Nick chase with family

Isle of Wight ‘dinosaur hunter’ honoured with prestigious international award

The council share this latest news. Ed


The Isle of Wight’s very own ‘dinosaur hunter’, Nick Chase, has been given a prestigious international award by the Palaeontological Association.

Nick has been a familiar figure on the beaches of the south coast of the Island three decades.

He has braved bad weather, heavy seas and thick mud, on a daily basis, to search for dinosaur bones and other fossils washed out from the cliffs. The results have been spectacular and have made Nick the country’s leading discoverer of British dinosaur material.

Mary Anning Award
To mark this achievement he was presented with the prestigious Mary Anning Award by the Palaeontological Association on Saturday 20 October. Vice president of the association, Professor Richard Twitchett of the Natural History Museum, London, made the presentation.

Nick Chase sketching as a dinosaur excavation proceeds

The award, named after the famous Victorian fossil hunter from the Jurassic Coast is given by the association to amateurs who have made a remarkable contribution to the science. People are nominated from around the world making it a prize of international standing.

Lockwood: “Modern-day Mary Anning”
Dr Jeremy Lockwood, chair of the Friends of Dinosaur Isle, said:

“It is so fitting that Nick has received this award, because although he’s a man and doesn’t have a little dog, he is in many other ways just like a modern-day Mary Anning, with a remarkable gift for seeking out dinosaurs.

“Nick is also such a generous man, he not only donates wonderful fossils to museums but always has time to talk to people on the beach and encourage interested children by giving them pieces of dinosaur bone.”

Large backbone vertebrae from a huge Iguanodon

The country’s most prolific discoverer of British dinosaurs
Over the years Nick has chalked up an impressive list of finds making him the country’s most prolific discoverer of British dinosaurs.

These include several almost complete dinosaur skeletons which have generated huge interest from university and museum researchers.

The number of finds is mind-boggling and includes rare fossils of all sorts of animals. Nick even found a new species of spider in 125 million year old amber which was named after him.

Nick has donated his finds to the Natural History Museum in London, and mainly to Dinosaur Isle Museum at Sandown.

Munt: Donated a great deal to museum
Dr Martin Munt, curator of Dinosaur Isle Museum, said:

“So much of what Nick has found has been donated to the museum, that it could be said that its existence today is in no small part owed to him. It shows just how important local collectors are to the continued growth of the museum.

“It was in recognition of Nick’s contribution that we nominated him for this award.”

Hobart: “A very well deserved award”
Cabinet member for environment and heritage, Councillor John Hobart, said:

“This is great news that Nick has been recognised for the impact he has had not only on the Island but internationally, through his rare fossil finds, and he has no doubt inspired new generations to consider following in his footsteps. A very well deserved award.”

Nick receiving award from Richard Twitchett (left)

Nick feels the driving force behind his collecting is to conserve the Island’s heritage so that future generations can better understand how the planet we live on today has developed. The Island is in a unique position to preserve this legacy as it is one of the top places for dinosaur finds in the world.

Over the years the Island has provided many of the fossils that have helped to change scientific understanding of the Cretaceous world of the dinosaurs and set many young students on a paleontological career path. New exciting fossils are still regularly being found.

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
0 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
davidwalter
29, August 2014 1:32 pm

The Scrutiny Committee having agreed that resolution, is the Full Council legally bound by that decision or may it (in law) ignore it?

Colin
Reply to  Sally Perry
30, August 2014 8:59 am

quote “without adherence to formal consultation time periods and outcomes the Council’s reputation will be entirely undermined and perhaps raise legal risks.” unquote

Umm, I think the council’s reputation is long gone. It matters not who is in charge and of course it was always the last lot.

Matthew James Martin
Reply to  Colin
31, August 2014 8:51 am

To address your quote Colin ;- ”Umm, I think the council’s reputation is long gone. It matters not who is in charge and of course it was always the last lot.” I don’t understand why you say this? I think you’ve missed a few things here Colin perhaps? We all do it from time to time of course. From what I gather, St Helen’s Parish Council has… Read more »

Matthew James Martin
31, August 2014 8:34 am

This proposal has to be continuously opposed. If this measure is approved, it will open up a whole can of worms over other issues and liberties everybody should have a basic right to. My thanks goes to Councillor Lumley and the Scrutiny Committee once again.

davidwalter
31, August 2014 3:48 pm

Rules that restrict the freedom of people to go about their lives, work and recreation should only be considered if the case is compelling. From all I’ve read, the case is almost non-existent, let alone compelling. It has all become a stupid political battle in which the losers will be the public. What is the problem with saying “OK, bad idea, let’s drop it chaps”?

Food for Thought
31, August 2014 6:35 pm

It is a statutory requirement to have a scrutiny committee. Yet there is no requirement to act of the committee’s recommendations. Why therefore even bother having a committee? Just another Government initiative that seems to have no clout. (This was a labour initiative). When scrutiny works as intended then it is a useful tool but both the last ruling party and the current one both ignore recommendations… Read more »

retired Hack
Reply to  Food for Thought
31, August 2014 6:55 pm

The barrister was absent from the Executive meeting in question.

Food for Thought
Reply to  retired Hack
31, August 2014 7:18 pm

Thanks R.H. No wonder a stupid decision was made.

Robbo
Reply to  Food for Thought
3, September 2014 8:38 am

Though the barrister is the councillor for St Helens, favours the Order, and no doubt had influence behind the scenes.

tiki
2, September 2014 6:10 pm

In some countries dogs have to be kept on leads at ALL times. There are more important issues to worry about.

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined