Monopoly board pay income tax

Isle of Wight’s restaurants targeted in tax cheat crackdown

Expected to recover more than £2.5 million, the taskforce will target those who do not pay the right amount of tax in restaurants in the South East and Solent.

“We will not tolerate tax evasion”
Taskforces are specialist teams that undertake intensive bursts of activity in specific high risk trade sectors and locations in the UK. The teams will visit traders to examine their records and carry out other investigations.

David Gauke, the Exchequer Secretary, said: “We have made it clear that we will not tolerate tax evasion and we are determined to crack down on the minority who choose to break the rules. Everyone needs to pay the taxes they owe in full. It is not fair that at a time when most hard-working people are paying the right tax, others are trying to get out of paying what they should.”

Be warned that HMRC is coming after you
HMRC’s Mike Eland, Director General Enforcement and Compliance, said: “This taskforces bring together specialists from across HMRC to find people who are not paying what they should. If you have paid all your taxes you have nothing to worry about. But for those deliberately evading tax, be warned that HMRC is coming after you.

“This is not an empty threat – HMRC can and will track you down if you choose to break the rules. We are on target to collect more than £50 million as a result of taskforces launched in 2011/12.”

HMRC has launched 30 taskforces since May 2011.

Tackling tax evasion, avoidance and fraud
Taskforces are a result of the Government’s £917 million spending review investment to tackle tax evasion, avoidance and fraud from 2011/12, which aims to raise an additional £7 billion each year by 2014/15.

If you are aware of someone who is evading their taxes you can tell HMRC via the Tax Evasion Hotline by phone, on 0800 788 887, email or by post. Full details can be found at www.hmrc.gov.uk

Image: Tax Brackets under CC BY 2.0

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
4 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Itch you can't scratch
18, November 2010 2:11 pm

Well no surprise there then. The monkeys have applauded the organ grinder. Busby (who now lives with David) will keep her mouth shut not only to protect him but to keep her job. It’s all so horribly ugly and predictable.Don’t forget to say an extra “thankyou baby Jesus” David at church cos yer a christian aren’t you? If thats whats waiting in heaven I won’t bother thanks.… Read more »

Robbo
Reply to  Itch you can't scratch
18, November 2010 3:10 pm

No surprise at all. An ‘investigation’ by someone who, with the best will in the world wasn’t going to be able to find against the the leader of the council if they wanted their career to continue unhindered.

docile denny
Reply to  Itch you can't scratch
21, November 2010 3:41 pm

Little concerned here reading this blog. Are you saying that Rachel lives with David Pugh? A council employee living with the leader of the council? I am sorry but have these two got no sense whatsoever. What does it look like to the outside world, no doubt her job is safe and she isn’t one of the 300 under threat. [part of comment removed by moderator].

OAP
Reply to  docile denny
21, November 2010 5:08 pm

Just started reading all this and yes, it is my understanding that David Pugh now lives with Rachel Busby [part of comment removed by moderator].

No.5
Reply to  OAP
21, November 2010 7:37 pm

So What.

docile denny
Reply to  No.5
21, November 2010 7:56 pm

So what? David Pugh takes the moral high ground against others but when it is him it somehow is different. Let’s wait and see the outcome of the next case against him.

No.5
Reply to  No.5
21, November 2010 8:25 pm

Are you saying he’s not allowed to have a girlfriend?

I don’t think its Pugh taking the moral high ground ( if such a thing exists)..its you!

Covert they ass
Reply to  No.5
21, November 2010 9:16 pm

He hasn’t got girlfriend No 5, he has someone elses wife. Now i agree to a point with “so what” but he is arrogant and judgmental over others, he is a christian and it has over tones for his and her employment. She had a paid weeks bed rest didn’t she after the “bust up” A week off that we paid for. So it does matter from… Read more »

OAP
Reply to  No.5
21, November 2010 10:18 pm

What do you mean ‘so what’ No 5?

I can’t make up my mind if you are really as arrogant and self-opinionated as you make yourself out to be or if you do it deliberately for your own amusement.

No.5
Reply to  No.5
21, November 2010 11:08 pm

what the hell difference does it make who Pugh lives with…..all this personality assasination detracts from the real job of getting him out of a job based on his inability to run a council.

I find it demeening that others stoop to levels that they criticize in others

No.5
Reply to  No.5
21, November 2010 11:10 pm

I don’t beleive that this is true…and again, if it is, so what!!!! loads of ‘married’ people live with other people

docile denny
Reply to  No.5
22, November 2010 7:40 am

David Pugh uses the moral highground when it suits him – in other words to get where he wants. He has used it against colleagues to get rid of them. He is a judgemental of others but then does what he condems in others himself. As for what is wrong in living with a married employee of the council, come on No5 HE IS THE LEADER. What… Read more »

No.5
Reply to  OAP
22, November 2010 9:49 am

Then an employment tribunial or standards will get another report.

But you are just guessing this is happening and by slinging moral muck about you are proving yourself as despicable as he is.

The gossip squad are back

Known
18, November 2010 3:42 pm

Congratulations to whomever compiled this report. Hardly a mention of VentnorBlog in there (or at least in what we plebs can read!). Quite a spectacular achievement considering without VB publishing their first story, none of this would have come to light in the first place!

Joan L
19, November 2010 7:31 am

Thanks for such clear reporting. Laying it all open for all to read and understand. The island’s and most other local area’s never seen anything like it.

steve s
19, November 2010 7:38 am

‘…and subsequently posted on an internet video sharing website called “You tube”‘ :-)

Who’s Gazza?!

romeantique
21, November 2010 12:04 pm

This heavily redacted document is no more than the opinion of the Principle Lawyer employed by the Isle of Wight Council. If they paid me what they pay him I would certainly tell them what they want to hear. This whole question is pivotal on whether Pugh was acting as leader of the council during the incident in the car park. He himself consulted the monitoring officer… Read more »

romeantique
Reply to  romeantique
21, November 2010 12:12 pm

Also what was the actual previous case which the legal advise from the Council Officer used to block consideration of the actual swearing incident itself?

The councillors feel it is flawed as it was based on a judgement in another case which has subsequently been criticised.

What is this case?

I now pronounce you…
22, November 2010 8:09 am

So No 5 loads of ‘married people’ live with other people. Are you suggesting that because a sizable numbers of people do something that makes it acceptable maybe even desirable? Numbers cancel responsibilities do they? The mess of divorce and the fall out for all concerned is ok cos….well….lots do it. [part of comment removed by moderator] Having sad that, the context here is also important. Busby… Read more »

No.5
Reply to  I now pronounce you…
22, November 2010 9:45 am

Get over yourself…..thousands of people have second lives very successfully and you have no grounds for your baseless assumptions.

romeantique
Reply to  I now pronounce you…
22, November 2010 11:39 am

Is Pugh a Freemason?

Barney McGrew
Reply to  romeantique
22, November 2010 1:18 pm

No – they wouldn’t have him.

romeantique
22, November 2010 10:29 am

The media management was considered necessary as a damage limitation exercise due to the Council leaders involvement in anti-social behaviour bringing the council into disrepute. Yet we are told David Pugh wasn’t on duty as Council leader. Therefore his actions can bring the Council into disrepute regardless of their claims that he wasn’t on duty. This is inconsistent, as usual they are having their cake and eating… Read more »

Black Dog
22, November 2010 4:35 pm

I have read all your comments about on the matter and find it all very informative. If I were David Pugh I would be very very worried as he is no longer in control of his own destiny, it is his partner Ms. Busby that has the upper hand from here on in. Think about – David Pugh is now and through his own doing is between… Read more »

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined