see saw

Isle of Wight school funding: Analysis of who will gain or lose under NFF

The second stage of a consultation for a change to the national funding formula for schools was launched by the Secretary of State for Education, Justine Greening MP, yesterday (Wednesday).

The new national funding formula seeks to address the “unfairness in the current, outdated system” to ensure that small, rural schools are funded as equally as those in urban areas.

Underperforming areas will gain
Justine Greening says,

“Schools serving large numbers of pupils who live in areas of deprivation but who are not eligible for free school meals – those whose families are just about managing – will benefit from our proposals.

“Schools in areas of sustained educational underperformance will also gain.”

Although Isle of Wight schools have seen some great improvements in the last four years (from a time when many had been placed in Special Measures), the Island still ranks near the bottom of the league tables for attainment, so according to Ms Greening’s comment above, should see some promising funding gains.

Secondary schools the winners
The figures provided relate to six of the Island’s secondary schools; Sandown Bay, Ryde Academy, Medina College, Cowes Enterprise College, Carisbrooke College and Christ the King College.

The IOW Studio School and Island Free School are not included yet, as they are still considered ‘new schools and filling up’.

Looking across the six schools the average increase in funding would be 3.34% (£161,333pa).

The biggest increase would go to Sandown Bay Academy (the largest pupil numbers), which could see an increase of 4.12% (£214,000), whilst the lowest increase would go to Christ the King College with 2.4% (£135,000).

Many primary schools lose out
The picture is quite different for Isle of Wight primary schools though.

According to the preliminary illustrative figures presented by the DfE, the average change to funding is -0.39%, with four primary schools potentially losing over £30,000 of funding per annum.

Oakfield Primary in Ryde could lose -2.70% (-£37,000), with Lanesend (-£36k), St Francis (-£36k) and Gurnard (-£33k) primary schools all following close behind.

In percentage terms, the winners in the primary sector look to be Chillerton & Rookley with 5.88% increase (£19,000). However in terms of funding the largest increase goes to Barton Primary with an increase of £43,000 (4.61%).

It’s understood there may be some additional top-ups, but OnTheWight are seeking further clarification on that.

Image: harmishhk under CC BY 2.0

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
20 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Nitonia
16, December 2016 8:36 am

Waiting for the spin from the local Tories. This news is at best mixed. A number of schools though look set for more devastating cuts as a result of this governments complete disregard for our young people.

For God’s sake give them a chance and resource them properly.

steve stubbings
16, December 2016 8:44 am

Don’t worry, Nitonia, Cllr Whittaker, the local tories’ education spokesman is already on it.

sam salt
Reply to  steve stubbings
16, December 2016 9:29 am

Steve perhaps now that Cllr Whitehouse has been reported to the Monitoring Officer it might be better to not try and make witty comments. It isn’t becoming of a Senior Councillor. You don’t want to give Mr Whitehouse or his tory cronies any ammunition.
I am surprised that Dave Stewart, Ian Ward and Andrew Turner have not commented on the matter and distanced themselves from him.

steve stubbings
Reply to  sam salt
16, December 2016 9:31 am

A fair point, Marion. Thank you.

Colin
Reply to  steve stubbings
16, December 2016 9:45 am

In fairness Cllr Whitehouse has become a bit of an embarrassment. He removed himself from the fray some months ago citing personal reasons, but has recently resurfaced. Can we have some sort of clarification as to whether or not it is open season to take pot shots at his pronouncements however ludicrous or are we still to keep quiet?

Steve Goodman
Reply to  Colin
16, December 2016 10:13 am

If he cannot control himself, and his Con. colleagues cannot or will not restrain him, unless they are comfortable with his embarrassing episodes, why do they continue to allow him to remain as one of their group?.

Luisa Hillard
Reply to  Colin
16, December 2016 11:03 am

As Cllr Whitehouse issues press releases and makes public criticisms of others I would have to conclude that he is currently inviting scrutiny of his utterances.

Colin
16, December 2016 9:35 am

Good article from OTW. As ever, when you dig down into the actual figures from government, the reality tends not to match the headline. Whilst any improvement in funding is to be welcomed, it should be remembered that over the next couple of years the funding level remains fixed so in terms of spending power and allowing for minimal pay rises allowing for inflation, the value of… Read more »

tyke
16, December 2016 2:10 pm

Cllr Stubbings. Don’t you think the schools who are loosing a significant proportion of their budget could reasonably expect a more adult contribution to the debate from the deputy leader of the council. Your habitual snipes at (the admittedly odd and frequently unpleasant) Whitehouse are tiresome, facile and unbecoming given your office and the seriousness of the issue. Once again you seem too keen to sidestep serious… Read more »

steve stubbings
16, December 2016 2:17 pm

tyke
The problem is that he is NOT marginalised, he’s the ‘education spokesman’.
I happen to consider that fact to be a very serious issue indeed.
Thank you for your contribution towards keeping the conversation live.

tyke
16, December 2016 2:28 pm

Councillor Whitehouse is, with justification I’ll admit, probably the most vilified person on this site. He is as marginalised in these parts as it’s possible to be and what you are doing here is merely, and clearly, playing to the audience. If you think that is your role as deputy leader then fine but I am sure the schools affected – and anyone else looking on dispassionately… Read more »

steve stubbings
16, December 2016 2:51 pm

Councillor Whitehouse, the education spokesman for the tory group in council, posted libellous comments about a fellow councillor on this site under somebody else’s name. In doing so, he caused several people considerable distress. He then gave various different explanations for his mistake/actions, none of which appear to correspond with one another. Councillor Whitehouse has been given ample opportunity to clarify the situation, here and elsewhere, but,… Read more »

tyke
16, December 2016 3:02 pm

Unfortunately I, along with pretty much the entire Isle of Wight electorate, was not at last night’s meeting. I guess your views on this important subject will have to remain a mystery to all but a handful of people who were. That’s accountability Indy style, is it? Still, many thanks for yet more unsolicited views on your bete noire Chris Whitehouse. Fascinating stuff which will be of… Read more »

steve stubbings
16, December 2016 3:12 pm

Councillor Bacon will, as the relevant Executive member, be releasing a written response to this announcement in due course. My apologies for assuming that you would have understood this to be the normal course of events.
All the best to you. I need to get back to work!

tyke
16, December 2016 3:27 pm

I will wait with interest for Cllr Bacon’s statement. Is he waiting for another resignation/criminal act before he releases it or will it be done in the appropriate fashion this time?
No need to reply if you are busy working, Steve. I’ve heard enough about Cllr Whitehouse for one day in any case.

wightlad
Reply to  tyke
16, December 2016 3:55 pm

Tyke, personally I’m torn on this issue. I want to hear what Cllr Bacon has to say, but I don’t think we should ignore Cllr Whitehouse’s contribution to the debate. He, after all, does seek to directly lobby the government on Isle of Wight issues – and seemingly with no mandate. Nevertheless, it does appear that Stevie has a negative obsession with Whitehouse to a degree which… Read more »

steve stubbings
Reply to  wightlad
17, December 2016 9:21 am

I’ve always been baffled by this tendency to expect different behaviour from somebody ‘in my position’ than we expect from ourselves. Surely we should all behave in a reasonable manner towards one another, shouldn’t we? Just because you blog anonymously doesn’t mean you can operate under a different set of standards. How often we fail to see the plank in our own eye. Btw. No negative obsession… Read more »

Luisa Hillard
16, December 2016 3:49 pm

The problem with cuts to primary school funding is that the deficit seems to be met by parents, though endless fundraising. I think that’s an issue in areas where there are families struggling to make ends meet.

It might also make schools function like businesses, rather than social enterprises supporting the community.

Island Monkey
16, December 2016 4:37 pm

Always the left wing view eh Luisa.

Why not stand as a Green next May, let your electors know where you stand? Maybe Steve will stand for Labour, you can create a formal alliance, assuming you get back in of course.

retired hack
Reply to  Island Monkey
16, December 2016 5:30 pm

If we’re talking formulaic predictability, IM, then I do urge you not to throw stones in your rather fragile owner-occupied greenhouse.
Which brings me neatly back to CW (thanks for reminding me). He’s been dishing it out incessantly for a good while now. A little schadenfreude is an understandable reaction to what’s going on at the moment.

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined