Ten pound notes

Yes, council leader’s allowance may rise, but it’ll still be £7,903 less than David Pugh’s was

Attention grabbing headlines are all very well, but understanding the context, often puts a story in a different light.

The Independent Remuneration Panel – which is made up of four individuals who are, as the panel’s name suggests, independent of the council – have put forward their recommendations for councillors’ allowances.

The allowances are considered by the panel and for the sixth year running sees members’ (ie. councillors) basic allowances remain at £7,903. All councillors receive this allowance.

Leader’s allowance
Those who perform additional roles, such as Leader of the council or Committee chairmen also receive what’s called a Special Responsibility Allowance (SRA).

Under the recommendations put forward by the Panel, the Leader of the council will receive a rise in his SRA from £11,549 to £15,806, giving him a total allowance of £23,709.

Many would argue this is a fairly modest salary for someone governing a multi-million pound ‘business’ (as it was referred to by former CEO Steve Beynon). In fact, the Panel say the current figure of £11,549 is below the regional average of all authorities of £17,626, with the average for unitary councils being £20,176.

The previous leader of the council, David Pugh, received £23,709 on top of his basic allowance, giving him a total allowance of £31,612 (see the documents embedded at the bottom of the article confirming the sums).

The recommendations
The total budget for all allowances currently sits at £475,865, but if the council agree to the recommendations being put forward, the allowances expenditure for 2014/15 would be reduced to £471,696.

The council can choose to reject the recommendations or make amendments.

The figures
Papers for tomorrow’s full council meeting reveal that “the Independent Remuneration Panel has considered a range of evidence and benchmarking data in reaching its conclusions and believes its recommendations are appropriate, justifiable, equitable and affordable”.

The recommendations are valid assuming the council agrees the new governance arrangements (moving to the hybrid-Committee systems).

The papers are embedded below for those who wish to read further into the recommendations. Click on the full screen icon to see larger versions.



Papers from June 2013 meeting



Papers from Jan 2013 meeting



Image: Images of Money under CC BY 2.0

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
24 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mike
18, March 2014 11:27 am

Well what do you expect ? The piece in last weeks paper confirms the lack of transparency and Tory cronyism typical of this ultra right wing rag Why let the truth get in the way of a good story? This is the same paper that was all to quick to name and shame an innocent man with an accusation of fraud which could be said drove him… Read more »

ThomasC
18, March 2014 1:29 pm

WHy do we object to paying council leaders well (provided they are competent)? We pay our MP £60k a year and he doesn’t have nearly so much impact on our immediate environment as our local councillors. If these guys are going to work as councillors full time then it’s a full-time role and should be remunerated appropriately. If this isn’t the case then you limit those representing… Read more »

milly
18, March 2014 2:17 pm

Most Councillors are volunteers and there should be no objection to them being paid. How can we expect them to carry some of this work for zero? Our expectations are very high from our elected candidates but often they are faced with poverty conditions themselves.Some Parish Councillors don’t even have access to technology at home, they do not have offices but are expected to travel around and… Read more »

sam salt
Reply to  milly
18, March 2014 4:11 pm

Milly how right you are. ALL town and parish councillors are volunteers who give up their time to their local communities free. You are also correct that they do not, in the majority of cases, receive any expenses for car use, parking, telephone, internet and have to provide their own IT equipment. However IW Councillors are different. Not only do they get a substantial allowance, they receive… Read more »

FactNotFiction
Reply to  sam salt
18, March 2014 8:55 pm

A little research is necessary! Councillors may receive an allowance, whether you consider £7k is substantial is subjective, but you are wrong about them receiving expenses! They are NOT entitled to any as all costs, mileage, postage, phone calls, printer inks, paper etc. all has to come out of their allowance

sam salt
Reply to  FactNotFiction
18, March 2014 9:38 pm

Thank you for correcting the assumption that everything could be claimed by Isle of Wight County Council Councillors. I do not believe I said that, only that IT equipment and phones were supplied and expenses could be claimed. I am at a loss here because if you look on the Council website there is information about travel and subsistence that councillors have claimed in the year 2012/2013… Read more »

phil jordan
Reply to  sam salt
19, March 2014 1:48 am

just a little one: “on the Council website there is information about travel and subsistence that councillors have claimed in the year 2012/2013 showing each and everyone has claimed monies. Has this now stopped? Yes. We are paid an annual allowance and for some, SRA’s (special responsibilty allowances) That’s it. With the exception of travel on the mainland where expenses can be claimed. On the Island they… Read more »

milly
Reply to  sam salt
19, March 2014 12:17 am

It seems to me, with the last lot, it was the ones that had the so called “business sense” made the mess and all of the mistakes.

I prefer good honest people with “organisational sense”, which is different – and usually a lot better.

realdemocracy
18, March 2014 3:09 pm

It is easy to be critical of the CP, and I take the point about Mr Pugh, but given that the Indies are slinging staff out of the door and the leader talks about “re-engineering” rather than cuts, it is a bit rich for Stephens to take a 37 per cent pay hike. He chose to take the leadership role on at the current allowance rate as… Read more »

Simon Perry
Admin
Reply to  realdemocracy
18, March 2014 3:42 pm

I don’t believe that ‘Stephens’ has taken the suggested increase. It’s a recommendation, as you’ll read above. The _recommended_ 37% rise is only in the Special Responsibility Allowance (SRA), which is one of the two parts that makes up the Leader’s allowance. The base is £7,903, which will remain the same. If you were to look at the difference ‘in the round’ – as most would –… Read more »

Drone
Reply to  realdemocracy
18, March 2014 3:56 pm

“Wouldn’t Mr Pugh have been pilloried here if he had done similar, so soon after taking the job on?” What do you mean so soon? Ian Stephens has been leader for almost a year and is soon to be replaced. David Pugh took £23k plus basic allowance and Ian Stephens takes £11.5k plus basic allowance. It’s not hard to work out who and why would have been… Read more »

sam salt
Reply to  Drone
18, March 2014 4:21 pm

Actually I am quite happy about what David Pugh received in his remuneration package. He was a face we all knew, like him or not. He took the flack, made decisions, not always popular but he was there at the front. Ian Stephens is far different. I see neither leadership qualities, a man getting the job done or someone doing a good job. It has to be… Read more »

steve s
Reply to  sam salt
18, March 2014 5:47 pm

You’re happy with David Pugh receiving what he did because he was a face we all knew? Seriously?

Ian Stephens is an excellent leader. I know because I work with him pretty much every day.

Black Dog
Reply to  steve s
18, March 2014 6:26 pm

Councillor Stephens is a verry nice chap but a leader he is not. Leadership is not a quality he popossess. He is unable to delegate and continues to get involved in areas of commerce that appear to be beyond his comfort zone. Now that Councillor Stephens has done a year it is time someone else to take charge and if I read things correctly there is a… Read more »

sam salt
Reply to  steve s
18, March 2014 6:40 pm

Did I hit a nerve Steve? I am sorry that you took one comment and honed in on that. We (the Islanders) knew David Pugh was the Leader, like it or not. We do not though hear or see Ian Stephens doing things for us. I am glad you see him pretty much every day and work with him. However, all to often it is through you… Read more »

tryme
Reply to  steve s
18, March 2014 10:21 pm

I’m all in favour of the Leader being Mr/Ms Nice Guy! That sets a tone for all to follow, and those cllrs who just want to be politicking dogs-in-a-manger are shown up by comparison. Pugh took the flack!? He MADE the flack! He was childishly baiting & gloating. Better to have a prominent Leader marching us all in the wrong direction, than have a thoughtful one behind… Read more »

phil jordan
Reply to  steve s
19, March 2014 1:20 am

Black dog: “Leadership is not a quality he popossess.” I disagree strongly. Good Leadership has brought us to where we are. “He is unable to delegate” ..Is absolute nonsense. Utter nonsense. Ian does not get involved in any direct way in my own portfolio…..whatsoever. Or that of any other Cabinet member. “continues to get involved in areas of commerce that appear to be beyond his comfort zone.:… Read more »

Steve Goodman
Reply to  steve s
19, March 2014 10:59 am

B.D.- Like you, I find that our council leader is a nice chap; I would also like to add that my experience is very different to yours. I have seen how hard he works on our behalf, and I have seen that his style of leadership encourages a happier, more co-operative following than the bullying style of others. He gladly works with anybody for our common good;… Read more »

Chris
Reply to  sam salt
18, March 2014 6:02 pm

I’m more aware of what our current councillors are doing than the last lot.

phil jordan
Reply to  sam salt
19, March 2014 1:10 am

just a little one: I’m deflated! I probably post here as much, or more than any other Councillor…… yet no mention :0( Anyway, Firstly, let’s get this absolutely correct. Ian took a 50% cut in his remuneration last year..long before there was any proposed increase that STILL pays him less, a good deal less, than the last Leader. Secondly, we have an Independent remuneration panel that advises… Read more »

sam salt
Reply to  phil jordan
19, March 2014 8:13 am

Sorry I ignored you in my previous comment Phil, and yes you do post regularly. Perhaps my experience of David Pugh was different to others. David would always answer my e-mails, return my calls and I found him pleasant enough, even if I didn’t agree with him. Others such as Dawn Cousins and Edward Giles also had an open dialect with me. Maybe because of the position… Read more »

phil jordan
Reply to  realdemocracy
19, March 2014 1:30 am

realdemocracy: Let’s get this clear. The “current allowance rate” set in May 2013, was set by the incoming administration – that is the Independents – who set the Leaders allowance at about 50% below that which was current at the time and paid to the then Leader Cllr Pugh. In addition, the overall pay to ALL Councillors, in total sum, was reduced from the previous administration. An… Read more »

tryme
19, March 2014 5:59 am

Bravo on your posts here, Phil! I suspect some people miss the ‘entertainment’ of the furores surrounding the last administration, and confuse unassuming hard work, stable, intelligent and cooperative workings of the present one, with lack of activity. People reading you here will very effectively be put right on that. I just hope that the CP, (if they have any sense of fairness), or simply people’s first-hand… Read more »

Black Dog
19, March 2014 10:45 am

@Phil Jordan I admire your misplaced loyalty. Sadly this administration lacks lsadership and structure and if you really thought about it I am sure you will agree. How many times have you sat in the chamber and felt frustration listening to mind numbing deliveries from Councillor Stephens? I still say that he is a nice chap but no leader. I know that your all Independents and as… Read more »

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined