Cabinet Meeting Tonight: Live Coverage on VentnorBlog

Cabinet Meeting Tonight: Live Coverage on VentnorBlogAs you may be aware, when we can, we carry live coverage of debates at the Isle of Wight Council. It’s a considerable effort, but we feel that it’s important that as many people as possible have access to decisions that will affect the Island for years to come. From what we’ve heard from VB readers, they appreciate it too.

To that end, we’ll be getting on the frantic typing and posting pony again tonight to cover the Cabinet meeting at County Hall.

Amongst the items being debated (others listed below), will be the Report from the Cabinet Member for Children and Young People, for the “Change of Age Characteristic – Christ the King College Voluntary Aided Church of England/Roman Catholic” – translation: altering the schools years covered by Christ the King from 9 to 14, to become 11 to 19.

This is a subject that has raised considerable debate on VentnorBlog, both on the subject of Christ the King College changing the age groups of pupils to 11 to 19, but also on issues such as Christ the King College becoming the only school on the Island allowed to have Maths and Computing as its specialism.

Read the paper on the proposed changes to Christ The King College.

Other items being discussed
Report of the Cabinet Member for Residents, Resources and the Fire Service
Medium-Term Revenue and Capital Budget Strategy 2009/10 – 2011/12 and Council Tax 2009/10.

Report of the Cabinet Member for Health, Housing, and Community Wellbeing
Review of the Council’s Approach to the Provision of Homelessness Prevention Services.

Consideration of The Forward Plan
Cabinet Members to identify decisions which need to be amended, added, or removed from the Forward Plan.

Help Us To Keep This Service Going
Cabinet member Alan Wells congratulated VentnorBlog on the live coverage at the Cabinet Meeting held on 24 November last year.

He had to leave the meeting (as he had declared an interest) and was able to keep up with the progress of discussions by following our live coverage on VentnorBlog.

If you’d like to show your appreciation for our efforts, don’t forget that you can contribute to the cause by subscribing to VentnorBlog for as little as 50p per week.

Image: Fabliaux

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
4 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bystander
17, June 2013 6:28 pm

No reason in the world why not, and the sooner the better.

I also feel that a school register like roll call should be introduced. Where each councilors name is read out in alphabetical order and they should each reply “Present”, or, if necessary, we should be given a valid reason for their absence.

mat
Reply to  Bystander
18, June 2013 1:02 pm

Remember most Council work is voluntary, particularly at Parish levels. Councillors’ allowances on the Island are among the lowest for comparable authorities in the south. The Isle of Wight Council members are paid a basic allowance of £7,903 a year. The figure at Southampton City Council is £11,159.16 and £12,003 at Hampshire County Council.Birmingham pays over £16,000. Most councillors do not claim any expenses at all. Is… Read more »

Bystander
Reply to  mat
18, June 2013 1:28 pm

But this article is regarding members of the full Council, who are paid allowances. We expect them to do their job to the best of their ability – no less. They knew what the allowance was when the stood for election so I really don’t see your point when you say we are getting what we pay for. Also as all meetings of the full Council are… Read more »

adrian nicholas
17, June 2013 7:03 pm

Very good call – about time this happened, hopefully will consequently attract more interest from Islanders noting the local election vote turnout numbers were disappointing given what was at stake, and for decisions that affect all Islanders, and timely coming on wider national topical issue of public transparency in democratic representation.

Be nice to see unanimity on this issue by elected members.

tryme
17, June 2013 7:43 pm

I think I would get stagefright as a councillor being filmed! I’m obviously not cut out for it myself. Well done OTW for having pushed the boundaries for years and prepared the ground well in advance of this opportunity. It’s quite funny that so many of us here will be excited to listen into a council meeting – of all things, (& quite rightly…)

Steve Goodman
Reply to  tryme
19, June 2013 11:25 am

Stagefright ought not to be too much of a problem for councillors as public speaking is such a large part of the work involved, and making these meetings available to a wider audience can only improve things for interested taxpayers & voters (particularly as the public gallery has such a restricted view). A good example I am aware of started several years ago in Stroud (Glos.), where… Read more »

tryme
Reply to  Steve Goodman
19, June 2013 4:36 pm

I don’t know, the small amount of council meetings I attended during the previous administration were very dull, alleviated only by noticing under-the-breath comments and non-verbal communication. Everyone seemed under-the-thumb of Pugh & George Thingy.

I’m looking forward to free expression of individuality with the new lot.

Man in Black
17, June 2013 8:26 pm

Fantastic news, well done for your persistence in opening up the council.

Don Smith
18, June 2013 12:15 am

Great news – Now they can let us know who sends their apologies for not being in attendance.

But please give the prayers a miss!

Steve Goodman
Reply to  Don Smith
18, June 2013 5:05 pm

Should we pray for an end to these prayers?

Good to see movement towards the broadcast of meetings, which should not cost much, even if the need for wider public scrutiny has reduced recently.

Cynic
Reply to  Don Smith
18, June 2013 5:38 pm

As a matter of interest- how many people here actually watch Parliament on TV?

Stewart Blackmore
18, June 2013 7:02 pm

Some of the comments above seem to have gone off-point and Full Council attendance is not compulsory. I don’t see the point with regard to who watches Parliament TV. In this democracy it is available for those who want to watch it and it is, I believe, a very good service. It would be good if the monitor in the public gallery at County Hall worked as… Read more »

Bystander
Reply to  Stewart Blackmore
18, June 2013 7:40 pm

Perhaps attendance isn’t technically compulsory, although it should be, but councilors should attend and attendance records are poor. They should be present as they are elected representatives and these are meetings of the full Council they serve on. That is entirely relevant as with broadcasts will make the electorate more aware of whether they bother to attend or take a sicky.

Cynic
Reply to  Stewart Blackmore
18, June 2013 7:43 pm

The point, SB, is that I agree that Parliamentary TV is a “good” thing in a democracy- as will be the broadcasting of IWC meetings. But there is a risk that politicians will play to the gallery e.g. that knockabout session full of soundbites called “Prime Minister’s Question Time” adds little to public knowledge other than MPs on both sides acting like football hooligans and their leaders… Read more »

Bystander
Reply to  Cynic
18, June 2013 7:55 pm

But PMQ’s was a disgrace prior to being televised as it was covered in detail by the press. But I for one would love to see drama queens on the Council over acting.

steve s
Reply to  Cynic
18, June 2013 9:41 pm

Yes, Cicero, we’re looking to include cabinet meetings (and others) in this initiative.

john luckett
18, June 2013 9:05 pm

Another positive step. I hope and pray that it brings “those that are governed” closer to “those who govern” – as Martin Bell says. It cannot do any harm. Personally, I would be very disappointed if prayers were stopped at start of Full Council Meeting. Those who do not believe should decline to take part – that is cool, after all how long do prayers take –… Read more »

tryme
Reply to  john luckett
18, June 2013 9:19 pm

Those who DO believe “should” find somewhere else to express themselves, John, and not expect to impose their religious beliefs on those attending a secular meeting. Or expect them to be put to the trouble such that they have to mark themselves out and “decline to take part”.

Bystander
Reply to  tryme
18, June 2013 10:10 pm

Agreed, churches are an appropriate place to pray Council meetings aren’t.

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined