paul mayhew-archer

‘The Vicar of Dibley’ co-writer’s one-man show ‘Incurable Optimist’ tours to Trinity Theatre

Paul Mayhew-Archer co-writer of The Vicar of Dibley has been making audiences laugh for over 40 years and will continue to this September when he brings his show Incurable Optimist to Trinity Theatre in Cowes.

Paul produced several series of the Radio 4 classic I’m Sorry I Haven’t A Clue and co-wrote, with Richard Curtis, the multi-award-winning and much-loved sitcom The Vicar of Dibley.

Fourteen years ago, Paul was told he had Parkinson’s and he decided to carry on laughing. He started doing jokes about his condition at fundraising events at The Royal Albert Hall and London’s Comedy Store.

Documentary and podcast
Later he made an award-winning BBC documentary Parkinson’s: The Funny Side, and in 2023 he and five friends with Parkinson’s – the BBC presenters Jeremy Paxman, Rory Cellan-Jones, Mark Mardell and Gillian Lacey-Solymar, and the Judge Nick Mostyn – got together to make a podcast called Movers and Shakers.

It has become more popular and influential than any of them thought possible and won the Broadcasting Press Guild’s Podcast of The Year Award.

A show full of funny stories
Paul travels around the country performing his one-man show Incurable Optimist. It’s a show full of funny stories about his career and his condition and he does it to raise awareness of Parkinson’s, to raise money for local Parkies and because he absolutely loves hearing people laugh.

Josh Widdicombe says,

“Paul isn’t just one of the country’s funniest writer he’s also a brilliant performer.”


Rory Bremner says,

“So funny… and true in the way only comedy can express.”

You can see Paul Mayhew-Archer perform Incurable Optimist from 7.30pm on Thursday 5th September. Doors open 6.45pm events ends approximately 9.40pm.

Book your tickets now via Ticket Source.


News shared by Chris on behalf of Trinity Theatre.

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
0 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Margie
14, November 2014 4:45 pm

This is great news for the residents. Well done everyone for your persistence.

Hamster
14, November 2014 4:48 pm

Very interesting report. I thought the reference to the strong odour in the first report seemed odd. Especially as one of the residents said there was no-one else there except them during the rebuild.

tryme
Reply to  Hamster
14, November 2014 5:58 pm

See no.5 on p.2, Hamster, saying they are to send materials for contamination risk tests, “specific concerns … with which we would generally agree”;

and

Recommendation no.8 on p.5 “unauthorised tippings of untested materials in an SSSI area”.

Mr T
14, November 2014 4:50 pm

Good work PW, let’s just hope your report leads to the councillors letting this road be reopened to the residents.

Live cut off by car is not pleasant for these folks.

Craig
14, November 2014 4:51 pm

Yesssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss!

Stephen
14, November 2014 5:07 pm

It would be interesting to compare and contrast the brief or instruction given to each consultancy.
I suspect the brief to PW was broader in its scope thus allowing a more measured but fully risk identified conclusion to be reached.
Could it be that Messrs Ramboll might have concluded much the same as PW with a differently worded brief?

tryme
14, November 2014 5:31 pm

Cllr Jordan’s response sounds sensible.
The restrictions PW stipulate, eg. on vehicle weight and size, and no vehicular access by the general public, vindicates the councillors’ previous caution. Well done them for requiring a second opinion.

Residentify 2
14, November 2014 5:54 pm

Now we see different conclusions from an independent engineers report on the residents repair. Making the observation that the island roads contractors had left materials which was of some concern loading the lower parts of the slip maybe it’s time for him to look at the failure reports of the civil engineering by island roads contractors bet he has a different view of the planning, design,standard of… Read more »

Lee Morris
Reply to  Residentify 2
14, November 2014 6:06 pm

What would be equally interesting to see is what Pritchard Wilmot may have made of the “construction” work at Woodlands.

Residentify 2
Reply to  Lee Morris
14, November 2014 7:20 pm

I think he would see the concret was weakened by plasticisers, that the steel bars are too close to the surface of the ground beam. That the beam has no footing or piling.That the beam has fractured under its own weight without even a road load been applied.That the ground beam was actually build over a water coarse (some people call that a bridge!) That the ground… Read more »

Philip Hawkins
Reply to  Residentify 2
15, November 2014 10:34 am

The failure of the western end of the reinforcing beam was assisted by the fill dumped between it and the remaining road carriageway, in an apparent attempt to stop the un-supported edge of that collapsing. Too many laden trucks bouncing along next to something like a 10′ vertical drop? The fact that the ground there was unable to retain the ground anchors should have been known, and… Read more »

Highwayman
14, November 2014 11:01 pm

One of the advantages of the traditional highways maintenance regime (i.e. local authorities employing their own engineers) used to be that directly employed staff having detailed knowledge of their local area could work to lower factors of safety than outside consultants: Knowing they would themselves be responsible for dealing with any failures, officers could weigh up the likely costs of ongoing repairs against the possibly much greater… Read more »