Fire crew

Isle of Wight firefighters raise ‘serious concerns’ over safety of planned ‘revamp’

This open letter is written by serving Isle of Wight Firefighters representing their views of the ongoing Service Review. It has been distributed by the Fire Brigades Union on their behalf to all members of the Isle of Wight Council ahead of plans to ‘revamp’ the service. Ed


Dear Councillor

We are contacting you at unavoidable short notice with our concerns about the forthcoming cabinet meeting to decide and approve the restructuring of the Isle of Wight Fire and Rescue Service.

We have been told the options are no longer being put forward for public consultation and would urge you to question why this process is being rushed through.

It states in the committee report that the IWFRS has engaged all staff and trade unions through the service review. As a workforce, we understand the need for changes in ways of working and we are open to ideas that will provide a safer and more resilient service.

Serious concerns
However, the preferred option has not been shown to the majority of fire service employees until very recently and we have some serious concerns about the changes that are being proposed and the reasons and haste behind these changes.

These include the following points:

  • The proposed reduction in fire appliance crew from 5 riders to 4 riders on the first appliance to attend an incident such as a house fire. This limits the actions that the first crew can take to carry out rescues and tackle the fire until a second appliance arrives.

    This second appliance would NOT be guaranteed to arrive promptly, particularly at night when as few as 4 wholetime crew may be immediately available for the whole Island. The service will rely even more heavily on retained firefighters that have already seen cuts to establishment at most fire stations.

  • An initial crew of four cannot establish a safe system of work at other incidents such as Road Traffic Collisions. These incidents rely on the team approach with a minimum first crew of five firefighters.
  • You will be told that other services use this crewing policy. However other services can rely on the proximity of other wholetime stations to guarantee the next appliance. We will not have this guarantee at night time on the Island.
  • This proposal does not address the current low numbers and availability of retained firefighters. Recruitment and retention of retained firefighters, together with ideas to utilise their availability better should be addressed as a priority before proposals that will reduce wholetime posts.
  • The proposed options are based on historical incident data rather a current review of risk which has not been implemented.
  • The Peer Review of the Integrated Risk Management Plan (IRMP) that was last produced in 2014 stated that ‘capacity, resilience and sustainability within the Service’ were issues. The current preferred option for change does not state how it addresses these issues, especially when recommending a reduction in workforce.
  • The proposal suggests that the ‘locality model’ will improve productivity regarding collaborative working and community safety initiatives. This is a positive aim but there is no mention of how this will be achieved alongside a 15% reduction in workforce.

Fundamental changes
We feel that the changes proposed are major and fundamental. There has been a lack of both public and workforce consultation and there seems to be an unnecessary haste in its implementation.

This would ultimately seem to be driven by concerns other than that of maintaining a safe and resilient service.

Image: © Used with the kind permission of Anthony Joyce

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
1 Comment
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
GavinE
8, October 2024 7:11 pm

They look very nice and shiny but will they actually fit down the roads that we have here ? I can’t count the number of times I’ve been driving and confronted with a huge bus heading my way! Missed chance to buy smaller buses IMO

Tamara
Reply to  GavinE
8, October 2024 11:51 pm

Southern Vectis bus drivers are very skilled at avoiding collisions and passing other wide vehicles on our narrow roads. I don’t know if the electric buses will be wider than the diesel and hybrid ones, but their batteries are far heavier than a tank of diesel. Their environmental impact will, however, be far less.

chippy2
Reply to  Tamara
9, October 2024 12:32 pm

Due to the heavier weight, these buses, like all EVs, will cause more road damage and leave more tyre rubber and brake dust particles in the air than the current ones. I don’t see that as an environmental improvement. As for cost (see below) I don’t see lower fares coming out of this. Also due to the weight increase in the event of a road accident the… Read more »

Tamara
Reply to  chippy2
9, October 2024 9:25 pm

You forget that electric cars are also considerably heavier than petrol or diesel cars, and they will cause more wear and tear on our roads. The Isle of Wight Council needs to impress on Island Roads the need to build our roads to better withstand this. And electric cars could also potentially do more damage to other vehicles and to pedestrians if they hit them. But electric… Read more »

VentnorLad
Reply to  GavinE
9, October 2024 12:35 am

I can’t count the number of times I’ve been driving and confronted with a huge bus heading my way! It’ll be the same as the number of times a bus driver has been driving and confronted by you driving their way. Narrow roads are a feature of the UK road network throughout the land. I’m sure that fact was taken into account during the development of these… Read more »

broc5ilv4
Reply to  GavinE
9, October 2024 1:12 am

Have you considered driving slower and anticipating this rather than just panicking at the last minute?
The bus drivers all go really slow in obvious danger spots. Maybe you and everyone else should too?

GavinE
Reply to  broc5ilv4
9, October 2024 7:34 pm

Thanks to everyone who replied – to be clear I’m just saying that there’s many roads here that are wider than a car plus a bus so a narrower bus would help? Nothing to do with speed or careful bus divers as they don’t make the road wider I’m afraid

Stuart George
Reply to  GavinE
9, October 2024 8:13 pm

Or a narrower car?

GavinE
Reply to  Stuart George
9, October 2024 8:50 pm

Realistically that’s not possible
E as I’m sure you know

Tamara
Reply to  GavinE
9, October 2024 10:04 pm

The main problem is that there are far too many cars on the roads – both being driven and parked, often on the pavement, causing obstructions and endangering pedestrians. Parked vehicles narrow our roads so much that buses and other wide vehicles have difficulty in squeezing through. Crossing roads has become more and more hazardous for pedestrians in recent decades. This year the Government enacted a law… Read more »

GavinE
Reply to  Tamara
10, October 2024 7:27 pm

So I guess you agree having smaller buses as I suggested would help ?

ovener
8, October 2024 7:32 pm

This is part of £200m in funds form the Labour Government

eddo
Reply to  ovener
9, October 2024 8:29 am

omit the word ‘Funds’ add ‘debt’

neilpalmer400
Reply to  ovener
9, October 2024 9:42 pm

In other words, the taxpayers are footing the bill as the government has no money of their own.

Tamara
8, October 2024 11:40 pm

It’s good that these buses are being built in the UK, taxpayers’ money going to keep workers employed in Northern Ireland.

The two electric buses trialled by Southern Vectis were manufactured by Yutong in China and by Volvo in Sweden.

eddo
9, October 2024 8:19 am

At a cost of 500k each, double the cost of a standard bus I trust the investment on the part of the Tax payer will have it’s reward, prior to meeting St Peter.