Covid home test laid out on a table

Rules on needing a PCR test after positive lateral flow change from Tuesday

From tomorrow (Tuesday), Islanders who do not have symptoms and test positive for Covid-19 using a lateral flow test will no longer need a follow-up PCR to begin their isolation period.

If you get a positive result on a lateral flow test you will still need to self-isolate immediately and report your result on gov.uk. This applies to everyone, vaccinated or not.

Contacted by NHS Test and Trace
After reporting a positive LFT result, you will be contacted by NHS Test and Trace so that your contacts can be traced.

You must continue to self-isolate.

If you have symptoms, self-isolate
People experiencing the three main symptoms of Covid-19 — a high temperature, a new, continuous cough and a loss or change to your sense of smell or taste — will still be expected to isolate immediately and book a PCR test online or by calling 119 as soon as possible. This has not changed.

Those who return a positive PCR result are required to isolate immediately for up to ten days — reduced to seven if they return negative results on day six and seven of their period of isolation.

Bryant: Get vaccinated
Simon Bryant, the council’s director of public health, said,

“The rates of Covid-19 infection across the Island continue to be very high.

“Once again I would stress the importance of being vaccinated and having a booster jab. All of the indications are that this gives you high protection from serious illness from either the Delta or Omicron variant of the virus. So please, if you have still not had a vaccine or booster, make it your new year resolution to do so.

“At the same time, all of the behaviours we know so well — hands, face, space, ventilate — have to continue to be a core part of our daily lives to prevent us catching or transmitting the virus in the first place.”

Love: Islanders must remain vigilant
Cllr Karl Love, Cabinet member for Public Health, added,

“Islanders must remain vigilant. Please get vaccinated if you have not been.

“This helps save lives and protects our key workers who are working incredibly hard in difficult circumstances for you, our Island people.” 

Important information
It’s important to note that if you think you will be eligible for the Test and Trace Support Payment, you will still need a confirmatory positive PCR result to access financial support.

If a parent applies for a payment because they are looking after a child who has tested positive, that child must have a PCR result.

Please check your eligibility on this page on the council’s Website to make sure you don’t miss out.

For more information on COVID-19, visit keeptheislandsafe.org 


News shared by Isle of Wight council press office, in their own words. Ed

Image: Annie Spratt under CC BY 2.0

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
0 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
henry
21, January 2021 4:26 pm

Hahaha, can’t you tell an election is coming ;-)

Colin
21, January 2021 4:36 pm

Much as I would like to see the railways put back to how they were before the Beeching axe in the sixties, I am realistic enough to know that it will never happen. Why? because it is economically unviable for starters. And for seconds, the rail route has been built on in various places. Electioneering again from the tories who couldn’t run a Dotto train let alone… Read more »

peter1
21, January 2021 5:14 pm

Why wouldn’t the steam railway co-operate? Extended rail services right through to Ryde Pierhead.
But I thought the closed track was sold off to make it almost impossible to reinstate. Here’s a thought; extend to Cowes, at least Mill Hill Station!

Tim
Reply to  peter1
21, January 2021 5:55 pm

To avoid tourists getting electrocuted by the third rail and avoid having to upgrade their signaling and rolling stock to national network standards!

wellsm
Reply to  Tim
21, January 2021 11:55 pm

The Class 483 trains can be built to use batteries, the third rail does not have to be a barrier.

Tim
Reply to  wellsm
22, January 2021 8:38 am

Even without the third rail the upgrades required would finish off the steam railway operations.

neilpalmer400
Reply to  wellsm
22, January 2021 11:11 pm

That’s a key point. The section from Smallbrook Jn to Wootton could easily be covered by 483’s with a battery pack (and if really necessary could be run non-stop Smallbrook to Wootton at 25mph due to light rail regulations). Most of the right of way from Wootton to the edge of Newport seems to be mostly clear (a section of new track/route at the end to maybe… Read more »

Tim
21, January 2021 5:53 pm

Bring back the No.39 bus instead!

railwayphil
21, January 2021 7:49 pm

The IOWSR has a Light Railway Order limiting operations to 25mph. Once this speed is exceeded, full National Safety Standards are required plus massive track and signalling investment ro satisfy these Standards. There is no capacity for around 175 days a year with heritage services running between say 10am and 6pm. So a regular main line service would either reduce the steam services to an unviable level… Read more »

wellsm
Reply to  railwayphil
21, January 2021 11:54 pm

Where there is a will there is often a way and one would think that extending back to Newport would relieve a great deal of traffic on the road between there and Ryde. I have been a member of IOWSR for many years and I would look forward to a sharing arrangement if a way can be found. Too often people rush in to say this and… Read more »

wellsm
Reply to  wellsm
21, January 2021 11:58 pm

Also, there is no reason why trains could not continue to run under an LRO if that made the project feasible economically. There is no need for an HST!

Highwayman
21, January 2021 9:01 pm

Being part of the “wealth of knowledge and skill on the Island”, I was phoned by a professional contact employed by a national consultancy that was thinking of bidding to do the feasibility study. After speaking to me, they quickly decided not to. It sounds like a nice idea, but it’s completely unrealistic, for all the reasons already put forward. I can’t understand why IWC should spend… Read more »

wellsm
Reply to  Highwayman
22, January 2021 12:00 am

What a shame that you would go so far as to put a potential contractor off, the benefits of getting traffic off the roads would be substantial.

Highwayman
Reply to  wellsm
23, January 2021 12:32 am

That’s not entirely fair – I certainly don’t dispute the benefits of getting traffic off the roads. If I thought there was any realistic possibility of this study achieving it, I would have agreed to help (which is what my contact had phoned me to ask) and picked up some useful fees from doing so. It would be lovely to see the lines reinsated, but I have… Read more »

Tim
Reply to  Highwayman
22, January 2021 8:40 am

Its the transport board trying to deflect discussions away from taboo subjects!

Snowwolf1
Reply to  Highwayman
22, January 2021 11:37 am

Obviously to justify the hike in Council tax they tend to impose or try to impose this year. All this means is more money being wasted on “Consultations” at a massive price and nothing to show at the end or they will end up supplying something that doesn’t work – like the floating bridge!

planespeaker
22, January 2021 8:14 am

When the combined might of the MP and Council is unable to provide a reliable way of crossing the River Medina between East and West Cowes, how on God’s earth do they think they can restore even the tiniest part of the Islands railway system?

walkingwizard
22, January 2021 9:17 am

The extension of the railway will remove cycle tracks that the council had been trying to get us to use. Use the consultants cash to improve the poor standard of the existing cycle paths.

hialtitude
Reply to  walkingwizard
22, January 2021 11:17 am

Yep, the section of cycle track between Wootton and Island Harbour is only suitable for those with mountain bikes and life jackets.

Generally the cycle paths on the Island suck big time.

Snowwolf1
22, January 2021 11:34 am

Too little too late to a certain extent. The cost alone would be astronomical due to infrastructure such as bridges being removed, tracks built over – they should never have ended the rail network on the Island this in itself would have been our greatest attraction for tourists the film industry, documentaries and keeping skills going even more so it they trains remained steam.

aeroscale
22, January 2021 9:59 pm

Losing access to the permanent way was arguably the most short-sighted decision ever on the Island, making this undoubtedly the biggest and most costly project here in living memory – but it simply needs to be done. Future generations will thank those who provide an alternative to ever-increasing road usage and, even in the short term, there will be a huge boost to local economy in the… Read more »

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined