Eli at the RSPCA

Isle of Wight RSPCA touched by support, but more needed

An emergency appeal launched to help the Island’s RSPCA branch provide animal welfare services throughout the Covid-19 outbreak and beyond has reached over £20,000.

More money needed to help provide services
RSPCA Isle of Wight branch manager Suzanne Pugh said the local organisation has been heartened and inspired by the generosity shown so far, but added more money was needed to help provide services at a time when income remained affected by Covid-19.

In particular, travel restrictions continue to affect the RSPCA’s five-star Bohemia Boarding facilities, income from which supports animal rescue work.

Staff really touched by goodwill and support
Suzanne said:

“With demand for our services as high as ever, but with income from our usual sources still well down, the money people have so generously donated has provided an absolute lifeline. That is true not just in a financial sense, but also in terms of boosting morale. Staff have been really touched that there is so much goodwill and support out there in the community.

“There is a still a long way to go before we are back on an even keel but what the success of the appeal so far has shown us all is that there is still hope – we are all so very grateful.”

Seven-year-old raised £50
Suzanne said donations had varied from an generous gift of £5,000 to the £50 raised by young RSPCA supporter Elias Foster who had handed over pocket money and cash gathered by helping out with daily chores for his family as well as giving massages to his grandma!

Elias, seven, from Cowes, handed over the cash and also a supply of blankets he had collected from friends and relatives. After making an appointment to drop off the donations, he was delighted to be given a short tour of the RSPCA’s animal rescue centre at Godshill.

Elias said:

“When I heard animals might be in danger I really wanted to help.”

Naming stray kitten
During his visit, Elias was also asked to name a stray five-week-old kitten brought into the centre by two kind residents a few hours earlier. Elias chose the name Hazel who is currently doing well under the care of the centre.

Though affiliated to the national RSPCA, the Island organisation is stand-alone and must raise its own funds to provide its animal adoption and welfare services.

Anyone wanting to make a donation to the appeal can do so via the donation button on the RSPCA Isle of Wight Website or call 01983 840287 or Text RSPCAIOW to 70470 donate any amount.


News shared by Anna on behalf of RSPCA Isle of Wight. Ed

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
0 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Luisa Hillard
8, December 2016 8:04 am

So immigration is his main motivation for Brexit then. Bit embarrassing for his Prime Minister, Teresa May, that Andrew has pointed out she failed miserably to reduce immigration during her time as Home Secretary. From articles I’ve read, it’s looking like we will still have free movement across the EU after Brexit, should that actually happen. To put this fear-mongering press release in perspective, I wonder what… Read more »

steve stubbings
Reply to  Luisa Hillard
8, December 2016 8:12 am

Indeed! Did his press release get mixed up in the post with the one from Britain First? :-S

Nitonia
Reply to  steve stubbings
8, December 2016 8:18 am

It does sound like something posted by Britain First doesn’t it?

The biggest threat to social cohesion is not immigration, it is the right wing press and politicians who demonise everyone who wasn’t fortunate enough to grow up in the home counties with a silver spoon in their gob!

okayanyway
Reply to  Nitonia
8, December 2016 10:05 am

Is it only Independent IOW Councillors commenting on here now?? such a negative bias towards anything Conservative. Not so much to say about your colleague who had the remit for public health and road safety.

You are all hypocrites the lot of you.

Luisa Hillard
Reply to  steve stubbings
8, December 2016 10:20 am

I’m actually quite concerned!

I.Reader
Reply to  Luisa Hillard
8, December 2016 10:17 am

Too busy dreaming of a white christmas to comment on the changes to communities and threats to social cohesion resulting from the unsustainable extra costs of privatising and cutting services, politicians and senior civil servants profiting from privatisation, the low wage economy, corporate welfare, having to deal with those excessively consuming drink, drugs, and junk food, our growing, ageing, and ailing population, inflated housing costs, and more… Read more »

Caconym
Reply to  I.Reader
8, December 2016 10:54 am

Speaking of our ageing and ailing population, you should see the comments on the BBC article on how long people have to wait for hospital beds. The problem is largely due to bed blocking because there are no places in the community to release patients to. This is largely caused by government cuts to local authorities. But did that stop the usual crowd of rabid swivel-eyed loons… Read more »

Luisa Hillard
Reply to  Caconym
8, December 2016 11:33 am

Very sad. Just yesterday I was told about an elderly gentleman that was kept in hospital for 9 months because he lived in a flat with no lift.

The government appears to be deliberately underfunding social care and the NHS. The cynic in me says this is to make privatisation more publicly acceptable.

European
8, December 2016 8:12 am

This press release smacks of xenophobia if you ask me.

VentnorLad
8, December 2016 8:18 am

I wonder if AT would be kind enough to explain the mechanism by which immigration “threatens social cohesion”? I simply don’t see it. I have friends now living in the UK from all over the world. They all work hard and contribute to the economy and their local communities. My life is richer for sharing parts of their culture and they are all receptive to sharing parts… Read more »

Island Monkey
8, December 2016 8:26 am

As usual, the hard left rush to tell us they know best, that we should operate a no limits immigration policy. Thankfully sensible people know that we must have limits, in the interests of social cohesion.

Free of the EU this is now possible.

VentnorLad
Reply to  Island Monkey
8, December 2016 8:30 am

As Mr Turner doesn’t engage with the electorate, perhaps you can explain for him how immigration “threatens social cohesion”?

European
Reply to  Island Monkey
8, December 2016 8:33 am

It’s hilarious that every time someone disagrees with Andrew Turner’s view, they are labelled “hard left” by Island Mankey.

VentnorLad
Reply to  European
8, December 2016 8:35 am

Rather more amusing is that he uses it pejoratively, but I take it as a compliment!

Caconym
Reply to  European
8, December 2016 8:55 am

Mankey’s “Hard Left” is anyone to the left of Oswald Mosley, it seems.

Luisa Hillard
Reply to  Caconym
8, December 2016 10:06 am

LOL

Luisa Hillard
Reply to  Island Monkey
8, December 2016 10:05 am

No one has, as yet, suggested unlimited immigration. We don’t actually have that now, despite what you might have read on the side of a bus. The UK has full border control for any immigrants outside of the EU – particularly all those ‘Muslim countries’ that the ‘hard right’ are so frightened of in the Middle East. I believe that many people mistakenly voted for Brexit on… Read more »

Island Monkey
Reply to  Luisa Hillard
8, December 2016 11:11 am

No-one? It”s Labour policy, Corbyn says no limits. This view is shared by the Green’s and Liberal Democratic supporters, but thankfully a clear majority disagrees with such a potty policy. Uncontrolled immigration is not good for Britain but controlled immigration certainly is, even if lefty OTW posters don’t agree and would rather be hysterical.

Luisa Hillard
Reply to  Island Monkey
8, December 2016 11:45 am

The hysteria appears to be solely reserved for those crying, “Local services, for Local people.” Meanwhile local services are run by immigrants because English staff are emigrating for better pay and conditions abroad. As a person of the centre-Left I can see some benefit in an Australian points-based system but that wouldn’t be needed if we provided a decent education and pay to encourage home-grown professionals in… Read more »

Island Monkey
Reply to  Luisa Hillard
8, December 2016 12:22 pm

Your post (as ever) reveals a contradiction. If only we paid people more we wouldn’t need immigrants? That is what you are saying. And where would all the money come from, Oh, I know, more tax for nasty corporations. Left wing thinking is always cliched muddled and often lazy. I wish you, and other ‘independents’ would have the courage to admit you are either socialists or Green’s.… Read more »

Luisa Hillard
Reply to  Luisa Hillard
8, December 2016 12:41 pm

Of course I am a socialist because I believe that people are more important than corporations. Anyone who believes in public services run for public benefit, rather than profit, is. I do not however subscribe to any political party at this point. Easier to be certain which ones I do not like. According to your position immigration is terrible for the country and a drain on resources.… Read more »

whenever whatever
Reply to  Luisa Hillard
8, December 2016 8:11 pm

what? ‘We disagree that there is not enough money to do this. It is a matter of priorities. It the government can give MPs an 11% pay rise, free house, free heating and electricity, decorate palaces, subsidise oil companies, give tax breaks, write off expenses fiddling, build a high speed railway, pay for a nuclear power plant to subsidise an energy company, Trident, endless wars and bombing… Read more »

Caconym
8, December 2016 8:49 am

Oh dear, It seems our MP has a poor grasp on reality, and not very good reading comprehension. Lets read the question that was put to the voters on June 23rd: **”Should the United Kingdom remain a member of the European Union or leave the European Union?”*** Does anyone see any mention of “taking back control of our borders”? I certainly don’t. So, that’s his reading comprehension… Read more »

Luisa Hillard
Reply to  Caconym
8, December 2016 10:25 am

Yes, but those are inconvenient facts. Probably pointed out by ‘experts’ that aren’t interested in promoting populist nationalism.

Caconym
Reply to  Luisa Hillard
8, December 2016 11:00 am

I do wonder how long Theresa May is going to be able to keep up the charade. She’s an intelligent woman, I assume, so must understand that project cake-and-eat-it is doomed to fail. I just get this image of someone falling from a very high building. On the way down people at each floor hear them saying “I’ll be fine, I’ll be fine, I’ll be fine” Right… Read more »

Luisa Hillard
Reply to  Caconym
8, December 2016 11:50 am

I do believe she must be struggling to peddle something she does not believe in. Politically and morally she’s between a rock and a hard place. If she doesn’t push forward some of her Party will defect to UKIP. If she does push forward, regardless of the obvious consequences then the moderates (and those with business interests) will also revolt. Handy scapegoat needed. Scotland perhaps. Or a… Read more »

Caconym
Reply to  Luisa Hillard
8, December 2016 11:59 am

I think the scapegoat is already in place. His name is Boris.

Luisa Hillard
Reply to  Luisa Hillard
8, December 2016 12:14 pm

I ‘almost’ feel sorry for him. Except that I consider his whole public image to be an affectation. And his goals may be more subtle than we can yet fathom. He also was historically Remain.

Follow the money.

Caconym
Reply to  Luisa Hillard
8, December 2016 12:44 pm

Boris is a lot more intelligent than is public persona suggests. Unfortunately a lot of that intelligence is self-serving. It seems fairly likely that he joined the leave campaign in order to further his political career. He expected the result of the referendum to be remain, and to pick up a nice cabinet post as a consolation prize. When you look at the images of him when… Read more »

billy builder
8, December 2016 9:28 am

This sounds to me like a rehash, all be it worded more gentle, of “the rivers of blood” speach from another far-right Tory. The Tory party have learched to the far right and are now almost indistinguishable from UKIP/BMP The country need immigration to drive growth and provide support for many areas of our economy, not least the NHS and care services. Without access to immigrant labour… Read more »

Oldie
Reply to  billy builder
8, December 2016 9:45 am

Get real! You’re living in a little Island universe all of your own! Andrew Turner is merely stating the obvious. Do a bit of googling and see what’s going on in America, Europe, the Middle East! The rest of the UK. Nearer to home even Angela Merkel in Germany is worried she won’t get in the next election. This week she has said her open door policy… Read more »

Caconym
Reply to  Oldie
8, December 2016 10:42 am

Errm, no. MPs voted to start formal talks on Brexit because that is what the electorate voted for. I don’t see anything startling in this They also supported a Labour motion calling for Parliament to “properly scrutinise” the government in its proposals for leaving the EU. Again, like a lot of other Brexiteers, you don’t actually understand what you voted for. You just voted to leave the… Read more »

Oldie
Reply to  Caconym
8, December 2016 11:53 am

So everyone who doesn’t have the same political view as you is a racist! 52% of the voters are racists according to you! According to you 52% of the voters don’t know why they voted Leave the EU. According to you 48% of the voters know why they voted Remain in the EU. You’re talking like a fascist. In your dreams. You’re just poor losers who can’t… Read more »

Nitonia
Reply to  Oldie
8, December 2016 11:59 am

No one has said that 52% of the voters were racist.

Andrew Turner’s words though I believe betray a latent racism. As for talking like a fascist, that’s an ironic accusation.

Suggest you google other examples of politicians blaming lack of social cohesion economic downturns on immigrants and ethnic minorities. See where that got the world.

Caconym
Reply to  Oldie
8, December 2016 12:09 pm

Errm, again, no. The UK voted to leave the EU, so we leave. I’m happy with that decision. The trouble is there are a lot of people who think they voted for a whole lot more than that. You also need to improve your diction. You seem to have no idea what Fascism actually is. For your information and education: **”a political philosophy, movement, or regime (as… Read more »

Luisa Hillard
Reply to  Oldie
8, December 2016 12:24 pm

Suruk is spot on. Leaving the EU of itself does not stipulate whether we will break any current border or trading agreements. It does appear highly likely that all will pretty much ‘remain’ the same in all but name. I have yet to decide if David Icke being in favour of Brexit on the basis that it will disrupt the New World Order is correct. If he… Read more »

bones
Reply to  billy builder
8, December 2016 3:51 pm

Enoch Powell’s speech came to fruition I’m afraid. He was called a racist but was brave enough to be a realist.. It seems to me that you are called a racist if you whistle Ba Ba black sheep in the bath. I wonder how you would feel if you lived in Bradford ? And before you say it, no I’m not racist.

Caconym
Reply to  bones
8, December 2016 4:12 pm

The really bizarre thing with the whole “Brexit will solve the immigration problem” thing is that we are actually quite similar in culture to the EU immigrants that Brexit will allow us to control. Most Eastern Europeans I know are actually eager to integrate. The cultures that tend not to integrate well are those whose entry we already have full control over and whose immigration will not… Read more »

billy builder
Reply to  Caconym
8, December 2016 4:50 pm

My mother-in-law voted for BRexit because there are already to many asians in Leicester and BRexit will stop that – won’t it !

Caconym
Reply to  billy builder
8, December 2016 6:10 pm

My mother-in-law was moaning about how much her grocery bill had gone up.

Mrs Slayer just looked at her and said “Well, you voted for it”

Vix Lowthion
Reply to  Caconym
8, December 2016 5:21 pm

Whereas apparently many Asian origin voters in Bradford voted Leave because they were promised a larger immigration quota post Brexit.

Everyone was promised cake, and no one will be happy with the amount they are given.

Smithy
8, December 2016 10:02 am

Oh he is alive then.
Not heard from this guy purporting to represent the the people of the Island since he asked for our vote.
Just another politician out for the money and himself.

Colin
8, December 2016 10:03 am

Now read the article again and for EU substitute UK and for UK substitute Island.

There is as much chance of limiting entry to the UK as there is of stopping the overners migrating to the Island.

Transpose the arguement and think about it.

Robert Jones
8, December 2016 11:17 am

My dentist is Romanian – and incidentally excellent. I’ve been treated in hospital over the last few years as various things have snapped, grown where they shouldn’t, or dropped off (I exaggerate slightly) and been treated by a consultant from Hungary, and three others from the Indian sub-continent. I had a particularly entertaining time a few years ago when I broke my wrist and had two Asian-origin… Read more »

Island Monkey
Reply to  Robert Jones
8, December 2016 11:21 am

I agree, with every word. All I would add is that word, control. No country in the world can cope with uncontrolled immigration. To pretend otherwise is beyond barmy.

Island Monkey
8, December 2016 11:17 am

We will leave the EU and we will regain control of our immigration policy. If the price we pay is leaving the single market, then that is the price we will pay. Those 89 in parliament and their EU loving supporters are going to have to accept what Brexit actually means. I do feel most are confused, if not, they’re being mischievous. The people spoke, the only… Read more »

Luisa Hillard
Reply to  Island Monkey
8, December 2016 12:09 pm

Brexit means Brexit. Don’t worry about the details. Civil servants are busy copying and pasting as we speak.

Caconym
Reply to  Island Monkey
8, December 2016 12:26 pm

Brexit means we leave the EU. That is all it means.

The only person who is confused about that around here appears to be yourself.

Vix Lowthion
Reply to  Island Monkey
8, December 2016 1:24 pm

We already have control of our immigration policy. Our net migration is not so high just because of the EU but because of non-EU immigration too. It’s fully within our powers to stop that years ago. But we didn’t. Why not? Because we need them. We need our immigrant workers. We are a growing economy *because* they are here.

Island Monkey
Reply to  Vix Lowthion
8, December 2016 1:37 pm

You want the market to decide? Priceless.

Island Monkey
Reply to  Island Monkey
8, December 2016 2:09 pm

Usefully, you accidentally highlight a massive inconsistency. Green’s want fewer cars, less flying and energy consumption, but hang on, millions of new people means more of everything, including demand. You’re hoist by your own petard.

Luisa Hillard
Reply to  Island Monkey
8, December 2016 3:56 pm

I expect that the Greens take a more world-wide view than some parties when it comes to environmental issues. As such having more immigrants arriving in the UK is unlikely to raise overall global pollution or demand. Demand for what though? Most manufacturing seems to happen in China these days so those people are the ones who suffer the pollution caused by our throw away culture. People… Read more »

Jon
Reply to  Island Monkey
8, December 2016 7:51 pm

“I expect that the Greens take a more world-wide view than some parties when it comes to environmental issues. As such having more immigrants arriving in the UK is unlikely to raise overall global pollution or demand. ” The reply button seems to be missing from Luisa post. But I really don’t believe this. The population of most Eastern European countries is in decline as many people… Read more »

Stewart Blackmore
Reply to  Island Monkey
8, December 2016 2:25 pm

Your problem IM is that the government DOES have control over the sorts of immigration that Robert highlights above; It chooses not to control it because to do so would almost certainly result in chaos within the NHS and other organisations which absolutely rely upon it.

Island Monkey
Reply to  Stewart Blackmore
8, December 2016 2:52 pm

Stuart, are you already working together with Viix, Is this the future of the left on the island ?

By the way, I haven’t got a problem.

Vix Lowthion
Reply to  Island Monkey
8, December 2016 3:32 pm

By the way, it’s Stewart.

Island Monkey
Reply to  Vix Lowthion
8, December 2016 4:24 pm

Apologies to Stewart.

whenever whatever
Reply to  Stewart Blackmore
8, December 2016 8:15 pm

Stewart, your last 13 years of Labour government could have controlled immigration, instead it opened the flood gates and took control of nothing.

m coakley
8, December 2016 12:59 pm

the question Luisa wanted answering about net increase in births over deaths was 171,800 in 2015 which also gave the figure of immigration 335,600 during the same year a total of 574,000 increase in population. Incidentally to put the increase into some sort of prospective the population of the city of Newcastle upon Tyne is 299,000.

Luisa Hillard
Reply to  m coakley
8, December 2016 2:01 pm

Thank you for taking the time to research this. I’ve since had a chance to look and I note that non-EU migration (over which our government has full control) is higher than that from within the EU.

Caconym
Reply to  Luisa Hillard
8, December 2016 2:24 pm

By a factor of around two.

bigg market
8, December 2016 2:02 pm

I think it’s worth noting that over 50% of the net Immigration figures are of people from outside the EU. This is an area over which the Government does have control. So unless new criteria are established (and all EU citizens shut out) the figures will continue in terms of over 100,000 coming here. Incidentally we want to do a trade deal with India but that Government… Read more »

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined