Students. Medina has Students starting in September 2014 from 39 Isle of Wight… Read more »

Chris Newman
10, July 2014 2:36 am

Sorry, I meant my comment to be a reply to Chris Whitehouse’s Post. :)

Mark Francis
10, July 2014 9:58 am

Actually it is probably not Kafkaesque as such – since that would imply an existential questioning of our identity & the meaning of our role within the world and a corruptible society rather than which bus to take.

Either that or waking up as an insect.

This term might however be alluding to the entrance requirements to “faith” schools.

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined