No written in white paint on road

Letter: Isle of Wight Road Races will adversely affect residents and visitors

OnTheWight always welcomes a Letter to the Editor to share with our readers – unsurprisingly they don’t always reflect the views of this publication. If you have something you’d like to share, get in touch and of course, your considered comments are welcome below.

This from Donella East, a West Wight resident. Ed


Firstly, why is it that it is assumed that the ‘Diamond Races’ and ‘The Isle of Wight Road Races’ is a done deal and will go ahead?

If this is so then I am full of righteous indignation that the people who it will adversely affect, and is at the moment affecting, due to various youngsters with their souped-up motors already in practice every day, are the people who live in the area of West Wight.

Lack of consultation
Where has been the consultation with residents and local authority? We have had no such consultation and going by the already published comments through News On The Wight, the majority are totally against it for many and varied legitimate reasons.

I have a long list of reasons myself and at the top is:

  • Noise pollution
  • Air pollution
  • Danger to children and people in general
  • Danger to wildlife
  • Disruption by having roads closed
  • Loss of visitors who come to the Island for peace and quiet
  • Unsafe walking and cycling

Young and old will oppose
As usual it is the minority who are the loudest who are listened to. Take a poll please. Young and old will oppose this dreadful move to spoil our gloriously beautiful Island.

I want my grandchildren’s, children’s, children to come here in a hundred years time and marvel at the clean air and the natural beauty, with nothing of the landscape having changed a lot in that time.

Hopefully by then we shall have only silent and much cleaner electric motor vehicles. Imagine!

Image: foilman under CC BY 2.0


Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
21 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
mat
7, October 2014 1:27 pm

Wightlink are attempting to hijack the issue of ferries to and from the island and control of the routes. Their action is a diversion. They have the audacity to use their monopoly power against the debate at the highest level. They should be ignored by their attempts to infringe on the rights of the public to be heard through their MP voicing their concerns in Parliament. An… Read more »

Josh Dinsdale
7, October 2014 1:49 pm

“But legislation to protect the environment must take into account the need to protect the Island’s economy.”

Hahahaha, that’s the funniest thing I’ve read all week. Wightlink are all about protecting their own interest, err I mean the Islands economy…

Vix
7, October 2014 9:31 pm

Does Wightlink list what their concerns are and what ‘dangers’ a MCZ will bring? Because without specifics, it reads like loaded economic scaremongering.

tryme
Reply to  Vix
8, October 2014 6:34 am

The ease and confidence with which Wightlink refer to AT speaking on their behalf in the Ho of Commons is very galling, when Islanders struggle so hard to get to that stage with him. Their quote/link does not in fact directly support their case, but seems aimed at bouncing him into doing their bidding. David Thornton might have thought he was saying something neutral – visitors need… Read more »

Mark Francis
8, October 2014 9:54 am

What new port facilities are needed – if any?

Joe
Reply to  Mark Francis
8, October 2014 10:08 am

A new port would allow us to have another ferry company :-)

Cynic
Reply to  Joe
8, October 2014 11:36 am

You can get the same result by forcing WL and RF to share port facilities both sides of the Solent.

This would break the monopolies both companies have on their routes.

Richard
8, October 2014 12:13 pm

Here is a brilliant explaination of Marine Protected Areas, it is in cartoon form so even Wightlink should be able to understand it: http://grist.org/living/everything-you-ever-wanted-to-know-about-marine-protected-areas/

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined