Paul Carey and Prospero

Replica of Prospero satellite created for 50th anniversary of satellite’s launch

A replica of the Prospero satellite is being made by Nettlestone and Seaview Shed (NaShers) in partnership with the Wight Aviation Museum (WAM) for display in the museum

NaSher, Paul Carey volunteers at WAM and suggested NaShers might fabricate the project while WAM volunteers were busy preparing a new display, celebrating the Island’s contribution to aerospace, ready for the 50th anniversary of the satellite’s launch, 28th October 1971.

Community effort
Both institutions are registered charities so NaShers enthusiastically got their teeth into the project. The full size replica has been designed by Paul from photographs of the original.

Working on Prospero replica

Geoff Howells, Bob Marshall and Rob Webb are providing highly skilled support in the making of the replica. Final touches and display presentation will be undertaken in the museum.

Black Arrow
Prospero was launched by Black Arrow a British satellite carrier rocket built at Cowes and tested at the Needles before launching the Satellite in Woomera, Australia.

Working on Prospero replica

The Wight Aviation Museum has built a full size replica which is displayed at the museum in Sandown.

Purpose of the satellite
The Prospero satellite, also known as the X-3 was designed to undertake a series of experiments to study the effects of space environment on communications satellites and remained operational until 1973, after which it was contacted annually for over 25 years.

It is in a low Earth orbit, and is not expected to decay until about 2070, almost 100 years after its launch.


News shared by Paul on behalf of Nettlestone and Seaview Shed (NaShers). Ed

Images: © Rob Webb

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
0 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
VentnorLad
18, February 2022 6:58 pm

It seems that homeless people are the only group in society against whom openly hostile discrimination is acceptable behaviour. Imagine for just one moment that this HMO was being proposed to help survivors of domestic violence, military veterans who’ve fallen on hard times, refugees from Syria, people with learning disabilities, elderly patients in need of respite care after discharge from hospital, etc., etc. Now imagine the outcry… Read more »

elemental
Reply to  VentnorLad
19, February 2022 10:44 am

In my experience, it is precisely those fleeing domestic abuse, ex military ‘Vets, kids leaving care, ex offenders – many of whom’s trauma from abuse, caused their criminalisation in the first place – late divorced adults, the long term tenant who’s landlord died, literally ANYONE can become homeless. Houses of Multiple Occupation may be ok as an emergency, short term stop gap but they are an otherwise… Read more »

VentnorLad
Reply to  elemental
19, February 2022 11:56 am

“Houses of Multiple Occupation may be ok as an emergency, short term stop gap but they are an otherwise inappropriate measure…” From the article: The HMO would have six beds, be staffed six days a week and be a place for residents to stay while they found somewhere more permanent. I know very well that “literally ANYONE can become homeless”. I also know that given a helping… Read more »

bobmills
Reply to  VentnorLad
19, February 2022 1:52 pm

I do believe Gypsies/Travellers have held onto the discrimination cup for many years screw the residents and businesses everyone needs/deserves a roof over there heads

hialtitude
Reply to  bobmills
19, February 2022 8:22 pm

Yep, exactly what bobmills said.

broc
19, February 2022 12:07 am

Ventnor Lad…. If someone has reason to believe an HMO in that location would be injurious to their business or residential interests they have every right object to the proposal and it would be stupid not to do so, It’s nonsense to suggest that objections are made because of “ugly ill-founded prejudice” there are always reasons for making objections people don’t object without reason

VentnorLad
Reply to  broc
19, February 2022 3:12 am

Thank you for so clearly demonstrating the uncaring, heartless attitudes that cause me to despair. Why would anyone think an HMO for homeless people might be “injurious to their business or residential interests” unless they had prejudged the people living there? People may well have reason to object, but that reason may not be founded in reality. Self-interest and prejudice seems more likely. The current air temperature… Read more »

bobmills
Reply to  broc
19, February 2022 9:49 pm

People don’t object without reason ?
Joke of the weekend cheers I admire your mirth 😊

Angela Hewitt
19, February 2022 8:51 am

Ventnorlad I couldn’t agree more Resident Quote”One neighbour said they had had no communication from Two Saints and felt totally ignored”. I WONDER WHY??. It seems to me that the Queens rd residents are having a negative impact upon the homeless – through no fault of their own. It looks like an ideal spot. Close to bus station, medical centre and shops. Quote “the local area was… Read more »

Colin
19, February 2022 1:31 pm

I expect that many people would read about how the new development at Downside has gone and realise that they don’t want the same to happen on the their own doorstep. Without wishing to put words into his mouth, Mr Brodie would be able to tell you all about it as he was quoted on this site in an article suggesting that he has changed his views… Read more »

VentnorLad
Reply to  Colin
19, February 2022 5:35 pm

“…they don’t want the same to happen on the their own doorstep…” That is pretty much the uncaring, heartless NIMBYism I was commenting upon. It seems that everyone thinks the problem of homelessness is worthy of being addressed until they perceive that it might impact upon their lives. The thought that the homeless are an amorphous blob of alcoholic, drug-addled and violent trouble-makers is as far from… Read more »

Colin
Reply to  VentnorLad
19, February 2022 6:52 pm

It seems through your regular posts that anyone who has a different view to your own is always completely wrong which you sometimes seek to justify by putting words into people’s mouths. It’s not the way to construct an arguement for or against your point. If you constantly think you are right then then you have lost the ability to have a rational discussion. By being able… Read more »

VentnorLad
Reply to  Colin
19, February 2022 7:22 pm

I’m quite certain that if I’d resorted to “gratuitous name calling” our hosts here Sally and Simon would have intervened. They’d be absolutely right to do so. I hold strong opinions and voice them robustly. I make no apology for that fact. My strong opinions on homelessness are based on personal experience. Again, I make no apology for that. If people want to object to hosting a… Read more »

bobmills
Reply to  VentnorLad
19, February 2022 9:48 pm

VL like many others has is opinions etc live with it I do 😂

Colin
19, February 2022 7:48 pm

Yawn…

Mark L Francis
21, February 2022 7:34 am

If this facility should be somewhere more appropriate, where would that be exactly? Are there many derelict ex-hotels available? Probably & the more that find a useful role the better.

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined