Trees outside County Hall

Councillors slam the cancellation of Isle of Wight council Scrutiny Committee (updated)

The cancellation of the latest Isle of Wight council Scrutiny Committee has been slammed by councillors, who say more meetings are needed “rather than just cancelling at the whim of Cabinet”.

In normal circumstances Scrutiny meetings do not take place in August, but Chair of the Corporate Scrutiny Committee, Cllr Andrew Garratt, told News OnTheWight that time had been set aside in August as a holding meeting for any Covid-19 or other urgent business that might come along.

Garratt: “Staff putting in additional effort”
Cllr Garratt explained that all the Policy and Scrutiny Committee meetings, including an Audit Committee, had been held in July before (all touching on Covid-19 business) and that Group Leaders were having weekly virtual meetings with the Chief Executive.

He said staff have been putting in so much additional effort, over and above normal work,

“I took the view that on balance there wasn’t anything so pressing that it couldn’t wait until September – and if it was so urgent we’d obviously stand up an urgent meeting – it would allow those officers to feel that could get away and have some time off.”

Brodie: Need more meetings rather than cancelling at whim of Cabinet
Cllr Geoff Brodie, twice a former Chair of Scrutiny said,

“I’m not sure that cancellation of the Scrutiny Committee should follow naturally from a Cabinet cancellation. In my day – and indeed other previous chairs – Scrutiny had its own agenda, not just one set out by Cabinet. Is the Chair saying that there is nothing to scrutinise ? Nothing to hold the Cabinet to account for? 

“How about the continuing highways debacle at St Mary’s? The Island Roads’ contract? Covid-19 recovery? The Floating Bridge? Housing proposals for Seaclose and all over Ryde? Budget shortfalls? I would say that they probably need more meetings rather than just cancelling at the whim of Cabinet.”

Stephens: Scrutiny should be actively setting its own agenda
Cllr Ian Stephens told News OnTheWight,

“I think that the IWC Scrutiny Committee has lost its way… the objective is not only to scrutinise cabinet activity, and follow its lead, as that is reactive.

“Scrutiny should be actively setting its own agenda, and seeking answers on performance and impact. Checking on achieving projected any  outcomes and resultant pressures.

“The IWC Scrutiny Committee does not need to cancel meetings, there should be more at this time seeking out progress reports on Covid-19 measures, financial pressures and checking budget balances. The plight of the homeless.

“Only this week a tent exploded in a Ryde car park, are we supporting these people? Where’s the evidence? 

Stephens: Tantamount to closing the shop for the summer
He went on to add,

“I know that when I was chair of Scrutiny .. we took independent witness from our service users and other providers. This is the work that should be undertaken.

“Cancelling meetings of this type is tantamount to closing the shop for the summer.. no business? It is critical to the Council and our Island that Scrutiny is driven and calling decisions to account.. sadly this cancelled meeting shows a lack of commitment by all involved, as I’ve seen no disagreement with the decision.”

Love: Democratic interaction already reduced by IWC
Cllr Karl Love told News OnTheWight,

“I responded immediately to the cancellation protesting against the cancellation as it is a vital mechanism which acts as an important safeguard ensuring there is additional opportunity for reflection and policy and report adjustments.  

“This administration has already reduced the number and amount of democratic interaction which occurs at full county council meetings. There are fewer meetings with a crammed agendas resulting in long meetings.”

Love: Scrutiny meetings bring positivity and reassurance
Cllr Love went on to add,

“Scrutiny provides checks and balances and positive adjustments and amendments.  There’; a great deal to discuss and be discussed. Our council needs to be transparent and inclusive and the scrutiny meetings facilitate better understanding of the public transparency.  I simply don’t accept there is nothing to discuss when we are in the middle of a pandemic and financial crisis.  

“Scrutiny meetings bring positivity and reassurance to the general public. We need to be inspirational and inclusive and I would rather see more meetings. 

“Only by debating in an open public forum can we ensure that our council is providing best value for the people of our Island and the scrutiny is an added value mechanism which enables members of the public to ask questions and have their voice heard. 

“Scrutiny is an important democratic process and there are many things to be scrutinised. I requested that the floating bridge be put on the agenda ASAP after hearing that it was going to be delayed back into service. 

“Explanations given by Isle of Wight Council simply don’t stack up and scrutiny is an important process which can ask questions and require responses.”

Cllr Garratt said there was a very full agenda for the September Scrutiny Meeting, his last as Chair, on 8th September.

Article edit
3.30pm 10th Aug 2020 – Policy meetings held in July (not week before)

Image: © Isle of Wight Council

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
6 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Geoff Brodie
29, May 2018 12:19 pm

Maybe a 37% increase in actual votes, but only a 4% increase in vote share and still a very distant third. Only Labour, comfortably second last time, with the right candidate can challenge the Tory MP.

profoundlife
Reply to  Geoff Brodie
29, May 2018 2:51 pm

You sound like a LibDem leaflet, Geoff ;-)

Geoff Brodie
Reply to  profoundlife
29, May 2018 3:06 pm

I know. They rammed that message down Labour’s throat for 40 years on the Island prior to the Clegg sellout of 2010. The boot is now very clearly on the other foot.

electrickery
Reply to  Geoff Brodie
29, May 2018 3:14 pm

Which foot is that, Geoff? Mainstream, Independent Labour, Militant, Blairite or Momentum? Even you, Geoff, otherwise our best hope, have shown that you can’t tolerate the Labour in-fighting. Oh, for an Opposition!
Whoever you/they choose, please _not_ Julian “Sandpaper” Critchley.

Geoff Brodie
Reply to  electrickery
29, May 2018 3:46 pm

The choice is nothing to do with me. As for which foot ? As ever supportive of the current Labour leader, with whom I have agreed for 35 years.

ian123
Reply to  Geoff Brodie
30, May 2018 12:25 pm

Not really. In the right circumstances, it is possible to see the Tories being defeated at parliamentary level on the island by a LibDem, a Green, or an Independent. But the probability of a Labour win remains as close to zero as makes any difference; the second place scored last time is likely as high as Labour can get given the island’s electorate. All the Labour votes… Read more »

Geoff Brodie
Reply to  ian123
30, May 2018 2:20 pm

Nonsense. So in 2015 17,000 Labour voters should have jumped over to the deposit-losing LibDem with their 2,700 voters or the deposit-losing Independent with her 1,600 votes ? Or, in your dreams, even the Greens ?

ian123
Reply to  Geoff Brodie
30, May 2018 4:07 pm

With respect, you are missing the point, which is how and who can get the extra votes that would be needed to beat the Tories. There are enough people on the island who will never vote Labour to make sure that, for any Labour candidate, it cannot be done.

ian123
Reply to  ian123
30, May 2018 4:11 pm

p.s. Yes, the voting system is unfair, but then Labour should have kept its promise to change it when it had the chance.

Geoff Brodie
Reply to  ian123
30, May 2018 4:11 pm

And enough people on the Island who will never vote anything but Labour. In my 30 years on the Island I have seen one election where voting tactically, but not Labour, worked. And that was 21 years ago…….

electrickery
Reply to  Geoff Brodie
31, May 2018 10:24 am

All the more reason why Labour should encourage them to vote for a party morally and politically aligned with Labour, to ensure a result acceptable to both. Time you started to make more positive noises about the Greens, Geoff.

Geoff Brodie
Reply to  electrickery
31, May 2018 11:41 am

What is it about ‘will never vote anything but Labour’ that is so incomprehensible to Greens ? Build on the Labour vote by abandoning votes for third placed parties – wasted under FPTP.

electrickery
Reply to  Geoff Brodie
31, May 2018 5:08 pm

Sorry your ex-colleagues are so blinkered, Geoff.
But what a shame the government you used to support reneged on its promise to reform our voting system. FPTP defeats democracy.

electrickery
Reply to  Geoff Brodie
31, May 2018 5:23 pm

That’s not “building the Labour vote”, that’s hijacking votes cast in good faith for others. In some countries you can get severely punished for that. Here, anything goes as long as the Tories win.

Geoff Brodie
Reply to  electrickery
1, June 2018 7:19 am

Isn’t ‘hijacking votes’ what your Greens and their candidate in perpetuity advocated at the last two general elections !

bigj
31, May 2018 2:50 pm

People will always blindly vote for an ideology, without considering the consequences.

Having read the comments of Councillor Chris Whitehouse in last weeks County Press, I think I will certainly not be going for the Green Party party at the moment.

I now think Geoff may have a valid point.

electrickery
Reply to  bigj
31, May 2018 5:23 pm

bigj, what makes you think that Cllr Whitehouse has his finger on the pulse? Until he stood down recently he was part of the system that destroyed education on this Island; now he seeks to pass the blame to others for not undoing his and his colleagues’ mistakes. Have we heard him, a champion of education, suggest forming a Trust to take on the Studio School? No,… Read more »

Steve Goodman
Reply to  bigj
1, June 2018 1:04 am

This tip-off just led me to look at a CP to see what the disgraced Private Eye content provider was trying to get away with now.

‘Angry, Ruthless, Self-serving, Exploitative’

Writing about what he is familiar with? At least he is using his own name this time.