Angie and Oscar the terrier

Unlikely heroes: How an 86-year-old and her senior dog redefine companionship

This National Pet Month, octogenarian Angie Langslow and her ageing companion Oscar are living proof that there’s always the perfect partner out there – no matter what your time of life.

Shortly after the death of her husband Brian, Angie was teamed up with Oscar, a Maltese/Yorkshire Terrier-cross by the Island’s RSPCA. Oscar too, was also in need of a new lease of life having lost his home so it was – and is – the perfect match.

Angie and Oscar have formed quite the partnership
Angie, 86, and Oscar, who is in his Autumn years, have formed quite the partnership.

Angie, loves the daily duties of caring for a companion once more and Oscar busies himself making sure he keeps Angie company and investigating any comings and goings to the pair’s Freshwater home.

Angie, who still practices therapy to a small group of clients from her home, said,

“He is just so loving, he sleeps beside me in his bed each night and will follow me around the house and rest next to wherever I am. I have previously had three dogs and it is just lovely to have another back in the house once more, particularly having lost Brian. 

“Coming to me so late in Oscar’s own life must have been strange for him but he settled so quickly. He absolutely adores the people who come to visit my house for their therapy and they absolutely adore him.

“He was said to be deaf when he came to me, but I give him a little therapy and it does seem that he can now hear certain things. He rushes outside to investigate when he can hear the neighbours and he always knows when I arrive back at the house after being out for a shopping trip.”

Angie and Oscar the terrier

Pugh: There really is a rescue pet out there for everyone
Suzanne Pugh, manager of the Island’s RSPCA branch said it was obvious from the start that Angie and Oscar were made for one another. RSPCA staff are always on hand if necessary and they welcome Oscar back to their Godshill HQ every now and then to give him a check-up, a nail clip and a haircut.

“Angie and Oscar really demonstrate how, if arrangements are carefully managed, there really is a rescue pet out there for everyone.

“Though both are seniors they are made for one another. The fact that we paired two wonderful seniors together makes us all feel proud and the fact that they clearly give each other such companionship is just lovely.”

Relies on public donations
The Island’s RSPCA receives no funding from the national organisation and so relies on public donations to deliver its services. If you want to donate or discover more adopting and animal companion please visit the Website.

National Pet Month which runs throughout April celebrates and raises awareness of responsible pet ownership. Coordinated by the National Office of Animal Health (NOAH) and UK Pet Food, the educational campaign aims to bring together animal welfare charities, professional bodies, pet businesses, schools, youth groups, and pet lovers.

You can support the Island’s RSPCA by visiting the Donate page.


News shared by Gavin on behalf of RSPCA Isle of Wight. Ed

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
2 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
JamesP
14, January 2013 11:18 am

If 60% of the samples were unusable, at least that many need to be re-taken, surely, if only to fulfil the original brief? And if none of the samples (good or bad) was tested for asbestos, then the results are incomplete and inconclusive. As with children’s homework, it all needs to be done again, and properly this time!

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence…

James Luke
16, January 2013 11:39 am

The whole system seems to rely on trust with no independent oversight. A major multi-national that will make many millions of pounds in profit should this planning application go ahead. They are paying Consultants to prove that the development should go ahead. I believe this type of analysis should be conducted independently. To make matters worse, it is unclear what the punishment is if the planning application… Read more »

JILL RUSSELL
18, January 2013 1:10 pm

Historical research shows that the perimeter of the site where most of these boreholes will be taken follows the line of enclosure of the former oyster beds and before them the salterns. So whatever soil samples they get from these areas, they won’t provide any worthwhile information about the levels of contamination from the waste which was deposited from at least 1912 onwards (County Press records).

James Luke
6, April 2013 1:58 pm

ASBESTOS CONTAMINATION HAS NOW BEEN CONFIRMED AT THE ASPHALT PLANT SITE. After months or argument and objections concerning the risk of asbestos contamination at the site, the IWC Planning Department has just published the latest soil report. It states, “Asbestos containing materials were encountered within the near surface waste and capping material.” This is after months of denial by the Applicant and accusations of scaremongering by Councillors.… Read more »

wightywight
Reply to  James Luke
6, April 2013 5:14 pm

James Luke: What are the prospects now of the applicant offering to *clean up* the site by removing the ‘top soil’ – not sure how deep the “near surface waste and capping material”..is? Any ideas on that? Is it feasible to clean up a site such as this by digging the contamination out and taking away (to contaminate another site somewhere!!)the soil..? What might be likely costs… Read more »

James Luke
Reply to  wightywight
6, April 2013 10:22 pm

The soil contaminated with Asbestos was going to be excavated and used in the bunds. There are recommendations in the consultants report that any contaminated soil must be capped, all workers should be wearing protective gear, etc. I suspect that if you pay enough it’s possible to clean up most types of contamination. However, this is just one reason to object to this plant. In addition, there… Read more »

tryme
Reply to  James Luke
6, April 2013 10:35 pm

I’m wondering whether cleaning up asbestos outdoors may have implications for more than the protected workers doing the job – fibres floating off in the air, perhaps. Whereas indoors it’s a contained environment.

James Luke
Reply to  tryme
6, April 2013 10:52 pm

Excavating soil contaminated with asbestos immediately adjacent to a public footpath used by runners, cyclists and walkers must be a risk to the public.

tryme
Reply to  James Luke
6, April 2013 5:47 pm

Congratulations James Luke, on getting this far through sheer determination.

James Luke
Reply to  tryme
6, April 2013 5:57 pm

I can’t take any credit for this – the credit goes to Harvey and others who have tirelessly pursued this issue.

Personally, I feel that the Council Officers should have been doing this work!!

My thanks go out to my friends and colleagues in WRAP who have done the real work!

Bystander
Reply to  James Luke
6, April 2013 6:31 pm

@James Luke The treacherous Councillors should hopefully just have time for their swan-song of now accusing the Planning Department of scaremongering before they are unceremoniously dumped in the forthcoming elections.

retiredhack
Reply to  James Luke
6, April 2013 6:33 pm

@James Luke: James (or anyone), can you point me in the direction of (documented) claims by councillors of scaremongering? (I don’t doubt you for a moment that it’s occurred, it’s just that now would be a good time to remind them of what they said.)

James Luke
Reply to  retiredhack
6, April 2013 8:00 pm

Here’s an IWRadio article on the subject =>
http://www.iwradio.co.uk/articles/2012-10-01-anti-asphalt-plant-campaigners-scaremongering

Here’s the OnTheWight article on the subject =>
http://onthewight.com/2012/10/23/david-pughs-anti-asphalt-plant-scaremongering-claim-challenged/

Councillor Pugh highlights a photo image posted on the WRAP web site as an example of scaremongering but then generalises his comment referring to “aspects like that”.

Black Dog
6, April 2013 4:05 pm

James Luke, I take my hat off to you and others for pursuing this matter. The Applicant, The HSE, The Planning Department, Councillors Pugh and Brown – Not fit for purpose This entire application stinks of corruption and must be halted. In fact if the Applicant took the honorable way out and abandoned the PFI contract it would do the Island a big favour. Let us face… Read more »

tryme
6, April 2013 11:17 pm

Re-reading the details at the top of the topic again, about borehole readings, it is breathtaking the applicant thought they could get away with what they supplied. Dozey old Isle of Wight, they’ll never notice… They weren’t reckoning on James Luke et al!

James Luke
Reply to  tryme
6, April 2013 11:30 pm

Harvey and others are the ones to congratulate! Surprisingly, I believe that WRAP’s assessment was that the latest boreholes were still not adequate for a proper assessment. We did not believe that either the number of the position of the boreholes was sufficient to properly evaluate the site …. yet they still turned up contamination. Similar objections are being raised on the air quality assessment. WRAP are… Read more »

tryme
Reply to  James Luke
7, April 2013 12:13 am

Yes, it’s extraordinary that WRAP have had to become experts on this because IWC aren’t doing the job themselves. I can only speculate to myself why this would be so…

Black Dog
Reply to  tryme
7, April 2013 9:47 am

If regime change is is delivered on May 2nd this entire mess will be dealt with swiftly.

By voting in candidates who actually care and represent their wards before party politics, we can take back control from these despots, over inflated directors and officers.

Make your votes count by voting anything other than Conservative

downwind resident
Reply to  James Luke
7, April 2013 1:02 pm

Would that be the same Council Officer who instructed the Regulatory Committee, to ignore the fact that the proposed asphalt plant will be emitting hazardous particulate contamination, at the hearing for the Environmental Permitby Eurovia recently?
Has the statutory ambient air quality survey of the Medina Valley been undertaken yet and if so by whom?
Certainly not the Council officers!

Black Dog
Reply to  downwind resident
7, April 2013 1:31 pm

There are very many unanswered questions regarding this and other contracts this regime has signed the Island up for. If the Independents can prove (with the help of ordinary council workers) wrong-doings, I am absolutely certain that they will pursue any and all legal remedies available to them – No one should be excluded Councillors, Directors (past and present) managers and the companies themselves. So if it… Read more »