Government U-turn on proposed housing targets

Isle of Wight MP, Bob Seely, has led a group of MPs campaigning nationally to reverse “unrealistic and damaging housing targets”

fence of building site with warning signs

The Isle of Wight MP has won an important victory in the battle to stop unwanted greenfield housing development on the Island.

Conservative MP, Bob Seely – who has led a group of MPs campaigning nationally to reverse unrealistic and damaging housing targets – has been told by the Secretary of State for Housing, Robert Jenrick, that the proposed controversial algorithm that dictated the scale and location of housebuilding has now been scrapped.

Seely: “These houses would not have been for Islanders”
Under the proposals, over 1,000 new homes would have been built on the Island each year. Mr Seely has argued this level of housing would damage the local environment and would not address the local housing needs.

“These houses would not have been for Islanders. We do not have the infrastructure for them, and they would damage both our quality of life and our economy.”

Ensure housing built in right areas in line with local need
Welcoming today’s news, Mr Seely said he would continue to lobby Government to ensure that new housing was built in the right areas and in line with local need. Mr Seely said the Island needs affordable homes built on brownfield sites.

Mr Seely said:

“This is good news. I’m grateful to Ministers for listening to members of the public, Councillors and MPs. I am sure MPs will want to look at the re-jigged plans in detail, but this is an initial victory for those who care about their communities.

“Most of all, I want to thank Parish and Town councillors and individual Islanders who wrote to the Secretary of State or took part in the consultation process. The Government listened to our concerns and has acted on them.”

Seeking new designations
Seely said he would also be liaising with the Isle of Wight council to seek new designations that strike a balance between regeneration and preserving the Island’s environment. But he warned that while the controversial 10,000 home target had been dropped, more action was needed to ensure new houses were built in a sustainable way.

Seely said:

“While this is a very welcome announcement, the target to which we now revert is still too high. We need to stop speculative, greenfield sprawl building on the Island. We need to build well-designed, high-quality housing, on brownfield sites in existing communities, in appropriate numbers, for Islanders.

“Whilst this is an important initial victory, I will be working with others to make changes to any new proposed laws to give the Island more flexibility and to allow us to overwhelmingly focus on urban regeneration.

“I always say that I can’t promise to win every battle but I will fight every battle on behalf of the Island. This is a good result, but there is more to be done next year.

“We must also look at new protection for our countryside and landscape, whether by extending the AONB or by creating a new Island Park designation. I will be talking to the Council about this in the coming months to see if we can agree a joint position. I hope we can.”


News shared from the office of Bob Seely. Ed

Image: Gene Hunt under CC BY 2.0

Wednesday, 16th December, 2020 12:56pm

By

ShortURL: http://wig.ht/2o8K

Filed under: Island-wide, Isle of Wight Council, Isle of Wight News, Top story

Any views or opinions presented in the comments below must comply with the Commenting 'House Rules' and are solely those of the author and do not represent those of OnTheWight.

Leave your Reply

3 Comments on "Government U-turn on proposed housing targets"

newest oldest most voted
Eagle eye

I hope this means that the Westridge Farm has been saved and that developments really are built on brownfield sites.

If Island residents really do want to stop greenfield sites being used for housing then we need to support Bob Seely’s suggestion of an Island Park.

Just need to know if there is a plan, if so, how do residents get it put in to action?

Colin
I would be wary of creating a park authority. Elsewhere it has created unelected jobsworths and another set of hoops to jump through. Similarly I wouldn’t want the AONB having any further influence. The alternative? None too sure because you can’t trust the council either. Look at the present lot, keen to build everywhere. Whatever is decided, there needs to be complete transparency and trust, but I’m… Read more »
Angela Hewitt
It is my understanding that it is up to the Council to apply for National Park Status. In the 1990s the Council were opposed to such a designation and obsessed with housing as directed by the officers. As a then councilor I made the suggestion and was shouted down. It is now time for change. We are already a designated bio-sphere this should strengthen the campaign for… Read more »