Isle of Wight 2010 Election: Candidate Q&A: National Issue 1: Should Higher Earners Pay More Tax?

Isle of Wight 2010 Election: Candidate Q&A: National Issue 1: Should Higher Earners Pay More Tax?This is part of a series of eighteen questions from The Democracy Club asked of the Isle of Wight candidates in the 2010 General Election (background).

National statement one: Many people think taxes will have to rise in the next parliament to cut Britain’s budget deficit. If they do, any increases should disproportionately be paid by higher earners.

Candidate Position
Comment
Ian Dunsire (English Democrats Party) agrees
“…but there are not enough "higher earners" to shoulder the whole burden. We must all help reduce the national debt burden in some way – it is not "somebody else’s problem".”




Bob Keats (Green Party) strongly agrees
“Ours is one of the most unequal societies in the developed world. This leads to hiugher prision populations other social ils. A more eqaul society is happier.”




Pete Harris (Independent) is neutral
“Taxation for all is already far too high and a disincentive to hard work. As an alternative we should actively channel cash resources towards positive forms of expendature (NHS etc) and away from negative ones (EU, Benefits culture etc)”




Paul Martin (Middle England Party) agrees
“But this is a side issue really, the challenge is to have a fair benefits system (abused at vast exspense at present) and lock down the offensive banking culture which does more to damage national moral than any other single issue.”




Paul David Randle-Jolliffe (Independent) strongly disagrees
“We should copy Canada, they had severe financial problems, cut Gov spending 60% the whole economy recovered rapidly, services were not badly afected, in the current crisis they were unscathed! we should also cut tax to 20% and attract investment!”




Mark Chiverton  (Labour Party) strongly agrees
“A progressive taxation system where the rich pay their fair share is essential to any just society.”




Michael Tarrant  (UK Independence Party – UKIP) disagrees
“I don’t like the word "disproportionately" – yes high earners should bear some of the cost but not to the extent where we force high earning individuals and companies abroad.”




Jill Wareham  (Liberal Democrats) strongly agrees

Those who didn’t provide responses: Andrew Turner – Conservative, Geof Clynch – BNP and Edward Corby – Independent

The idea for this whole idea came from the excellent The Democracy Club and answers are hosted by the splendid
Election issue of TheyWorkForYou.


Image: konradfoerstner under CC BY 2.0

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
0 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Snowwolf1
12, September 2023 12:03 pm

Trying to keep an open mind, but with the amount of liars, and those with poor memory in the Conservative Government I fear she may do what is best for the party and not the Island, but time will tell.

Angela Hewitt
Reply to  Snowwolf1
13, September 2023 8:21 am

We are already experiencing self interest

Snowwolf1
Reply to  Angela Hewitt
13, September 2023 10:13 am

Why am I not surprised?

Benny C
Reply to  Snowwolf1
16, September 2023 7:43 am

The last Tory Leader was awful as were most of his cabinet. The Tory Govt are finished, unelectable. Why on earth would anyone on the island support this continuation unless there was some form of vested interest?

VentnorLad
12, September 2023 12:54 pm

“Keeping council tax increases to the lowest possible level“ along with “prepared to make the right – and sometimes difficult – decisions” sounds like a precursor to “unavoidable and regrettable cuts to non-statutory services” in the near future.

Angela Hewitt
13, September 2023 8:20 am

It will be a real shot in the foot as the nasty party expose themselves for what they truly are.

tomtelford
13, September 2023 8:25 am

Who voted for this?

Bring back the Island Deal. Oh hang on that was never delivered by previous Conservative government and seems to have slipped off the Conservative council group menu.

Angela Hewitt
13, September 2023 11:53 am

The two items below can only be in conflcet with each other. Reuducing the number of schools means more cars on the road early morning to get children to school. Did you notice how quiet the roads were during the summer break between 8 and 9am 2Tackle the increasing crisis in school place planning, having regard for the need to avoid an adverse impact on the funding… Read more »

joe90
13, September 2023 12:11 pm

I am waiting to see their flagship development they keep shouting about on camp hill prison, lets see how quick they can build there or was the Alliance telling the truth and the council do not own the land. Remember Robinson kept on about this lets see if he pushes it now and measure him on that for the coming elections or just another Tory lie

Tim
13, September 2023 4:04 pm

Yet still the “Elephant in the Room” of us islanders being held to ransom by the ferry companies remains a taboo subject!

VentnorLad
Reply to  Tim
13, September 2023 4:30 pm

Taboo? Far from it.

I find the phrase “held to ransom by the ferry companies” a useful tool for identifying people I wish to avoid in conversation.

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined