Undercliff Drive

Undercliff Drive: Work to reinstate access hampered by series of delays (photos)

Since the middle of September, work has been taking place to reinstate vehicle access to the landlocked properties in Undercliff Drive – following the landslide in February 2014.

The work by Island Roads, originally scheduled to be completed in eight weeks, is now in its tenth week, with the original planning application being added to as the work is carried out (ten additional documents added to the planning application since it was approved in August).

Residents: “To me it’s being handled like a DIY job”
The owner of one property in the landlocked area has been providing OnTheWight with regular updates on the work taking place and frankly, it’s been eye opening.

If there had been just one or two mishaps, there’d be nothing to report. But this is different. We’re hearing week after week of work being carried out by contractors that has to be redone.

The property owner says he thinks the project, “is being handled like a DIY job”.

Alleged problems
Here’s a very brief list of some of the problems residents allege have happened. We’re putting these to Island Roads:

  • Path posts placed and removed more than four times
  • 20m of posts put on top of water main
  • Water main had a post driven through it
  • The eastern chicane too narrow and redone twice
  • Posts too short (western end) so extra glued on top with filler around them
  • Kerb stones, etc buried in SSSI area at the rear of Woodington
  • New road built on mud
  • Fence post by Woodlands – placed in plastic tube attached to wire cage of gabion so when soil compacted, the wires move and so the fence posts move too – gabions removed and replaced
  • 60 tonnes of dry earth dumped at eastern end above the concrete bar
  • When earth delivered it was put on the new road and damaged the road
  • IR hadn’t engaged utility services early enough – water/electricity – workman tarmacked over road before cables buried
  • At the eastern end the drain is higher than rest of road so water can’t drain off

The work so far
OnTheWight popped down to see the progress of the works at the beginning of the month and were initially impressed with how it was looking.

Revisiting last Friday, it was disappointing to see the project has taken another step backwards.

These series of photos below show work completed by 7 November 2016, 19 November 2016 and one going back to Feb 2014.

The Eastern end and turning head
Click on images to see larger versions, description and date taken

Undercliff Drive - the Eastern End (7th November 2016)

Undercliff Drive - the Eastern turning head (7th November 2016)

Footpath chicane and bollard installed and then moved
Click on images to see larger versions, description and date taken

Undercliff Drive - the Eastern End footpath (7th November 2016)

Undercliff Drive - a week later the chicane has moved (19th November 2016)

Undercliff Drive - Chicane moved and extended (19th November 2016)

The concrete bar was installed during works Oct 2013
Click on images to see larger versions, description and date taken

Undercliff Drive - the Eastern End (7th November 2016)

Undercliff Drive - the Eastern End (7th November 2016)

Undercliff Drive - the concrete bar has moved down the slope because it is not attached to anything (7th November 2016)

Undercliff Drive - see how the concrete bar has broken (7th November 2016)

This is the concrete bar in Feb 2014 - note how much higher the other end is

Fence posts installed into moving gabions
Click on images to see larger versions, description and date taken

Undercliff Drive - the posts in the gabions are already leaning (7th November 2016)

Undercliff Drive - the posts in the gabions are already leaning (7th November 2016)

Undercliff Drive - a week later footpath being rebuilt due to moving fence posts (19th November 2016)

Undercliff Drive - Gabions removed as fence posts installed into them moving (19th November 2016)

Undercliff Drive - open site (19th November 2016)

A sad reminder
Click on images to see larger versions, description and date taken

Undercliff Drive - a sad reminder for residents of what was supposed to be (7th November 2016)

The Western end of the landlocked area – where road was built, then moved, then extended, white lines painted on, then removed, painted on again
Click on images to see larger versions, description and date taken

Undercliff Drive - the Western end (7th November 2016)

Undercliff drive - Western end after rain (19th November 2016)

Undercliff Drive - the Western end (7th November 2016)

Undercliff Drive - the Western end (7th November 2016)

Undercliff Drive - Western end extended again (19th November 2016)

Undercliff Drive - One of the extended sections (19th November 2016)

Undercliff Drive - the Western end (7th November 2016)

Undercliff Drive - the Western end turning head (7th November 2016)

Seeking response from Island Roads
It seems to be one thing after another for the residents of Undercliff Drive (and that includes the ones on the outside of the landlocked area too).

OnTheWight has written to Island Roads about the situation, but experience has taught not to wait for an answer before publishing.

The last media query we placed with them about Undercliff Drive took four weeks to get a response. Sadly the response they gave didn’t answer the question we’d posed.

Hopefully this time the response will be far quicker. It’s the very least the residents deserve.

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
23 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
CB500
22, November 2016 2:15 pm

A chimp with a bucket and spade would have done better. Big round of applause to Phil Jordan for giving the job to the very same people who ( allegedly ) messed the job up first time round.

tyke
22, November 2016 2:39 pm

What a palaver. Another question that no-one, including the media, seems to be bothered with is the contaminated rubble dumped down there by those responsible for the unauthorised temporary road. Here we have spoil, laced with asbestos and other pollutants, that apparently came from a reputable local business. I would like to know who supplied this material, where else it has gone and why no action has… Read more »

tr
Reply to  tyke
22, November 2016 2:48 pm

you couldn’t make it up. they’d never believe you. FIASCO.
Other countries, Japan and New Zealand to name but two, seem to know how to deal with landslips, and get on with it.
why don’t we just go and ask someone who knows what they’re doing, to come and tell us, or show us, how to do this properly??????

Steve Goodman
Reply to  tr
22, November 2016 3:21 pm

Which again reminds us of Eddie Giles and his gang, and (no apologies for the relevant repetition) ..the bs sales pitch from the previous council determined to sign us up to a pricey PFI switch before they could be voted out. We were assured repeatedly by the likes of Eddie, Jay, Stuart, & their gang on behalf of the local & national politicians keen to move more… Read more »

mywifesheelsare2high
Reply to  Steve Goodman
22, November 2016 6:48 pm

Well said Steve Goodman at least the Indies are trying to sort out the problem of the Undercliff the Tories under PUGH did nothing except buy up property very expensive then flog off very cheap eight years of nothing.

Island Monkey
Reply to  mywifesheelsare2high
22, November 2016 6:58 pm

The Tories? Some mistake surely. This fiasco started with the Lib Dem council of yesteryear, well before Pugh & Co.

Some of those responsible for the millions wasted and the illegal contracts have now reinvented themselves as Indie’s in this current administration. We all know the names.

Philip Hawkins
22, November 2016 4:10 pm

I’m glad somebody is documenting this, this time (although you’ve missed the fact that the new stretch of road at the western end had white lines painted all the way along both edges – you can see where they have been erased in pictures 18-21). From the legends painted on the road it would appear that much of this end is awaiting re-surfacing. The original fiasco was… Read more »

CHRIS P LAMB
22, November 2016 4:55 pm

Residents: “To me it’s being handled like a DIY job”

What did he expect – efficiency? How very Isle of Wight Council at its best. Farcical, risible and totally incompetent. It’s a good job Wight councillors aren’t responsible for the Brexit negotiations! Imagine that.

Island Monkey
22, November 2016 5:56 pm

Another IOW council omnishambles. Where”s Phil when you need him, popping up to blame the Tories. The council MagSafe Island Roads, they are supposed to be in charge.

phil jordan
Reply to  Island Monkey
22, November 2016 7:28 pm

IM: ah….you mean the service contract provider that the conservatives selected after about £8m of pre-contract costs and 7 years of work… the one that this administration inherited in May 2013 after about 8 weeks of the contract starting? And having done that, delivered to us a contract agreement that has been in dispute since day one, continues to be in dispute and has cost countless hours… Read more »

Drone
Reply to  phil jordan
22, November 2016 7:45 pm

Hear hear Phil, this mess is not down to the Indies and probably not even down the Island council.

Robert Jones
Reply to  Drone
22, November 2016 9:49 pm

It plainly IS down to the Isle of Wight Council: just not to those presently running it. I don’t know what the present administration can do to save this situation, if it can be saved, but whatever the details of these “illegal contracts” referred to above by Island Monkey may have been (and we’ve never been told, nor was anyone ever brought to book) the fact remains… Read more »

tyke
22, November 2016 9:49 pm

Phil – why aren’t you (or anyone) concerned that contaminated spoil has been dumped at this site and lord knows where else on the Island?
Is it because you cannot lay the blame for this recklessness at anyone’s door but your own administration’s?
I simply cannot understand why this dangerous act of environmental vandalism doesn’t seem to bother you.

phil jordan
Reply to  tyke
23, November 2016 7:13 am

tyke:

The contaminated material is part of the overall works and is to be removed as part of that scheme.

The responsibility for dealing with the person(s) who put it there in the first place falls to the Environment Agency (who conducted there own enquiry)

You are not suggesting, are you, that the Council placed it there …?

buckle
22, November 2016 10:33 pm

Despite both the very visible flaws and the concealed underlying timebomb of building on a mudslide without even a nod to drainage or geotechnical stabilisation works, the access road and path will be opened with great haste and triumphalism…..shortly before being closed again due to safety reasons. Even though the recent works fall outside the scope of the PFI,and therefore require additional spend, the present administration chose… Read more »

phil jordan
Reply to  buckle
23, November 2016 7:21 am

buckle: It is not the case that “additional spend” will be required for these works. An agreement has been reached that sees the remaining funds set aside for the Undercliff Drive works (and included in the original contract) to be used for the purpose of this scheme. I absolutely share your concerns about the service delivery and delays here and they are being addressed directly with the… Read more »

buckle
Reply to  phil jordan
23, November 2016 10:32 am

Phil, I think you misunderstood. The additional £500,000 funding for the access road and path, following the failure of the 2013 IR geotechnical scheme, was not part of the PFI contract. Therefore, the point I am making is that as a separately funded project, the constraints of using IR did not apply. Financial penalties for delays will only encourage the contractor to cut corners and get the… Read more »

Island Monkey
22, November 2016 10:59 pm

As with everything else, It’s all the Tories fault – even thou they had nothing to do with this Undercliff contract. Phil you know this one is down to your lot, why not just admit it? You can always tell people you’re working closely with them to fix the daily failures, as recorded above. I ask fair minded people to consider one simple question. If as Phil… Read more »

Steve Goodman
22, November 2016 11:33 pm

Or: As well documented here OTW and elsewhere, much of what ails us is indeed ‘the Tories fault’ (including their choice of bs PFI puff about the Undercliff; see above) – which explains why they were voted out. Why not just admit it? I ask fair minded people to consider one simple question. If as ‘the Tories’ claim, everything that is wrong with the Island council is… Read more »

Island Monkey
23, November 2016 8:03 am

As I am sure you know, no-one in the last Tory Executive is likely to be standing again. Most have left the Island or politics. In May fresh new faces will become the new conservative administration with a proper mandate from the electorate.

bones
23, November 2016 11:05 am

In fighting is pointless. The blame gets tossed around the Council like a hot brick. At this point it doesn’t really matter who signed the contract. It seems to me that Island Roads are only the monkeys…….and they seem unfit for purpose. Who is the organ grinder ? Where are the Engineers who thought up the scheme ? Are they insured against the failure of schemes like… Read more »

Robert Jones
23, November 2016 11:33 am

People living locally, of whom I’m one, don’t give a damn who was responsible for all this any more – they’re concerned about the future of the road, if it has one, and stabilization of the cliff, which must include proper drainage, if it has to be just a walkway in future. Under the Liberal administration, we were told we had the foremost experts in Europe working… Read more »

buckle
Reply to  Robert Jones
23, November 2016 12:44 pm

Very well said Mr Jones.

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined