Ventnor Coastal Centre

IWC detail ‘misleading comments’ in Coastal Centre survey they banned

After the report of last night’s Ventnor Town Council (VTC) meeting, where members of the VTC accused the Isle of Wight council of ‘arrogance’ after banning VTC’s Coastal Centre survey from the library, we contacted IW council to find out which parts of the VTC survey they felt were the ‘misleading comments’.

Below is their reply in full – Ed.


As you probably know, the leaflet cannot be displayed at Ventnor Library as it contravenes our leaflets policy in that it is not only inaccurate and misleading, it is also a campaign leaflet which only tells one side of an argument. Furthermore, it contains political overtones which is also unacceptable under the policy.

As regards your specific question, the following aspects are not just misleading but in some cases inarguably incorrect statements from the author. There are other questionable statements in the leaflet but these examples give us most concern.

  • The Green (Salisbury Gardens) has never been considered to be part of this disposal.
  • The commissioning manager for adult and community learning services has declined a request to formally endorse the bid. In the circumstances it is wrong to use his quote and the council’s logo under the headline ‘Strong Support’ The bid is not supported by the Isle of Wight Council.
  • Irrespective of who may have purchased the property historically, it legally passed to and is owned by Isle of Wight Council on behalf of all Island residents and all Island residents have contributed to its maintenance and upkeep. It is wrong to declare ‘It’s Ventnor’s!’ Similarly, it is also wrong to state as fact that any money raised would be spent ‘elsewhere’ of Ventnor. How and where any receipt may be spent is undecided.
  • There is no intention, nor has there ever been, to sell Blackgang Chine car park to Southern Vectis or at less than market value.
  • We have also made it clear any special purchase is based on full market value based on the reports of two independent valuations.
  • Ventnor Town Council’s Business case appears to be predicated on the IW Council gifting them the building and without having agreed the bid with the IW Council before it was submitted. There is no such commitment or likelihood of gifting the property.
Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
15 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
vitabrevis
21, February 2024 4:40 pm

Clever, isn’t it? Government squeezes LAs so that they have to shuffle services off to local councils who are not restricted in the precept increases they can apply. Government decrees rises in Minimum Wage which dosn’t cost government a penny as it’s paid by employers, but gov gets increased tax and NI revenue as all wages have to go up to maintain differentials. Then they (and their… Read more »

Benny C
21, February 2024 8:19 pm

Well it’s a start. When the high st is crumbling, costing jobs and revenue, when the roads are crumbling, adding risk and damaging perceptions, when enterprise most needs support to help it employ more people and add more value, the Town Councils response was? A tide bell.

VentnorLad
Reply to  Benny C
21, February 2024 9:52 pm

Let’s not try suggesting that VTC should be doing things that IWC are responsible for.

And I thought the tide bell was a better idea than the town crier. Not a good idea. Just better than the appalling one.

Benny C
Reply to  VentnorLad
22, February 2024 5:02 am

Surely if the energy expended on a bell was expended gettingvIOWC to do their job maybe Ventnor would be in better shape. It’s like VTC is operating in some kind of parallel world. They need to get the basics in order, work out and deliver what makes the most positive impacts ie long term real improvement that will endure and foster growth. A bell and a town… Read more »

ian123
Reply to  Benny C
22, February 2024 7:44 am

I agree with you about the Crier, and it is welcome that the council has abandoned this proposal. But the tide bells around the UK are an imaginative arts project, that would have fitted well with Ventnor’s growing reputation as a creative centre, and helped attract visitors to the town. The bell itself (costing tens of £thousands) would have been entirely privately funded by the arts trust… Read more »

Benny C
Reply to  ian123
24, February 2024 9:37 pm

I asked 10 mates who travel extensively for fun in the U.K. (and who know and like a good cultural experience when they see one) if a tide bell would make a difference to their choices. All but two laughed. I think the world may have moved on a bit and this is emperors new clothes territory. Next we Will be told our money is being invested… Read more »

Tim
22, February 2024 10:12 am

Still wasting money on fripperies then!

Benny C
Reply to  Tim
24, February 2024 9:38 pm

Head in hands.

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined