Fate of Coastal Management Team hangs in balance

Nearly a month ago OnTheWight broke the story that the Isle of Wight council was actively considering disbanding the Island’s dedicated Coastal Management Team.

Internal council papers that OnTheWight has seen revealed that the decision on the fate of the world-renowned team will be made public this week.

Dedicated team
This team is dedicated to keeping an eye on the Island’s coastline – the longest of any authority in England. It was them, for example, that raised the alarm on the huge Totland coastal movement earlier this year.

A short while after OnTheWight published, the Isle of Wight Association of Local Councils (IWALC) also went public about their concerns of the possible loss of the team.

Cllr Pugh defends action
Current council leader David Pugh then went on record at the last Full Council meeting before next month’s elections saying that disbanding the team was a good idea, saying that transferring some of the people to Roads PFI company, Island Roads, meant that it would end up a better service.

Those knowledgeable in the area have pointed out that as Island Roads is a commercial company and as such is only interested in anything that directly affects the Isle of Wight roads, pointing out that much coastal erosion doesn’t fall within this category

A period of non-controversial decisions
Due to the closeness of the elections, the council in a state called Purdah, where new or controversial initiatives have to, by law, be avoided by councillors.

People have questioned why something as controversial as disbanding the world-renowned team is not covered by this.

The reasoning – as the currently-ruling Conservative council passed their responsibility on council staff employment over to council directors under Delegated Powers, it slips through the ‘controversial change’ net.

Many have told OnTheWight that a decisions as fundamental to the future safety of the the Island’s coastline could alter the voting in the election of previously-enthusiastic Conservative voters.

Image: flissphil under a CC BY 2.0 license

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
16 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Diane Etherton
15, April 2013 4:08 pm

It’s time Councillor Pugh stopped being so arrogant and thought about the effect this will have on the Island.

Billy Builder
15, April 2013 4:15 pm

Unfortunately as the post of Principle Engineer requires a degree qualified individual with many years professional experience, it is not appropriate for the Council retain such a person. To do so would mean having someone on-board that actually knows what they are doing. How could David Pugh or Stuart Love hope to pull the wool over the electorate’s eyes, with people in post that can expose the… Read more »

Craig from Bembridge
15, April 2013 4:16 pm

What reason is being given to break up this highly respected team of coastal engineers? Could it be penny pinching?

How about cutting some of the larger salaries of senior officers back to reasonable levels and clawing back the payoff given to Beygnome?

Surely that will help a bit.

A2B
15, April 2013 4:50 pm

Stuart Love has been told that coastal management team MUST be kept for the time being and plans to disband this team are to be squashed. This could be construed as taking note of consultation, valuing of the service, all-round good practice (for an Island!)or quite simply poltically motivated to create a doomsday scenerio and then to be seen to ‘listening’ and ‘caring’. Watch the council website… Read more »

steve s
15, April 2013 5:23 pm

If this is true (and I suspect that it might be) David may live to regret accusing Ventnor Town Council of ‘hysterical scaremongering’.

Drone
Reply to  steve s
15, April 2013 6:01 pm

David Pugh regret anything? Are you serious, he’s wearing the same Teflon jacket that Steve Beynon used to don.

He’ll likely spin this around to try and make it seem as if he was championing the coastal team.

Darcy
Reply to  Drone
15, April 2013 7:47 pm

Didn’t do Bunion much good in the end, did it?

Black Dog
Reply to  Drone
15, April 2013 9:06 pm

A bit like he did with the Island Flag, what an a#@e

Chris Welsford
16, April 2013 7:58 am

I have been working to prevent this from happening. I am the IWC representative at SCOPAC, the Standing Conference on Problems Associated with the Coast. I attended SCOPAC just after the proposal was announced and delegates that I told were shocked at the lack of foresight displayed. For us to retain and attract the funding we need to research these issue, we need a credible team managed… Read more »

Billy Builder
Reply to  Chris Welsford
16, April 2013 8:35 am

Hi Chris, The point that you have made about Stuart Loves proposal loosing expertise is absolutely right. It is difficult enough for an island such as the Isle of Wight to attract people of the right calibre to fill these essential roles, but the more the island deskills the more difficult it will be to get the right people. Following the failure in both Children Services and… Read more »

Hipster
16, April 2013 1:27 pm

Boy Blunder and Stuart ‘Tainted’ Love’s position on the coastal management team is now showing some signs of cracks and distress as they need to do some serious back-peddling and humble pie eating. Hubris, arrogance and pig-headedness come naturally but honesty and integrity are completely alien concepts for these gentlemen…sorry slip of the tongue!! Landslides in Newport/Cowes yes but we dont want them around our shores thank… Read more »

wight paul
16, April 2013 10:32 pm

Can’t understand how one or two people can have such a control over what happens, Pugh and Love can’t really know or care what our coast needs, yet they’ll decide who stays, and who goes because know best.

Jonathan Bacon
16, April 2013 10:57 pm

Chris Welsford and I have arranged to meet with Stuart Love tomorrow (Wednesday) to challenge this proposed decision. I hope that, at least, the decision can be postponed so that it can be properly assessed after the election, although, like Chris, I am firmly of the view that the current proposal is bad.

Jonathan Bacon
(Independent: Brading, St Helens and Bembridge)

Alan
17, April 2013 10:18 am

Chris & Jonathan, Clearly Stuart Love will agree/promise to anything today and a postponement is very likely (which is a good thing for the Island) – but he is also playing a tactical game for his own future as the council’s senior officer after the election. Ask yourselves could you really work with a person who is so ‘close’ to all that is wrong with this administration,… Read more »

Rowan
17, April 2013 10:49 am

If this scaremongering suggestion is true then it’s even more shocking than the sacking of all tourist information centre staff. Thousands of people’s homes, the safety of Island roads and footpaths, natural habitats, coastal businesses, tourism and the whole Island economy – they’re all affected by what happens to the coast. We need people who know what they’re doing to keep an eye on the coast and… Read more »

hussar
17, April 2013 11:07 am

Please read the Island Independents document FRAMEWORK FOR THE FUTURE on line- they have promised that if they get in on May 2nd and the present administration have gone ahead with disbanding of this team- under the Independents IT WILL BE FULLY REINSTATED.

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined