Stop sign halt stay away:

Isle of Wight council scrap plans to relocate West Wight primary schools

As reported by OnTheWight last week, plans to relocate Yarmouth Primary School to Freshwater have been scrapped by the Isle of Wight Council — to avoid a costly court case.

The decision follows a threat of legal action against the council, challenging its power to relocate the school to a new site.

The legal challenge said only the governors — who opposed the plans — had the power to agree to a relocation.

Uncertain future
The future for schools in the West Wight now looks uncertain, after the council said it would have to draw up new plans to address the issue of surplus places in the area.

IWC: Persons unknown initiated this action
A council spokesperson said:

“Last week the council withdrew the public notice it issued on 19th July in relation to school places in the West Wight following a legal challenge.

“It is disappointing that persons unknown to this authority initiated this action before the outcomes of the consultation were even known, creating further uncertainty for young people in the area.

“Central to the threat of legal action was the assertion that only the governors of Yarmouth Primary School could agree to its relocation.

“From the very outset of the process, the council’s sole focus has not been about buildings but the children using them, not only now but long into the future.

“Their best interests have been central to the extensive work the council has been doing in trying to ensure we future proof the provision of primary school places in the West Wight.”

The proposal
The plans, now scrapped, proposed closing All Saints’ Primary School, Freshwater, in April next year.

Yarmouth school would then be expanded and relocated to the All Saints’ site when building works were completed there.

Governors opposed the plans
Carla Bradshaw and Mark Webber, co-chairs of governors at the Federation of the Church Schools of Shalfleet and Yarmouth, told the council they opposed the move back in June.

They wrote to Cllr Paul Brading, cabinet member for children’s services, education and skills, telling him the proposal ‘pays no attention to the educational outcomes of the current pupils at the heart of the issue.’

They criticised the increase in planned admission numbers for Yarmouth — class sizes would have doubled from 15 to 30.

IWC exploring other options
To avoid the legal costs of taking the matter to court, the council is now exploring other options.

The council spokesperson continued:

“Mindful of using limited council resources to resolve the matter in court, rather than being spent on the children, the authority has decided to find an alternative way of achieving its aim of reducing capacity and improving the outcomes for young people in the area and a new cabinet paper is being prepared.

“If the cabinet wishes to proceed with a proposal that requires further consultation, then the council will consult as necessary.

“In the meantime, it will look to arrange a meeting with the governors of Yarmouth Primary School.”

Image: marfis75 under CC BY 2.0

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
3 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Alternative Perspective
16, April 2024 2:13 pm

The previous ICU had 6 patient beds, how many ‘extra’ ICU beds does the new unit have?

karen
Reply to  Alternative Perspective
16, April 2024 3:50 pm

And…how many more staff?

Alternative Perspective
Reply to  karen
16, April 2024 4:09 pm

Well each standard ICU bed should have one nurse, a ventilated ICU bed two nurses and a critical care bed three nurses according to the NHS

karen
Reply to  Alternative Perspective
16, April 2024 7:38 pm

Exactly.

VentnorLad
16, April 2024 2:22 pm

It’s wonderful that the ITU has the infrastructure it needs to offer the very best care possible. But what about the rest of the hospital? It’s overcrowded, rundown, understaffed and unfit for purpose. It’s running on the knife edge between crisis and failure on a daily basis. Even a small spike in cases now would lead to a collapse in the hospital’s ability to provide care. It’s… Read more »

karen
Reply to  VentnorLad
16, April 2024 3:53 pm

Shiny and new, and brought to us by the company credit card (aka PFI) which we’ll still be paying off in 10 years time. plus interest. But no new nurses to staff it.

Alternative Perspective
Reply to  karen
16, April 2024 4:12 pm

There build was part of the £48m awarded a few years ago, but given the delay and increase in cost of materials was the original ambition paired back?

karen
Reply to  Alternative Perspective
16, April 2024 7:50 pm

The money was given in 2019, 10 million went for beds at Portsmouth (I kid you not) the rest was supposed to be for infrastructure, building an IT systems across ICU, health hubs and Ambulance service. Given that the buildings and infrastructure incl. IT are owned by private investors and they basically charge the NHS rent back it’s more than a bit sick that government money paid… Read more »

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined