Isle of Wight Council Government Grant Cut Released (update 6)

For a long time, the Isle of Wight council has known (and been telling us) that the grant money that they get from Central Government will be reduced.

Eric PicklesThe exact figure hasn’t been known, although Head of Finance at the council, Dave Burbage did give some indications at November’s Scrutiny meeting.

Now known
With the announcement today, we now know that the grant will be cut by 3.88% in the first year, followed by 3.21% the following year.

Front Loading Reduced
UPDATE 17:41: Labeling his proposals as “Progressive,” the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, Eric Pickles, this afternoon said in the House of Commons that he would, “Listen to concerns on Front Loading,” meaning that the majority of the cuts were going to be made in the first year.

From what Eric Pickles said later, it sounded like the majority of the savings would have to be made in the first two years, rather than all in the first.

Grants cut less than expected
UPDATE: 16:54 With VentnorBlog now having had a chance to review the specific figures, it appears that the IW council will only lose £6m in Government grants – a difference of £2.5m, from the IW council’s original estimate of a loss of £8.5m.

With the announcement of the actual figure, this could mean an adjustment to the IW council’s cuts.

Details of the figures
UPDATE: 17:07 Further examination of the in-depth figures show that the Formula Grant will drop £9m, from £72.6m (2010-11) to £63.6m in 2011-12.

This will be balanced out by the Specific Grant which will rise from £9.3m to £10.1m over the same period – a rise of £0.8m. This will be supplemented by the NHS funding to support social care and benefit health, which will be £2.1m.

£6.5m further cuts in 2012-13
UPDATE 17:24 Further details: Cuts in year 2012-13 will drop by a further £6.5m.

This is broken down into the Formula Grant dropping a further £5.2m, to £58.4m in 2012-13 from £63.6m in 2011-12. The Specific Grants drops £1.2m, to £8.9m (2012-13) from £10.1m (2011-12).

The newly introduced “NHS funding to support social care and benefit health” drops to £2m in 2012-13, a £100k drop from the initial £2.1m in 2012-12.

What does that mean?
UPDATE 17:33: If you’re wondering what many of the terms mean, the Government has produced a useful guide to help you (and us!) through it.

It’s called “A Plain English Guide to the Local Government Finance Settlement for 2011-12” and we’ve embedded it below for you.

A Plain English Guide to the Local Government Finance Settlement for 2011-12

UPDATE: 07:49 14.Dec.10
All councils
So you have the access to the same information that the journalists have, we’re added, below, all of the data for the next two years, that the government have issued.

We’ve highlighted the Island’s figure in yellow, so you can find them more easily. It’s about a third of the way down.

The figures for the second period (2012-13) are accessed through a tab at the bottom of the spreadsheet. Have fun!

Image: tompagenet under CC BY-SA 2.0

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
19 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mr Justice
13, December 2010 5:10 pm

Quite astonishing!

Meursault
13, December 2010 5:18 pm

So am I right in thinking that the original figure of £17m to be cut in 2011 is now £12m? If so it will now be interesting to see what gets to stay?

Occam
Reply to  Meursault
13, December 2010 6:13 pm

I confidently predict the IOWC, under George Browns orders, will not deviate one single inch from the cuts they propose.

nominative determinism
13, December 2010 6:19 pm

why would the council reduce the amout they are cutting? Theyve over-estimated, and will now have a nice little surplus to spend in the run up to the next local elections…

Ryder
13, December 2010 6:31 pm

…. Because they have £2.5m more than they thought they would have? Which could mean no cuts for the refuge, botanical gardens, waterside pool, wightbus etc.

Occam
Reply to  Ryder
13, December 2010 7:35 pm

As said: I confidently predict the IOWC, under George Browns orders, will not deviate one single inch from the cuts they propose.

Never before have the torys had such an opportunity to destroy public services, they will persue this agenda to the fullest.

wightgeek
13, December 2010 7:15 pm

Hmmmmm. Sadly this might not be as ‘good’ as it appears. The CP are reporting it as a £9m cut in grant funding and that the Council were expecting a £8.4m cut – i.e £600K MORE to be cut than they forecast. The grant adjustment and NHS funding support figures were not mentioned – implying that the Council had already taken them into account or that somehow… Read more »

WIGHTEDUCATE
Reply to  wightgeek
13, December 2010 7:57 pm

What about the Local Development Plan? What is happening about that?

Sponge
Reply to  wightgeek
13, December 2010 9:25 pm

“The CP are reporting it as a £9m cut in grant funding and that the Council were expecting a £8.4m cut – i.e £600K MORE to be cut than they forecast.”

Looking at the VB break down at the bottom, it looks like the CP might be right, but only as far as the initial details. ie The CP haven’t looked at the whole picture.

romeantique
Reply to  Sponge
13, December 2010 9:37 pm

Well the CP are the voice of the Council, and the Council don’t look at the whole picture so it looks like this must be the official Council line

Grateful
13, December 2010 10:04 pm

Well done Simon for getting to info out so quickly, I was watching from work but unable to comment.

The details in the updates were much appreciated.

romeantique
13, December 2010 11:13 pm

Eric Pickles certainly looks a slob doesn’t he?

Sorry VB as I know you don’t like personal remarks but these politicians are constantly lecturing us on the healthy lifestyle we should be leading, so what sort of example is he setting?

biggmarket
Reply to  romeantique
13, December 2010 11:25 pm

The Government at Westminster is hoping that any fall out on cuts to services will hit the Councils rather than Whitehall. Judging by the comments here, Cameron has guessed correctly. Yes folks withdraw EMAs from people the majority of whom are too young to vote and shift the blame on to local councils. In the meantime the over60s keep their bus passes and winter fuel allowances. That… Read more »

zoiner
Reply to  romeantique
14, December 2010 2:21 pm

Typical tory porker, what do you expect?

Don Smith
Reply to  zoiner
14, December 2010 4:23 pm

Porker, more like a heavy hog on route to the sausage factory in Bradford:-)

Mo
Reply to  zoiner
14, December 2010 4:35 pm

He may be a little large, but most Tories are not. Can’t you attack him for his policies?

He’s only the size of you Labours Lord John Prescott and at least he can string a few words together.

Don Smith
Reply to  Mo
14, December 2010 11:46 pm

You must be joking – He could not even read his script correctly in the House today.

He’s a real beer belly and loves his beef and Yorkshire pudding.

Who are you referring to? Onions or Pan-yan?

John
14, December 2010 11:06 am

Another government smokescreen! The reality is that central government is shifting responsibility for the service infrastructure to local government (but without the necessary funding!) In so doing, it is trying to escape any blame when the service infrastructure finally collapses, despite (or because of) maximum profit-seeking by the private companies (Tory friends and sponsors). Remember what happened to the quality of hospital cleaning after it was privatised?… Read more »

zoiner
Reply to  John
14, December 2010 2:23 pm

A bit more the “pawn of darkness” rather than the “prince of darkness”!

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined