Havenstreet Evacuees:

World War II evacuees head to Havenstreet Steam Railway

Thanks to Suzanne for this latest report. Ed


Based at Havenstreet’s Isle of Wight Steam Railway this event allows children to discover what it was like to be evacuated during the Second World War.

Havenstreet Station was transformed to replicate a wartime station and children undertook activities relevant to their evacuation.

Organised by Heritage Service
Organised by Isle of Wight Council’s heritage service, the event recreated the scenario that tens of thousands of school children went through over 70 years ago.

Pupils and staff from the schools dressed in wartime clothes and arrived at the IW Steam Railway with gas masks ahead of a ride on the train, mirroring the experience from the war years. Once on board the train they were waved off from the platform, giving them a real feeling of how it was for children to be evacuated all those years ago.

War time food
Pupils tasted authentic wartime food, such as eggless cake and paste sandwiches and learned about rationing and make-do-and-mend toys.

As happened during the war their school lessons were interrupted by an air raid siren and the pupils then marched into the air raid shelter.

Of course the organisation of moving children from one town to another was well planned during the war years. Teams in towns and villages were made up of members of the WVS as well as local Council officials.

Vice chairman of the council on board
During the event Cllr Charles Chapman visited and really entered into the spirit of the event, dressed in pin-striped suit, as the local councillor responsible for placing children with their ‘new’ families.

This event was featured as a BBC TV South news item on Thursday morning.

Image: © Suzanne Whitewood

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
6 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bystander
17, June 2013 6:28 pm

No reason in the world why not, and the sooner the better.

I also feel that a school register like roll call should be introduced. Where each councilors name is read out in alphabetical order and they should each reply “Present”, or, if necessary, we should be given a valid reason for their absence.

mat
Reply to  Bystander
18, June 2013 1:02 pm

Remember most Council work is voluntary, particularly at Parish levels. Councillors’ allowances on the Island are among the lowest for comparable authorities in the south. The Isle of Wight Council members are paid a basic allowance of £7,903 a year. The figure at Southampton City Council is £11,159.16 and £12,003 at Hampshire County Council.Birmingham pays over £16,000. Most councillors do not claim any expenses at all. Is… Read more »

Bystander
Reply to  mat
18, June 2013 1:28 pm

But this article is regarding members of the full Council, who are paid allowances. We expect them to do their job to the best of their ability – no less. They knew what the allowance was when the stood for election so I really don’t see your point when you say we are getting what we pay for. Also as all meetings of the full Council are… Read more »

adrian nicholas
17, June 2013 7:03 pm

Very good call – about time this happened, hopefully will consequently attract more interest from Islanders noting the local election vote turnout numbers were disappointing given what was at stake, and for decisions that affect all Islanders, and timely coming on wider national topical issue of public transparency in democratic representation.

Be nice to see unanimity on this issue by elected members.

tryme
17, June 2013 7:43 pm

I think I would get stagefright as a councillor being filmed! I’m obviously not cut out for it myself. Well done OTW for having pushed the boundaries for years and prepared the ground well in advance of this opportunity. It’s quite funny that so many of us here will be excited to listen into a council meeting – of all things, (& quite rightly…)

Steve Goodman
Reply to  tryme
19, June 2013 11:25 am

Stagefright ought not to be too much of a problem for councillors as public speaking is such a large part of the work involved, and making these meetings available to a wider audience can only improve things for interested taxpayers & voters (particularly as the public gallery has such a restricted view). A good example I am aware of started several years ago in Stroud (Glos.), where… Read more »

tryme
Reply to  Steve Goodman
19, June 2013 4:36 pm

I don’t know, the small amount of council meetings I attended during the previous administration were very dull, alleviated only by noticing under-the-breath comments and non-verbal communication. Everyone seemed under-the-thumb of Pugh & George Thingy.

I’m looking forward to free expression of individuality with the new lot.

Man in Black
17, June 2013 8:26 pm

Fantastic news, well done for your persistence in opening up the council.

Don Smith
18, June 2013 12:15 am

Great news – Now they can let us know who sends their apologies for not being in attendance.

But please give the prayers a miss!

Steve Goodman
Reply to  Don Smith
18, June 2013 5:05 pm

Should we pray for an end to these prayers?

Good to see movement towards the broadcast of meetings, which should not cost much, even if the need for wider public scrutiny has reduced recently.

Cynic
Reply to  Don Smith
18, June 2013 5:38 pm

As a matter of interest- how many people here actually watch Parliament on TV?

Stewart Blackmore
18, June 2013 7:02 pm

Some of the comments above seem to have gone off-point and Full Council attendance is not compulsory. I don’t see the point with regard to who watches Parliament TV. In this democracy it is available for those who want to watch it and it is, I believe, a very good service. It would be good if the monitor in the public gallery at County Hall worked as… Read more »

Bystander
Reply to  Stewart Blackmore
18, June 2013 7:40 pm

Perhaps attendance isn’t technically compulsory, although it should be, but councilors should attend and attendance records are poor. They should be present as they are elected representatives and these are meetings of the full Council they serve on. That is entirely relevant as with broadcasts will make the electorate more aware of whether they bother to attend or take a sicky.

Cynic
Reply to  Stewart Blackmore
18, June 2013 7:43 pm

The point, SB, is that I agree that Parliamentary TV is a “good” thing in a democracy- as will be the broadcasting of IWC meetings. But there is a risk that politicians will play to the gallery e.g. that knockabout session full of soundbites called “Prime Minister’s Question Time” adds little to public knowledge other than MPs on both sides acting like football hooligans and their leaders… Read more »

Bystander
Reply to  Cynic
18, June 2013 7:55 pm

But PMQ’s was a disgrace prior to being televised as it was covered in detail by the press. But I for one would love to see drama queens on the Council over acting.

steve s
Reply to  Cynic
18, June 2013 9:41 pm

Yes, Cicero, we’re looking to include cabinet meetings (and others) in this initiative.

john luckett
18, June 2013 9:05 pm

Another positive step. I hope and pray that it brings “those that are governed” closer to “those who govern” – as Martin Bell says. It cannot do any harm. Personally, I would be very disappointed if prayers were stopped at start of Full Council Meeting. Those who do not believe should decline to take part – that is cool, after all how long do prayers take –… Read more »

tryme
Reply to  john luckett
18, June 2013 9:19 pm

Those who DO believe “should” find somewhere else to express themselves, John, and not expect to impose their religious beliefs on those attending a secular meeting. Or expect them to be put to the trouble such that they have to mark themselves out and “decline to take part”.

Bystander
Reply to  tryme
18, June 2013 10:10 pm

Agreed, churches are an appropriate place to pray Council meetings aren’t.