nick belfitt

Isle of Wight LibDems: More cash for NHS, legalisation of Cannabis, triple-locked pension

Nick shares this latest release on behalf of the Isle of Wight Liberal Democrats. Ed


Nick Belfitt says,

“Lib Dems have listened and we will put the Isle of Wight first.”

Liberal Democrat Parliamentary Candidate, Nick Belfitt, today announced that his party will seek to give a voice to Islanders by fighting for an English Island Policy in Westminster.

The Isle of Wight Liberal Democrats were already in consultation with the Federal Party about an English Island Policy before the General Election was announced, but now he says he will take the issue straight to Westminster if elected.

Putting the Island first
Nick Belfitt said:

“If the local elections show us anything, it’s that there are many who want to see the Island’s voice returned. Fifteen years under Tory rule has meant that the Island’s voice is completely lost.

“Many still believe the national political parties will not fight for the Island. As someone who grew up on the Island, I want to show people that we have listened and we will put the Island first.

“Our English Island Policy takes what is needed to change from the local level to the national level.“

The Liberal Democrats argue they are the only party with a working document on bringing the Isle of Wight and other English offshore islands up to the same funding and standards currently enjoyed in Scottish Isles.

Island Campaign
As part of the call Nick Belfitt added that the party had written to the Independent Councillors for their support on the issue. The party confirmed that Independent Councillor John Medland has backed the proposal.

The English Island Policy, which was first proposed in January 2017, will form part of what the party is calling their Island Campaign.

Election promises
Other proposals the Liberal Democrats have confirmed for the Island:

  • £7bn investment in education with £25m support directly to Island Schools, including rejection of academies.
  • £6bn Heath Care support via a 1p on the pound tax with £19.7m going to Island NHS keeping services on the Island.
  • Protection of the Triple-locked pension
  • Creating a discounted bus pass for 16-21 year olds, giving a 66% discount
  • Legalisation of Cannabis, bringing in £1b revenue nationally, through regulation and taxation.

The Liberal Democrats have confirmed Mr Belfitt will be visiting towns around the Island to listen and speak to Islanders about the proposals. The Liberal Democrats will be in Newport this Saturday 20th from 10am.

Image: © With kind permission of Allan Marsh

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
16 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Geoff Brodie
17, May 2017 9:28 am

If the local elections show us anything, it is that with only 42 votes in his home ward Mr Belfitt is a no-hoper.

And of course he would only write to Independent councillors like Mr Medland. There are probably still quite a few card-carrying LibDem members within their ranks. Medland, Howe, Smart…….

Billy Builder
Reply to  Geoff Brodie
17, May 2017 12:00 pm

Geoff, you are quite right of course, most of the Independents are closet LibDems, as are the vast majority of voters who voted for them on 8th May. With those voters, together the 38% of the Island who voted Remain and the unknown percentage who don’t want a Tory/UKIP hard BRexit, then I would think that Nick will do very well. Certainly much better than a party… Read more »

Simon Haytack
Reply to  Billy Builder
17, May 2017 1:32 pm

Renewable energy, education for everyone, well funded public services, protection for the poorest members of society. Labour isn’t taking us back to the 1970s, it’s bringing us into the 21st century.

What Len McCluskey actually said this morning was that Labour was “in with a real chance.” Don’t believe everything you read in the media.

Billy Builder
Reply to  Simon Haytack
17, May 2017 1:50 pm

The union boss had told Politico 1 hour after the Labour manifesto was published that a Labour victory would be “extraordinary” and suggested winning just 200 seats would be a “successful” result. A Labour win would massively increase the deficit by 100+ billion which when added to the 100+ billion required for a Labour/Tory/UKIP BRexit would cripple the country even more than a Tory/UKIP 100+ billion BRexit… Read more »

sandman
Reply to  Geoff Brodie
17, May 2017 7:42 pm

Mr Critchley 154 no-hoper too. Hardly going to dent the Tory armour is it Lol.

georgebull
17, May 2017 1:29 pm

In the interests of balance, I think it only fair that the article should also have mentioned other Lib Dem headline policies to include opposing Brexit, extending the Syrian Refugee programme to 50,000 refugees over the next 5 years, ban the sale of diesel cars and vans by 2025 and repeal security services right to suspects internet history. So, the first two should play well on the… Read more »

Billy Builder
Reply to  georgebull
17, May 2017 1:57 pm

I don’t really think that the LibDems are trying to appeal to the far left / right voters who are determined to cut off their nose to spite their face. They are going for the middle of the road voter who likes a free open society, likes to be inclusive and welcoming, wants to support vulnerable and help those in need.

georgebull
Reply to  Billy Builder
17, May 2017 4:34 pm

Billy, You misunderstand my point. Belfitt seems to be cherry picking policies whci will appeal to Islanders and avoiding advocating NATIONAL policies which will be totally at odds with the majority of island voters. Which is not an entirely clear representation of the party position. Or am I missing something? Would be ironic if the Island’s 62% vote to leave returned a politician whose party is committed… Read more »

Billy Builder
Reply to  georgebull
17, May 2017 5:51 pm

George, I would suggest that all people will highlight those aspects of their position that support their cause, whilst downplaying aspects that their current audience might not like as much. With regard to irony, is it ironic that most MP’s fail to get 50% of the vote and very rarely get more than 33% of the their electorate to support them. With regard to the 62%, then… Read more »

paludian
Reply to  Billy Builder
17, May 2017 7:41 pm

Mr Builder, I am afraid that I cannot reconcile your logic. Many people make the political journey from left to right as they grow up and grow older. As Lloyd-George probably said, “A young man who isn’t a socialist hasn’t got a heart; an old man who is a socialist hasn’t got a head. This has to be true because without this change of heart, your 2%… Read more »

Billy Builder
Reply to  Billy Builder
17, May 2017 7:52 pm

That goes contrary to a paper published on the BBC today which finds that the greater your educational attainment the more likely you are to vote centre-left.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2017-39936927

doughnut
17, May 2017 3:41 pm

I cannot believe that any political party is using legalisation of cannabis as a manifesto promise. You could promise the moon Mr Belfitt but with that in your party’s manifesto I will NEVER vote for you.

Caconym
18, May 2017 8:14 am

The Lib-Dems need to wake up and smell the coffee. The Brexit boat has sailed. What we need is a Government that will ensure that we get the best deal possible. That won’t be the Tories who will throw us off the cliff with an ultra hard Brexit, by the way. Incidentally, the Tory manifesto is starting to look more like a suicide note. Ending the pension… Read more »

Billy Builder
Reply to  Caconym
18, May 2017 8:40 am

Suruk, the BRexit vote has happened, and we’re currently heading for the hardest of hard Tory/UKIP BRexits, which certainly was not voted for. What we need now is as stronger presence in Parliament as possible of MP’s willing to fight to prevent the hard BRexit abyss. And we need to secure a second referendum for the people to decided on the BRexit final agreement in line with… Read more »

Caconym
Reply to  Billy Builder
18, May 2017 9:36 am

The Lib Dem proposal is, as you say, to hold a referendum on the deal.

What you fail to mention is that if the referendum on the deal is rejected, then Brexit is scrapped.

So it is *exactly* another in/out referendum as people would vote on that basis rather than if the deal is acceptable, or not.

Billy Builder
Reply to  Caconym
18, May 2017 9:56 am

Suruk, If you ask a supplier to supply a piece of string, and when delivered that piece of string does not meet your requirement then you would send it back. We had a referendum on ‘BRexit’ with absolutely no idea what ‘BRexit’ meant. It is absolutely reasonable that once we know what BRexit means we should have the opportunity to accept or reject it. The result of… Read more »

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined