john-giddings-and-sharon-corr

Isle of Wight Festival’s John Giddings awarded ‘Outstanding Contribution’ accolade

Lisa shares this latest news from the Isle of Wight Festival HQ. Ed


Much to his total surprise, Isle of Wight Festival and Solo Agency founder John Giddings was presented with the Outstanding Contribution accolade at Wednesday night’s Live Music Business Awards.

Best Festival Award
His team had already won Best Festival (over 40,000 capacity) earlier in the evening and when video clips of U2, David Bowie, Madonna and Sting hit the screens that it sunk home.

Outstanding Contribution is not presented to someone who is simply successful in their career, the recipient has to have made a wider contribution to the industry or charitable causes.

Raised thousands for charities
Giddings and his wife Caroline are credited with raising hundreds of thousands of pounds a year for a range of charities, among themStand Up For Cancer, Well Child, Ticket For Troops and St Catherine’s School on the Isle of Wight.

Messages from the Stars
The Corr’s Sharon Corr made the presentation, followed by video messages from Genesis and Mike & The Mechanics’ Mike Rutherford, Iggy Pop, Pharrell Williams and Live Nation Entertainment global touring CEO, Arthur Fogel.

A full list of winners is available on the Website.

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
15 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
VentnorLad
14, October 2016 8:56 am

And the award for most blatant attempt to get hard working tax payers to shoulder the burden of your Festival costs goes to…

Ian Young
Reply to  VentnorLad
14, October 2016 12:18 pm

Think the assertion that Mr Giddings was trying to get hard working tax payers to shoulder the burden of his Festival costs is a bit of an exaggeration. In any case Mr Giddings is not in the same league as the promoters of some other entertainment events when it comes to requesting, and indeed receiving tax payer hand-outs. But of course those who receive these hand-outs will… Read more »

Caconym
Reply to  VentnorLad
14, October 2016 12:20 pm

Giddings is a businessman. His *job* is to try to cut his costs as much as possible, by any (legal) means possible.

Giddings was, clearly, taking the mickey with his request for free (or paying a pittance) for the use of Seaclose Park. The fact that the Council would have been suckered into agreeing to it if it weren’t for the public outcry speaks volumes.

VentnorLad
Reply to  Caconym
14, October 2016 12:53 pm

I think the cost to his reputation for what was an unnecessary and I’ll-conceived attempt to save a few quid will cost him more than the potential savings he envisaged.

For that, I’m glad. He was extracting the urine out of all of us.

VentnorLad
Reply to  VentnorLad
14, October 2016 12:54 pm

“ill-conceived”

steve stubbings
Reply to  Caconym
14, October 2016 1:57 pm

That gift of prescience must come in awfully handy at times, Suruk.

Caconym
Reply to  steve stubbings
14, October 2016 7:05 pm

Prescience, no.

Common sense that £13k for the hire of Seaclose Park is a tad cheap, yes.

steve stubbings
Reply to  Caconym
14, October 2016 7:41 pm

“The fact that the council would have been suckered into agreeing with it…” is the prescience to which I was referring.
How on earth would you know how the council executive would have treated the request?

VentnorLad
Reply to  Caconym
14, October 2016 8:00 pm

It’s a good point from Steve!

When the Executive don’t even know what they’ve done after the event, how could we mortals possibly know their intent beforehand?

Caconym
Reply to  Caconym
15, October 2016 9:25 am

***”How on earth would you know how the council executive would have treated the request?”***

Oh, I don’t know. Asda, maybe?

okayanyway
Reply to  Caconym
16, October 2016 8:11 pm

The councils ‘executive’ would have done what the officers told them to do. not their electorate!

phil jordan
Reply to  Caconym
17, October 2016 6:20 pm

okayanyway: I am afraid your idea(s) about how the Executive works is wildly adrift of reality. Forecasting in hindsight what decision might have been taken by the Executive is an interesting vocation but as a member of the Executive I can confirm that i have not been *told* what i should have done in this respect. I can probably safely say that none of my colleagues have… Read more »

phil jordan
Reply to  Caconym
17, October 2016 6:43 pm

StS: There is absolutely no connection between this matter and a successful decision over the Asda development. I’ll keep this brief but there was commercially confidential information provided to Executives when that matter was being considered. I cannot explain what that important information contained other than to say that the Authority, under ALL prevailing conditions and circumstances achieved the best possible outcome from the eventual agreement with… Read more »

nico
Reply to  Caconym
14, October 2016 6:30 pm

Noone agreed with me, but I suspect I was right that a report representing Giddings’ request and pov was bound to be prepared for a Council meeting, given potential implications. How cllrs might have reacted to it would have been another matter altogether.

yjc
14, October 2016 9:27 am

“Much to his total surprise”………..

and every one elses after last week!

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined