Is Central Government Policy Threatening Our Social Services?

“We are not taking this decision, the government is taking it.”

Is Central Government Policy Threatening Our Social Services?This month is crucial for support staff and clients at Westminster House, with further consultation on whether or not they will face closure. A paper will be brought to Cabinet on 30th March.

Regardless of whether the facility remains open, big changes are implied. Isle of Wight Council (IWC) still aims to save £1,473,000 by ‘redesigning’ social services.

What could change in their revisions are only the ‘possible services for transformation’.

The Council’s thesaurus must be well thumbed. They weren’t really planning to redesign Westminster House, were they? It’s not as if they got a team of architects in. So does ‘transform’ continue to mean ‘close’? There’s plenty more where that came from.

Changes not cuts
“This isn’t a cut, it’s a change of funding system,” said Councillor Ian Ward at the budget meeting last Wednesday.

“We have a new policy: Putting People First. Adult social care. We are not taking this decision, the government is taking it People seem to be unaware of this. Some of the people in social services [“¦] are not aware of this.”

So it’s all about ‘putting people first’, which sounds lovely. What has the government told them to do, then?

(If you’re interested, the ‘Putting People First’ leaflet can be viewed online)

Personalisation provides choice?
Apparently Central Government wants vulnerable people to become ‘consumers’, picking and choosing the services they need.

“They can make their own plans for services with the money from the council. They can also get together with friends to make the plans together, or they can ask an agent or the council to arrange things for them.” The leaflet reads.

This is because “people want better quality services that are personal to them and more control over decisions that affect them.”

But would the closing of centres really give clients greater control?

Once it’s gone, it’s gone
Councillor Reg Barry expressed a fear that if central services disappear ‘we may never get them back’, and will be left with a culture of handouts:

“You can’t give vulnerable people money and say ‘spend it how you like,'” he said. “[Some of them] will just go and spend it in Weatherspoons. [“¦] I think we are going down the wrong road and in two or three years time we will not be able to reverse it.”

Image: spin spin under CC BY-ND 2.0

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
19 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
YouPughbe
3, March 2010 2:44 pm

This one is a prime candidate for them to give the usual “lessons have been learned” when things go drastically wrong.
How about averting the disaster for once with a bit of vision?

Geoff Lumley
3, March 2010 3:20 pm

Government policy on ‘personalisation’ enjoys cross-party support at Westminster, and is something that service users and their carers have lobbied for for many years. The IW Council is cynically using the policy change as an excuse to make savage cuts in its social services provision. None of the local services need close if there was effective planning and forethought. The Tory Council Cabinet members should hold their… Read more »

Deborah Gardiner
Reply to  Geoff Lumley
3, March 2010 3:35 pm

Unfortunately this Council likes to blame the Government for everything they do that proves unpopular. They tried to blame the Government for forcing schools reorganisation on them, they were shown to be inventing this excuse. They also tried to prevent the Scrutiny Committee from conducting an enquiry into the state of Children’s Services by citing a lack of staff availablity to conduct such a review because of… Read more »

islebeseeingyou
Reply to  Deborah Gardiner
3, March 2010 4:10 pm

How can scrutiny investigate anything when the majority of those on there are from the ruling party? There used to be 2 independent (resident) members who disappeared from the scene and also a representative from IWALC (we all know why he disappeared). Why did these changes take place and who instigated them, why have no vacancies been advertised? Scrutiny is a statutory committee but I cannot believe… Read more »

Geoff Lumley
Reply to  islebeseeingyou
3, March 2010 4:57 pm

A very good point. I would argue and could provide evidence that the Scrutiny Committee of April 06-May 07 when I was Chair, with Deborah Gardiner as my right-hand woman, was a committee that made a real difference because it had an ‘opposition’ majority and properly held the leadership to account. Such was the difference it made that the Tories then decided to pack it with a… Read more »

YouPughbe
Reply to  Geoff Lumley
3, March 2010 5:31 pm

Roll on the next local elections, this lot will get what they deserve

Geoff Lumley
3, March 2010 5:52 pm

But that’s more than 3 years away and they didn’t get ‘what they deserved’ just last June. Islanders either seem to have either very short memories or enough (40%+)like what the Tories are doing

YouPughbe
Reply to  Geoff Lumley
3, March 2010 5:57 pm

Dont ask me I certainly didn’t/wouldn’t vote for em. I wouldn’t be in the slightest bit surprised if that is fixed just like everything else.

ebod
Reply to  YouPughbe
4, March 2010 10:32 pm

Given that there were more non-voters than voters, I would suggest those non-voters are as much to blame.

YouPughbe
Reply to  ebod
4, March 2010 10:55 pm

Well I wont be voting next time as I will be joining the 70-80% of non voters. Not because I cant be bothered but because I refuse to condone the whole sham that local government is by taking part. Pugh is nothing short of a hypocritical disgrace, but all his cronies are bending the system to breaking point to just let him off scot free, even down… Read more »

I Love My Cat
Reply to  YouPughbe
4, March 2010 11:04 pm

I have never felt so disenfranchised locally or nationally, nor have I felt such searing anger towards those who profess to ‘lead’ us. I’m glad I am not young, at least I can remember when public servants were just that and proud of it.

ebod
Reply to  YouPughbe
4, March 2010 11:06 pm

IMO That kind of attitude plays directly into their hands. Don’t you think perhaps you’re maintaining the status quo by NOT voting? You can’t really complain when these twits get voted back in!

Island Shocker
Reply to  YouPughbe
4, March 2010 11:14 pm

Sadly it aint just the Tories! We have Lib-Dums on bail remember. The whole rotten lot from all parties and none seem to be as bad as each other – clinging to office regardless of their wrong-doing or in some cases, blatant lawbreaking. We need a revolution not an election. An uprising with public stocks and gallows for the worst offenders. That should keep any new ones… Read more »

ebod
Reply to  YouPughbe
4, March 2010 11:28 pm

A revolution? This is the Isle of Wight we’re talking about remember, where the majority of the public are about as politically active as a bucket of mud. It’s going to take something more radical than recent events to wake people from their apathetic stupor.

YouPughbe
4, March 2010 11:22 pm

And me having my big opportunity to vote once every four years, which I also have no confidence in being recorded fairly either, certainly in no way addresses our views being dismissed, petitions being dis-guarded, sham consultations or the blatant corruption.

ebod
Reply to  YouPughbe
4, March 2010 11:35 pm

So your solution to that is…don’t vote? But isn’t that just accepting that’s the way it is? How does that help or change anything? If you REALLY wanted it to change, you’d do something about it.

YouPughbe
Reply to  ebod
4, March 2010 11:46 pm

They have a responsibility to act in a befitting manner, which they clearly are not doing. They have this responsibility because when people become disenfranchised with the whole system they tend to vote radically ie for the BNP. As in the rise to power of Hitler. Their little games can have serious consequences, millions of people died to win them, and us, our freedoms which they are… Read more »

N0.5
Reply to  YouPughbe
5, March 2010 12:13 am

Then you no longer have a voice. We are poitical and electoral mire because we allow it….every single issue is there because we chose..it chose not toremove those that make issue. This we we have a choice nationally…and It scares me that 20% of the population willvote negatively..not for what we want and what we need, but for what we are told we do not want and… Read more »

N0.5
Reply to  N0.5
5, March 2010 12:14 am

my apolgise…kids broke my space bar and several keys on the keyboard..

an act of censorship maybe :-)

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined