Police And Partner Agencies Work To Help Traffic Egress From Festival

This in from the Police, in their own words. Ed

Traffic Jam:Detailed plans are in place to keep transport and people moving as the Isle of Wight Festival comes to a close today (Sunday).

A key feature of the plan involves controlling egress from the campsite, particularly during the main commuter time of 7.30am-9am on Monday morning, to help residents travel as freely as possible.

The festival camp sites will be monitored between these times so traffic does not overwhelm the road network.

Agencies working together
The event organisers continue to work with agencies including the police, Isle of Wight Council and transport operators to prevent the congestion encountered at the start of the event at Seaclose Park, Newport.

Other steps include arranging a fleet of more than 100 4X4 vehicles to help festival traffic leave the campsite.

All transport companies are reporting increased activity as festival goers are apparently leaving the site early and amending their travel plans.

Enhanced ferry timetables
Wightlink is running an enhanced timetable today and tomorrow on the Fishbourne to Portsmouth car ferry and the Ryde to Portsmouth catamaran.

Red Funnel terminal operations manager Darren Button said there were currently no issues affecting crossings. Extra sailings would be in operation from this evening into Monday and customers are advised to check the website below.

Paul Hartigan Southern Vectis general manager said: “We are working closely with organisers, the police and the council to get people on and off site and to the ferry terminals as quickly as possible. We are doing this in a way that does not affect the network and the school lift will operate tomorrow (Monday) as scheduled.”

Keeping disruption to minimum
Stuart Love, IW Council director of economy and the environment, said: “As you can imagine this is a constantly evolving situation but I can assure residents and festival go-ers that all agencies we are working together to implement arrangements designed to keep disruption to minimum.

“Regulating movement from the car parks – including those established at Brickfields and Robin Hill on Friday – should mean that the situation today and Monday will be very different to that on Thursday and Friday when the congestion was unacceptable.”

Drafted in extra Police
Chief Inspector Nick Heelan, local police commander, said: “Getting people home safely and returning the local roads and community to normality as quickly as we can is our priority.

“We have extra officers drafted in from the mainland today to work with marshals to keep traffic moving.

“We are working very closely with the organisers, the council and other agencies to minimise disruption, and have every resource available doing everything possible to keep people safe and moving.”

Image: MyLifeStory under CC BY 2.0

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
29 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Braveheart
24, June 2012 2:37 pm

I wish all those assisting with the mass exodus from the Festival both today and tomorrow good luck, and a safe journey home to all those who ventured down to the Island for the 2012 Festval.

Neil Hartland
24, June 2012 4:33 pm

I just got back from trying to help a guy get his car out from a field off Whippingham Road.I was responding to his call for help on Facebook because he had his pregnant girlfriend waiting for him at Fishbourne. Me and a friend (who has a 4 x 4)were not allowed onto the field itself but ween we walked in we could see why. For about… Read more »

heres an idea
Reply to  Neil Hartland
24, June 2012 5:10 pm

a farmer pulls a car out of a hole. he has to charge £20 because people are always getting stuck in this hole, and he cant afford to do it for nothing.

The driver agrees, and asks the farmer when he has time to plough his fields, at night?

“no, no, night time is when I fill the hole with water”

Concerned of Wootton
Reply to  heres an idea
24, June 2012 6:08 pm

with almost everybody agreeing that not enough was done to a) have a contingency plan in operation on Thursday at the beginning of the festival, b) it was poorly ‘panic managed’ once the seriousness of the situation became apparent and c) looks like getting people off site(s) will be just as problematic… then unfortunately the only recourse is to hit John Giddings where it hurts.. in his… Read more »

Mike
Reply to  heres an idea
24, June 2012 7:24 pm

lol

broadsword
24, June 2012 7:16 pm

I’ve seen loads of people working really hard to help people out at the festival including police, 4×4 volunteers and council workers, which seems like a joined up contingency plan to me. Well done to everyone involved! Also, it didn’t look like numbers were anything like the new licence numbers, seemed more quiet than last year.

Jim B
24, June 2012 7:41 pm

4×4 volunteers hmmm, I saw a picture on the internet of a tractor which had worn a 2 feet trench with its wheels… no 4×4 on earth could negotiate such terrain. Also on pure mud 4×4’s are no better that 2wd. A job for tractors only I think.

oops
24, June 2012 10:22 pm

I saw a video clip* on sky news today featuring, what I think was a poor but funny 4×4 rescue attempt out of a muddy car park. You see, they, “4×4 Response”, tried to tow a Ford estate with a Jeep on rather smooth tyres. And when that didn’t work they hitched a Landrover Discovery in front as well. Which spun only the back right wheel. Which… Read more »

biggmarket
Reply to  oops
24, June 2012 11:16 pm

I note that the official time for reopening Fairlee Road to two way traffic is 1.00PM. From the sound of things that time could be extended.

On the Wightlink web site Ryde Pier will be closed to vehicle traffic from 8.00Am to 8.00PM tomorrow.

Enough Is Enough
24, June 2012 11:39 pm

Do all those words of wisdom comfort and re-assure you? They don’t for me. We can be assured of mayhem. From an organisation point of view, the discussion thread on the festival post-mortem should be interesting once all this flack has died down? It’s very much needed, and cannot be swept under the carpet. Stuart Love say’s the congestion was unacceptable. So let’s talk about it openly… Read more »

No.5
Reply to  Enough Is Enough
25, June 2012 2:12 am

where do people get the idea that Afton was managed properly…it was chaos

Anne
24, June 2012 11:53 pm

Giddings and the IW Council should be held responsible for all of the missed hospital appointments, lost business whether it’s the shops that never benefit from the festival or traders who were stuck in traffic and couldn’t get to their jobs, children stranded at school….. We regularly have traffic paralysis on the island because the Council doesn’t know how to do road infrastructure planning (though they are… Read more »

teacher
Reply to  Anne
25, June 2012 1:43 pm

Anne,
em.. not even 2pm and most have left already, therefore 90,000 could easily be done within 24 hours. I’d go back to the math lesson and check you decimal point. 0/10 see me

Anne
Reply to  teacher
25, June 2012 2:51 pm

2 pm with 44,000 does not mean 90,000 could leave by midnight. You also have to account for triage issue and increased road congestion. Good try, but funny thing is I’ve had calculus and linear algebra…you need to check you maths!

No.5
Reply to  Anne
25, June 2012 4:15 pm

we must stop the mis-information…there were not 90,000 audience members at the festival…figur was closer to 65,000 + riggers, engineers, entourage etc

Anne
Reply to  No.5
25, June 2012 4:46 pm

It wasn’t 90,000, but had planning permission for up to 90,000. The whole issue is what if it WERE 90,000!!

No.5
Reply to  No.5
25, June 2012 5:24 pm

its not me you need to tell…just the doom and gloom merchants that keep going on about ‘90,000’

Jim B
25, June 2012 10:19 am

Also Anne the fact that two properties burnt down in East Cowes on Saturday, albeit empty. If they had been occupied and had caught fire Thursday evening, Giddings, the Council and the Police would all be held responsible probably with dire consequences due to the serious neglect of community safety. Imagine if families perished due to retained and wholetime firefighters were unable to attend due to severe… Read more »

Rea
Reply to  Jim B
25, June 2012 11:58 am

Perhaps they took No.5’s advice and waited until the festival chaos had subsided before they had their house fires…to have the fires two days earlier would have been bloody selfish!

No.5
Reply to  Rea
25, June 2012 4:16 pm

dear god, people are inventing problems to justify failed arguments….

what?
Reply to  No.5
25, June 2012 4:20 pm

they are not inventing anything, 2 houses did burn down and required the fire brigade to attend. All Jim B is doing, as always, is looking at the worst possible case and assuming thats what actually happened. I particularly enjoyed his comment on the cowes harbour story which seems to suggest that yachts can sink when they are stranded by the tide.

No.5
Reply to  what?
25, June 2012 5:22 pm

They would have burnt down anyway…Giddings didn’t start the fire…fire engines attended the seen

Its relevence to the festival was the invention

what?
Reply to  what?
25, June 2012 6:20 pm

its a ‘what if’ comment. no one is inventing anything, simply looking at what could have happened if the traffic disruption and the fire had coincided. Like I say, some of it seems a bit over the top, but its fair, not an invention

what?
Reply to  No.5
25, June 2012 4:21 pm

and into moderation for no apparent reason. VB really needs to get its software sorted

Craighy
Reply to  what?
25, June 2012 4:40 pm

Why don’t you stop your constant bleating? You’re lucky VB let you on here. You act like a troll and can’t seem to let a comment go by without having to answer it. If it were my site, you’d have been blocked long ago.

what?
Reply to  what?
25, June 2012 4:46 pm

the site is free for all to comment on, even for people to have a go at others, which is sad. as a rough guess, I would imagine there are many hundreds of comments I never reply to, so you’re wrong there. good job it isnt your site since you seem to suggest the curtailment of free speech. and finally… a troll is defined as: “In Internet… Read more »

what?
Reply to  No.5
25, June 2012 4:22 pm

ha. straight back out again. what is going on?

PAUL MULLERY
25, June 2012 10:56 am

Do we have No5’s permission to resume normal life now?

No.5
Reply to  PAUL MULLERY
25, June 2012 4:18 pm

Yes Paul you have my permission to resume your campaign against anything and anybody having fun

:)

PS Thats not normal you know…

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined