Artist impression of Seaclose Park plans - Matthew Price

New scheme could see Newport FC back in the heart of the town: Have your say

Isle of Wight Councillor for Newport North – Matt Price – is seeking public feedback on a new proposal to rehome the County Town’s football club at a rejuvenated Seaclose Park, with expanded boundaries.

Under the scheme, Newport Football Club (FC) would return to the parish of Newport (rather than move to its approved new ground at the Racecourse), as part of a series of recreational improvements to Seaclose aimed at encouraging greater community use of the park.

Upgrade skatepark with new ramps and pump track
The other significant project would be a major upgrade to Seaclose’s skatepark facility, to include new ramps and a pump track, with dips, bumps and jumps (instead of just ramps) for riders on any set of wheels to skate, cycle or roll around.

More widely, football and cricket pitches would be marked out in other areas of the park. There would also be new removable sports equipment introduced and walking and cycling routes upgraded.

New football ground
The centrepiece of the plan is a new football ground with a grandstand, clubhouse, floodlights and the latest all-weather pitch – in the south-western corner of the park – that would be available for organised community use, while providing a new home for Newport FC who are currently hosted by footballing rivals East Cowes Vics.

Matt said the Seaclose idea came about during previous discussions about the relocation of Newport FC as part of plans for a retail park at the club’s former home at St George’s Park. Although the developer has permission for a new ground at the Racecourse at Whippingham, Matt believes the Seaclose alternative should be revisited as it had the potential to provide much wider community benefit.

Back to the heart of the town
Crucially for Newport FC fans, the new location – just a short, walk or cycle from the town centre – would bring the 130-year-old club much closer to the heart of Newport than the consented Racecourse scheme.

The new ground – to the south of the planning offices and to the west of the bowling green – would continue to be owned by the Isle of Wight Council. Newport FC would pay a peppercorn rent (as anchor tenant), with a condition that other community uses – including women’s football, youth football and also sport for those with disabilities – should take place at the venue.

Price: An excellent recreational facility for wider community us
Speaking after a recent meeting of Newport and Carisbrooke Community Council – at which he mentioned the plans – Matt said,

“Having seen off proposals to build 40 houses on land at Seaclose Park, it is right that we now look at how sports and recreational provision can be enhanced in this location. We have the opportunity to create both a top-class new home for Newport FC and also an excellent recreational facility for wider community use, along with a significantly improved skatepark (incorporating a pump track), similar to what has been put forward in Freshwater. It is well worth exploring, particularly as we need more outdoor facilities for people of all ages to enjoy.

“As local member, I can see that providing a new football ground in either location would work, but the Seaclose alternative ensures that Newport FC remains in Newport, while also being much more accessible and offering greater immediate community benefits.

“The Seaclose option incorporates all the facilities included in the Racecourse plan – and more – so ultimately we have to decide which of these locations would be best.

“I am also keen to see the area defined as Seaclose Park expanded to incorporate (1) Medina Arboretum and (2) under-utilised sports pitches at Medina College, along with areas of open space alongside these. This would reflect the wider public use of this area as a whole.”

Welcomed by supporters
The Seaclose alternative for Newport FC is already supported, in principle, by the Newport FC Supporters Trust, while Matt said initial feedback from other elected members in the wider Newport and Carisbrooke parish area had also been positive.

However, Matt said any new facility must not adversely affect the future of the Isle of Wight Festival or other established uses at Seaclose Park. He added,

“The area proposed for the new football ground sits to the south of the main space used for hosting the Festival, but I recognise it is used for providing backstage support. However, I believe this proposal can actually enhance and complement the festival site by providing additional hard-standing backstage hospitality and accommodation. The scheme has been worked up with the festival’s requirements in mind.

“I am keen to hear the views of residents, sports clubs and community organisations – and fellow elected members – before reaching a final view. In particular, it is important that any enhancements to Seaclose Park complement of all the existing uses of this wider area, given how much this recreational space is already enjoyed by many people locally. I do think that there is a real opportunity here to reinvigorate Seaclose as a recreational and sporting hub, along with a clubhouse that could also serve as a much-needed community centre for Fairlee.

“This scheme could also complement – and be a catalyst for – the ambitions of the wider Newport Harbour Masterplan.”

Westhorpe: I welcome Cllr Price’s initiative
Peter Westhorpe, Secretary of Newport FC Supporters’ Trust, added,

“A move to Whippingham would still give us a high-quality new ground, but I believe supporters would prefer this closer to the town centre if this could be delivered swiftly.

“Moving to Seaclose and bringing the club back into Newport would have its attractions for supporters and as such I welcome Cllr Price’s initiative.”

Wake: Happy to keep Seaclose alternative on the table for now
Tony Wake, chairman of Newport Football Club and director of South Coast Leisure said,

“The Racecourse site is where we have planned to relocate the club and we expect to make a start on the build towards the end of the summer but, time permitting, I am happy to keep the Seaclose alternative on the table for now should the Council and the public agree it is better option.”

A range of local community organisations and educational providers have already expressed an interest in using the new football ground facility.

Share your views
To provide feedback to Matt on this proposal, please visit the Website or email matthewpriceisleofwight@gmail.com by Monday 1st March.


News shared by Matthew Price, in his own words. Ed

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
6 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
davidwalter
29, August 2014 1:32 pm

The Scrutiny Committee having agreed that resolution, is the Full Council legally bound by that decision or may it (in law) ignore it?

Colin
Reply to  Sally Perry
30, August 2014 8:59 am

quote “without adherence to formal consultation time periods and outcomes the Council’s reputation will be entirely undermined and perhaps raise legal risks.” unquote

Umm, I think the council’s reputation is long gone. It matters not who is in charge and of course it was always the last lot.

Matthew James Martin
Reply to  Colin
31, August 2014 8:51 am

To address your quote Colin ;- ”Umm, I think the council’s reputation is long gone. It matters not who is in charge and of course it was always the last lot.” I don’t understand why you say this? I think you’ve missed a few things here Colin perhaps? We all do it from time to time of course. From what I gather, St Helen’s Parish Council has… Read more »

Matthew James Martin
31, August 2014 8:34 am

This proposal has to be continuously opposed. If this measure is approved, it will open up a whole can of worms over other issues and liberties everybody should have a basic right to. My thanks goes to Councillor Lumley and the Scrutiny Committee once again.

davidwalter
31, August 2014 3:48 pm

Rules that restrict the freedom of people to go about their lives, work and recreation should only be considered if the case is compelling. From all I’ve read, the case is almost non-existent, let alone compelling. It has all become a stupid political battle in which the losers will be the public. What is the problem with saying “OK, bad idea, let’s drop it chaps”?

Food for Thought
31, August 2014 6:35 pm

It is a statutory requirement to have a scrutiny committee. Yet there is no requirement to act of the committee’s recommendations. Why therefore even bother having a committee? Just another Government initiative that seems to have no clout. (This was a labour initiative). When scrutiny works as intended then it is a useful tool but both the last ruling party and the current one both ignore recommendations… Read more »

retired Hack
Reply to  Food for Thought
31, August 2014 6:55 pm

The barrister was absent from the Executive meeting in question.

Food for Thought
Reply to  retired Hack
31, August 2014 7:18 pm

Thanks R.H. No wonder a stupid decision was made.

Robbo
Reply to  Food for Thought
3, September 2014 8:38 am

Though the barrister is the councillor for St Helens, favours the Order, and no doubt had influence behind the scenes.

tiki
2, September 2014 6:10 pm

In some countries dogs have to be kept on leads at ALL times. There are more important issues to worry about.

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined