Live reporting

Live reporting: Members decide future of Local Area Coordinators and more

OnTheWight will be reporting live (see below) from the Isle of Wight Cabinet meeting tonight (from 5pm).

Taking place at the Westridge Centre in Ryde, the meeting will cover a number of items on the agenda (see below).

Live updates
The live updates that appear below will automatically refresh in the page. Items in double brackets (()) indicate comment from the author.

If you value our live reporting and want to support trustworthy, independently-owned Isle of Wight media, here’s how you can join a growing number of readers who understand that the traditional model of journalism is changing.

Nov 08, 16:55
Busy meeting
There are around 30-40 members of the public here

Nov 08, 17:02
Leader opens meeting
Suggests phones and ipad, in case you accidentally look at something you shouldn’t, be turned off or set to silent

Nov 08, 17:03
Cabinet members asked to introduce themselves.
They introduce themselves one by one explaining what their portfolios are.

Nov 08, 17:09
Public questions
Tanja Rebel asks question about 5g coverage on the Island. Cllr Hobart says they are awaiting an impact assessment.

Nov 08, 17:12
Questions
Written reply will be sent to Sue Birch about transport. Written reply to Mr Mills.

Question about beach huts -Mrs Gasgoine – how can they justify large increase charges and where did they do comparisons with?

Cllr Hutchinson – open market value based on size and position and not part of statutory duties but part of commercial estate. Explains how charges are considered. Compared to south coast. vat applicable to all rentals.

Nov 08, 17:14
Questions
Lynne Rinaldi – delegated decision beach huts. Asking where figure for sale of beach hut sold for £30,000 came from as foi request said not allowable .
Cllr Hutchinson says figure came from one of the beach hut owners who took part in the review. 11 huts have been sold for various prices.
Questioner says the reply is like hearsay.

Nov 08, 17:16
Questions
Michael Ward – shared ownership – not on register. How can you develop for new build going forward.
Cllr Abraham – appraisal of info for setting up revenue account and registration detailed in the report.
Mr Ward – people trying to sell shared ownership properties and not able to because IWC not on register.
Cllr Abraham says they will be setting up.

Nov 08, 17:20
More questions
Rebecca ? – beach huts- what arrangements for another sudden price rose to not go ahead. Can’t rent out without extra insurance cost.

Cllr Hutchinson – not sure sudden increase as phased over five years after giving one year notice. Not current intention for further rent reviews but can’t say what things will be like in ten years time. Cost of legal fees for renewal licence.
He carries on that for long time huts have been exceptionally cheap for some time. There will be a formula freeze at end of second year to consider any unexpected changes that might arise from the new policy.

Nov 08, 17:22
Hazel Brittan – questonnaboht local area coordinators. Live well can only offer six sessions.
Cllr Mosdell – license through network – living well comes together to support those with needs. ((Galloping through her answer so difficult oshe keep up))
Supplementary – 2-3 backlog so how will you expand.
Cllr Mosdell – A spent four hours working on how there will be no back log.

Nov 08, 17:23
Q- why no public consultation to remove LAC support?
Mosdell – no statutory requirement to consult. We have checked with legal.

Nov 08, 17:25
Last question
Malcolm Marshall – given AEW’s actions over. Ryde arena – what legal action will IWC taken or what has been taken
Cllr Whittle – continues to press for building to be given back for public use . IWC frustrates. Could prejudice IWC to say anymore at this time.

Nov 08, 17:28
Diana Conyers – LACs paper says provision made to support necessary – how will this cost? 600 people many require long term support. Are cabinet aware lacs have workload of 60 people each. How many others in services have that case load?
Cllr Mosdell – yes aware of how many they are working with. New recommendations to cabinet – have a transition fund. Will ensure all those will be signposted in the right direction.

Nov 08, 17:29
Heath Monaghan – LACs – deal with vulnerable people and very impressed with LACs and unhappy partner services have not been consulted. Will result in more suicide deaths and isolation. Can cabinet be sensible and pause the decision for six to twelve lengths and work with voluntary sectors to safeguard those most in need? ((Round of applause))

Nov 08, 17:31
Mark Cheverton – unison – in view of concerns expressed would it not be sensible to defer decision until wide ranging review of the issues. And would protect the reputation of the IWC.
Same answer as before. Five months until decision will ‘fall through’

Nov 08, 17:32
Cllr Heather White from Freshwater – understand IWC never intended to pay for LAC indefinitely so why didn’t they seek funding before proposing to axe the service.
Cllr Mosdell says will be answered when she gives proposal to cabinet.

Nov 08, 17:34
Zoe Thompson – ryde business association refers to strategy report item consider free on street parking. Asks why IWC feel there isn’t comprehensive evidence for free parking.
Leader – will be covered in discussion in budget.
Need to save £5.5m.

Nov 08, 17:35
Cameron Palin – who owns floating bridge has extended warranty kicked in yet and will IWC get money back?
leader IWC has not taken formal ownership of the bridge but we do maintain it. Have used the warranty when
Number of people paid money. £1m IWC £3.7m Slep and extra costs. Will come in when legal discussions.

Nov 08, 17:40
Catherine Pugh – resident of Ryde and so concerned why so many large scale housing development by allows in Ryde. Infrastructure can’t cope.
Cllr Abraham – applications like penny feathers approved before they were in power and can’t comment or change that. Review of the island plan. Have land supply come forward from land owners. Consultation at end of this month. Government numbers expecting us to deliver 641 houses per year. Probably will never be achieved.
Supplementary – affordable housing should be there.

Nov 08, 17:51
Last question
Mrs Penny Tilt. Volunteer- given all services looking after vulnerable people already overstretched what will happen in next five months for other people find themselves in that position.
Cllr Mosdell says this will be answered when she presents to paper.
((Get the feeling that something very different is going to proposed))

Nov 08, 17:43
Chairman’s announcements
Wrote to parliamentary undersecretary about the clean air zone. Reply was that Local authorities need to consider plans and they must not cause impact to businesses and individuals.
Met with Leader of Southampton and going to work together on this and tourism offer.

Nov 08, 17:44
Digital conference
Taking place next week. Over 150 attendees. Will be showcasing AI.

Nov 08, 17:44
Remembrance service
At Newport Minster on Sunday morning.

Nov 08, 17:45
House of Lords
CEO went to select committee on coastal communities

Nov 08, 17:50
Budget
Leader to read a budget – will take 5-6 mins
Earliest draft budget for many years
Start to address lack of affordable housing
In stronger financial position
Government will not bail us out if we run out of money – refers to Northamptonshire
Have put some money away – £11m in reserves
Manage the risk to develop budget. Using reserves is unsustainable.
Budget decisions are not easy. All want to invest in communities but have to be realists
Believe we should receive more money because we are an island and have extra cost.
Spending £140m providing essential community.
We do a good job
Being clever with money we have
Publishing early allows all island make suggestions
Will consider all observations
We must save £5.5m and following two years after that
Can only use reserves once.
Work in progress proposals
Know some decisions do not sit comfortably with some cabinet members

Nov 08, 17:52
Leader chastises those who criticise the proposals without constructive comments.

Nov 08, 17:58
Deputy leader
Over last six years have had to save £76m. All easy cuts have gone.
On track to delivery this year’s savings.
Got to save £16.5m additional savings including next two years.
Refers to other councils that have had problems with budgets. Northamptonshire and at least three others.
Exposed potentially difficult decisions to make £5.5m savings. Look for efficiencies in way we work. Purchasing instead of leasing vehicles. Re-engineering services such as alcohol and drug service.
Additional income. £100,000 if borrowing to invest. Every £1 we earn is another £1 we don’t have to save.
Bids to government for funding – successful with funding for items such as Newport road reorganisation
Toilets etc picked up by town and parish council.
Stopping a service is a last resort. May have to look at stopping some services in next budget or ones after
Portsmouth university study found being an island cost £6.4m more to provide services.
Fair funding review – arguing strongly for more money due to our position of having 50% more older people than many other local authorities.

Nov 08, 18:00
Leader
Explains process for budget savings. Percentage of budget for each portfolio.
What’s in paper is outcome of that.
Cllr Outlaw very good with figures so going to keep a note of all suggestion of changes.

Nov 08, 18:01
Cllr Mosdell
Appendix B line 11 – increase in wight care charges. Wants serious consideration by cabinet. Will bring in £17,000 – would be false economy.

Nov 08, 18:02
Cllr Abraham
Agreed with Cllr Mosdell / speaking to older residents and have been surprised how many don’t know about Wight Care. Should market it better.

Nov 08, 18:05
Cllr Ward
Comment on Ryde parking charges. Item 34 the comment is deliberately not specific.
Cllr whittle says the proposal doesn’t support small business support. Problem with union street is split into four zones and many who work in shops move from one hour to another. Male union street one zone and everyone gets free hour and much fairer and good for customers. Saving was £74,500.

Nov 08, 18:05
Cllr Mosdell
Same goes for Crocker Street – add to list £?

Nov 08, 18:06
Cllr Murwill
Looked at opening hours of tip – should consider removing the earlier closing from budget.

Nov 08, 18:08
Cllr Brading
Children’s services / struggled to come up with savings. Wants to remove line 16 from the proposals – island futures £50,000 – got some funding to replace it. A-level results need improving. Three stage approach to improve. Spend the £50,000 on a level work rather than cut from budget.

Nov 08, 18:09
Cllr Mosdell about parking
Lines 36/7 I believe there is a typo in there, when Ian was explaining to me regarding on street charging?
Cllr Ward said that’s a line item we need to look at a bit more closely and make sure it’s targeted efficiently.
If we could consider that at this stage – of removing that – we may be able to adjust it.
Leader – Can you explain a little bit what you mean what you mean by the typo error.
Cllr Ward – It was offstreet parking – the other way round
Leader – This should have referred to offstreet parking, we’re not intending to in this budget paper at the moment to charge for on street parking overnight?
Cllr Ward – That’s right.

Senior finance officers do not intervene or correct Cllr Ward.

Nov 08, 18:10
Cllr Abraham
Buying vehicles outright. Can we buy through county network?
Cllr Hutchinson says yes. Can buy new vans for £6k.

Nov 08, 18:13
Cllr Brading
Item 38 – sea front parking all year round needs to be looked at.

Nov 08, 18:13
Cllr Outlaw
£312,000 savings noted during that discussion that Cllrs want removed.

Nov 08, 18:14
Cllr Hutchinson
We have to save £5.5m

Nov 08, 18:17
Leader reads out the recommendations from the paper including 2.99% council tax increase as well as other savings/cuts/efficiencies

Cllr Whittle seconds the recommendations – all members vote in favour

Nov 08, 18:23
Item 6
Cllr Mosdell on LACs / new recommendations. Reiterate believes in early intervention and has immediate problem to face with budget. Started to address issues with LGA peer review. Asked Hampshire to take over a public Health. Had to tender some services. Full LAC service would cost £500,000+. Can’t delay for a year. Cannot and will not have unsafe services. Refers to Sian Lockwood claims of £500,000 savings per LAC each year ((wrong – Sian said over three years not each year))
Set up task and finish group review.
Certain areas have had greatest benefit such as West Wight.
Cabinet agrees investment into Ryde and Freshwater. ‘Community builder’ will be put into these areas. Areas of high concern when LACs ceases will be covered.

Nov 08, 18:24
New proposal – ceases LAC by March 31 2019
Signposting to services
No new referrals from date of decision.
Task and finish group to review work of LAC and similar programmes.

Nov 08, 18:26
Cllr Hutchinson says if decide to cease service in current form there is always a cost to change and would provide transition budget of up to £100,000 to help.

Nov 08, 18:29
Cllr Abraham
Invested money in reconfiguring facilities at county hall.
Cllr Mosdell – not wasting money returning county hall. Isle help and CAB will be there. To provide hub of services.
Cllr Hutchinson – clarifies total cost over £200,000 one off cost. Ongoing revenue savings. Scheme will pay for itself.

Nov 08, 18:31
Cllr Abraham
LAC doesn’t cover whole island so whatever proposal to replace should be whole island.
Cllr Mosdell / part of recommendations report into local care board and work already started in early intervention.

Nov 08, 18:33
Cllr Murwill
Surplus food distribution – been in contact with businesses, Aspire etc. Great to have hubs across the island, east centre and west.
Would be worth investing in west Wight community and sports centre.

Nov 08, 18:41
The vote
All vote in favour of the recommendations- most residents leave the meeting.

Nov 08, 18:50
((Had to leave the meeting for a moment))

Nov 08, 18:50
CEO talking about one public service.

Updated: Nov 08, 18:51
The vote
Recommend options A and B re sustainability and transformation partnership- integrated care system. Seconded by leader and recommended by Cllr Mosdell
Vote: all in favour

Nov 08, 18:55
Paper F
Cllr Abraham introduces the paper. Going back to the past. 30 years ago on Medina Borough Council passed move towards housing associations.
Current market does not deliver enough affordable housing or sheltered housing.
IWC should take a more active role with affordable housing.
Through use of special purchase vehicles.
IWC to consider whether to introduce housing revenue xxx
Have to start to deliver. Can’t see any other way.
Housing needs assessment in para 6
Average wage £25,000 and average house £215,000 – out of the reach of young people.

Nov 08, 19:06
Should be able to offer better than we do. Move to recommendations as stated in paper F.
Seconded by Cllr outlaw. Led task and finish group last year to look at delivery of affordable housing with Cllrs Lilley, Andre and Quirk.
Important piece of work and pleased to see this coming forward. Grateful to prime minister and lifting cap on housing revenue account.
Cllr Whittle – very much needed. One and two bedroom houses not being built. Need to move market around.
Cllr Brading / opportunity to develop apprenticeships.
Cllr Mosdell / supported living for people with learning disabilities, long term premises.
Leader says it will shake things up. Not just talking about it, we’re going to do it.
Vote: all in favour

Nov 08, 19:08
Item 10
Brief updates on portfolios
Cllr Whittle – regeneration team submitting plan to government for garden communities schemes.
Proposed development sites in newport harbour and former Camp Hill.
Entry into programme opens doors to funding – expect to hear by April 2019.

Nov 08, 19:09
Forward plan
Cllr Outlaw points to paper licensing of boatmen (?) from December to January

Nov 08, 19:11
Item 14 – paper G
Press and public exclusion being discussed.
CEO says discussion can happen so long as anything mentioned in confidential papers are not spoken about

Nov 08, 19:16
Pan development
Cllr Hutchinson says paper is self explanatory. Been going on for substantial amount of time and need to wrap up. Set out in recommendations in para 37/38.
CEO adds comments / way reported in media doesn’t set out full details
Barretts agreed £4.7m 8 years ago for when site finished.
Try to move to pick up on desire for affordable housing – make the most of £4.7m available
Beacause of way Pan Manco was set up this gives a way for us to protect manco for future. Ties up everything nicely in one bundle to look after everyone on estate. Lends to a positive story.
Cllr Outlaw grateful to CEO and assistant CEO to reinforce option one delivering best value for the council delivering homes for those in need.
Leader reads out recommendations

The Agenda
Click on the full screen icon to see larger version and click through to the individual papers.

Cabinet agenda by OnTheWightNews on Scribd

Image: sskennel under CC BY 2.0

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
0 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
VentnorLad
19, October 2016 5:10 pm

Any Councillors absent?

Sally Perry
Reply to  VentnorLad
19, October 2016 8:09 pm

Apologies accepted for Cllrs Smart, Hollis, Nicholson and Perks.

VentnorLad
19, October 2016 6:04 pm

1802: Chris Whitehorse (sic) abstained.

Isn’t that Mr Perks’ normal role?

Sally Perry
Reply to  VentnorLad
19, October 2016 7:22 pm

He’s absent today.

VentnorLad
Reply to  Sally Perry
19, October 2016 7:45 pm

So he missed the July Full Council, the October Scrutiny Committee and hasn’t updated his “annual” report since May 2015?

One might begin to draw the conclusion that the Councillor for Ventnor East can’t really be bothered.

retired hack
19, October 2016 7:17 pm

Cllr Stewart: “There will be strings attached to this – the government doesn’t just give money away.”
Not at all like the Highways PFI, then…

Yawn 666
19, October 2016 7:41 pm

Spooky, is it Halloween yet? This meeting sounds exactly as described by Charlotte H in last weeks local paper.

nico
19, October 2016 8:03 pm

I wonder how many who voted against the Deal turned up for in-depth briefings beforehand, and didn’t just vote on an uninformed whim on the night.

Geoff Lumley
Reply to  nico
19, October 2016 11:15 pm

I can assure you Cllr Bob Seely was never there. He is too busy writing something about warfare (see story elsewhere)……

VentnorLad
19, October 2016 9:05 pm

Absolutely flabbergasted that three Councillors voted against a road safety motion with a clear evidence base to save lives.

Who are these people and how can they possibly justify such an irresponsible move?

okayanyway
Reply to  VentnorLad
19, October 2016 9:43 pm

Absolutely, can we have them named?? and who abstained.

Geoff Lumley
Reply to  okayanyway
19, October 2016 11:07 pm

Ward (Con), Kendall (IW Indy), Jordan (IW Indy)

Nitonia
Reply to  Sally Perry
20, October 2016 8:10 am

If Cllr Stephens cannot be bothered to express an opinion on serious issues by voting then he should resign immediately. Absolute disgrace.

phil jordan
Reply to  Nitonia
20, October 2016 9:47 am

Nitonia:

…would you extend that same call to Cllr Whitehouse who, earlier in the evening, also failed to express an opinion whatsoever on the medium term budget strategy (now THAT is a serious issue) and subsequently abstained ?

VentnorLad
Reply to  Nitonia
20, October 2016 9:51 am

Does anybody still take Mr Whitehouse seriously?

Isn’t he just the very loosest of cannon?

An embarrassment not only to himself and his party, but also to the council and our Island.

Luisa Hillard
Reply to  Nitonia
20, October 2016 10:54 am

Sometimes we are torn on a decision and really don’t want to vote either for or against. Whilst some councillors will make a habit of abstaining, or even not voting at all (to avoid any negative press perhaps!) most usually do vote one way or the other. I think it would be dangerous to remove the ability to abstain and force decisions which councillors are no comfortable… Read more »

Luisa Hillard
Reply to  VentnorLad
19, October 2016 10:07 pm

The motion has serious issues that made it rather pointless beyond a political statement. Very worrying when one Councillor asked if we can just change the 30mph signs to 20mph signs as they get renewed. There is no understanding of policy and legal requirements. In reality it is a decision for the Executive as there are likely to be fairly hefty budget implications. Not a cheap process… Read more »

Matt Price
Reply to  Luisa Hillard
19, October 2016 11:33 pm

There is every understanding of policy Luisa, I for one am a qualified accident assessor and have far more understanding of road safety and highway related regulations than you may think. YOU and your colleagues shouting over me while I was talking (or trying to) was entirely out of order. I don’t interrupt you do I? Why would it be such a stupid question to ask the… Read more »

Luisa Hillard
Reply to  Luisa Hillard
20, October 2016 10:50 am

I wasn’t going to name and shame but as you’ve chosen to identify yourself, so be it. Your very question demonstrated that you have no clue about council policy or procedure regarding this issue and I am concerned that this should be the case after 3.5 years as a Councillor. How can we expect residents to understand if their elected representatives think that it’s as simple as… Read more »

Matt Price
Reply to  Luisa Hillard
20, October 2016 12:12 pm

You and your colleagues were the embarrassment last night Luisa, your shouting across the chamber, and unruly behaviour is a disgrace. I have always treated every one of you with respect and have worked with all of you and frankly was taken aback at being spoken over by you all. I am not ashamed to represent my residents and by asking the questions they have asked of… Read more »

Luisa Hillard
Reply to  VentnorLad
20, October 2016 11:00 am

As I’ve said elsewhere the motion has issues and what is required is a paper going to Executive which sets out the huge costs and resource implications of this decision. Phil Jordan tried to explain – as the Executive member he understands the issues better than any other Councillor – but he didn’t really get the chance to provide the points of information that were needed. We… Read more »

VentnorLad
Reply to  Luisa Hillard
20, October 2016 11:15 am

You seem to be confusing 20mph zones and 20mph limits. Or at least using the terms interchangeably.

The link I posted yesterday morning explains the difference.

When you criticise others for a poor understanding of the issues, wouldn’t it be wise to be clear about them yourself?

VentnorLad
Reply to  VentnorLad
20, October 2016 11:16 am

The link I alluded to (posted at 1001 yesterday) is still awaiting moderation!

Here it is again:

http://www.rospa.com/road-safety/advice/drivers/speed/20mph-zones-and-limits/

Luisa Hillard
Reply to  VentnorLad
20, October 2016 11:20 am

Legally they are the same. So yes, I’m using interchangeably because they are enforced the same.

Based on cost I would expect limits to be introduced, rather than zones. However, zones would reduce the incidence (and requirement to monitor) speeding. They also inconvenience emergency vehicles.

VentnorLad
Reply to  Luisa Hillard
20, October 2016 11:36 am

You seem to be implying that as they need external enforcement that speed limits are ineffective in curtailing dangerous driving. As such, if saving lives and reducing injuries is the purpose of such changes, shouldn’t we be advocating the use of zones instead? How much is too much to spend on them if we save even one life? As for inconveniencing emergency vehicles, aren’t the emergency services… Read more »

Luisa Hillard
Reply to  Luisa Hillard
20, October 2016 10:15 pm

DaveIOW a potential lack of enforcement is what my residents have expressed as a concern for the effectiveness of any changes. Certainly not all are even in favour of speed restrictions. I can see the benefit of dense residential areas with terraced houses and on-street parking becoming zones, although as I say I would be concerned about access for emergency vehicles and the effect on patients experiencing… Read more »

Mat
19, October 2016 9:28 pm

Southampton voted for Solent Devolution.

adrian whittaker
Reply to  Mat
19, October 2016 9:36 pm

of course they would the only available space to build the required nuber of housing would be the isle of wight Portsmouth ans Southampton are full

Mat
Reply to  adrian whittaker
19, October 2016 9:45 pm

Just the messenger.

Stewart Blackmore
19, October 2016 10:30 pm

Surely it’s untenable that a senior member of the Executive and a former leader (and still member of the executive) should abstain on a vote on a motion which the leader of the council has put his name to and on which he (the leader) led the debate? There are only two options here. Either Councillor Stephens has to resign or Councillor Bacon has to dismiss him.… Read more »

caulkhead
Reply to  Stewart Blackmore
19, October 2016 10:46 pm

True Islander.

caulkhead
Reply to  Stewart Blackmore
19, October 2016 10:53 pm

Ian Stephens,knows about the Solent LEP.

Stewart Blackmore
Reply to  caulkhead
19, October 2016 10:56 pm

I believe he’s still on it.

caulkhead
Reply to  Stewart Blackmore
19, October 2016 11:05 pm

Ian Stephens,is not on the LEP Board Cllr Bacon is.

Stewart Blackmore
Reply to  caulkhead
19, October 2016 11:20 pm

I’ve checked, and Councillor Bacon has replaced him. Apologies.

Caulkhead
Reply to  caulkhead
20, October 2016 4:52 am

Also,on the Solent LEP Board are the Council Leaders of Portsmouth and Southampton.

Geoff Lumley
Reply to  Stewart Blackmore
19, October 2016 11:11 pm

I have to agree Stewart. The Labour councillors supported this reluctantly after our No Mayor amendment was defeated. But Cllr Bacon could not even deliver his own group. So much for ‘independents’…….

Mo
Reply to  Geoff Lumley
19, October 2016 11:19 pm

Nice to see you are talking to the VM now.

Luisa Hillard
Reply to  Geoff Lumley
20, October 2016 11:03 am

independent is the operative word. We vote as individuals without a whip, although usually it’s easy to reach a consensus.

Julia Baker-Smith
Reply to  Stewart Blackmore
20, October 2016 12:59 am

We work by consensus, and accept there will always be times when people will need to vote otherwise or abstain based on commitments they have previously made or pure matters of conscience. There is no whip therefore how could Cllr Stephens be removed? Ian’s abstention is a matter for him as an Independent member. What is more concerning is the obvious 3 line whip that appears to… Read more »

tyke
19, October 2016 10:37 pm

A terrible embarrassment for the leadership. Not only did they fail to sell this idea to the public it seems from your coverage (thanks Sal) that there were plenty of senior Independents who, though they voted in favour, failed to speak in support of the plans. This silence is telling: almost as though Independents were half heartedly following a whip. Which, of course they wouldn’t be because,… Read more »

phil jordan
Reply to  tyke
20, October 2016 9:42 am

tyke:

that’s right tyke….no whip or political party….which is why we had members abstaining….!

On the other hand, not only did the conservative group vote in a whipped manner but their unholy alliance with IMG also ensured that they also acted in a whipped manner.

This type of political grouping does not serve our Island well at all….

tyke
Reply to  phil jordan
20, October 2016 11:53 am

Of course the Tories voted together: they are a political party and make no bones about it. Are we seriously expected to believe that the Indies all made up their own minds – to a man and woman – not to vote against the proposals? The abstentions signal to me that they were against the plans but could not bring themselves to vote that way. I wonder… Read more »

Luisa Hillard
Reply to  tyke
20, October 2016 11:10 am

I’m skeptical of what Devolution can offer. Mostly because I don’t trust the government and their motives, which is to reduce the deficit. I’m not strongly in favour but if the government says it’s the only way that we will get additional funding then I’m going to support negotiations until a final deal is put on the table so that I can make a fully informed decision.… Read more »

Ali Hayden.
20, October 2016 12:01 am

It was refreshing to see that most who voted no to the Combined Authority did so taking on the views of those who elected them. Speaking their mind on the very valid reasons for voting no. The consultation yielded a very poor response rate with many comments that were echoed this evening by Councillors. The public meeting was also very poorly attended with similar questions + fears… Read more »

Rod Manley
20, October 2016 1:07 am

Well that’s that out of the way, so let’s hold our heads up and get on with the business of sorting our own problems out.

nico
Reply to  Rod Manley
20, October 2016 6:05 am

Who needs money anyway. We can stumble along …. and become more vulnerable than ever to outside forces.

VentnorLad
Reply to  nico
20, October 2016 11:48 am

A delightfully sinister turn of phrase!

Which “outside forces” are you worried about?

Does the People’s Republic of Dorset have malign intent? Are they drawing up invasion plans as we sit here wallowing in complacency that the Solent is acting as our moat?

Luisa Hillard
Reply to  Rod Manley
20, October 2016 11:12 am

We are not capable as an Island of ‘sorting out our own problems’ when the issue is not enough money to pay for statutory services. The government continues to cut our funding with the intention of cutting it completely. Without devoted powers we cannot increase our income to even attempt to bridge the gap.

Caconym
20, October 2016 8:13 am

***”A huge kerfuffle breaks then out after Cllr Price asks why Island Roads can’t just change the 30mph for 20mph signs when they are renewed.”***

So, that’s confirmed then.

Intelligence and common sense are not high on the list of requirements for a Councillor.

VentnorLad
Reply to  Caconym
20, October 2016 9:02 am

Confirmed?

I hadn’t realised there was any doubt!

Luisa Hillard
Reply to  Caconym
20, October 2016 11:14 am

There is more information on his naive question on another article.

Luisa Hillard
Reply to  Luisa Hillard
20, October 2016 11:15 am

*thread. Further up.

Matt Price
Reply to  Luisa Hillard
20, October 2016 12:31 pm

Nothing naïve about the question which was simply put: ‘could the signage element not be looked at within the island roads contract??’ Of course the answer is yes, but then the ‘kerfuffle’ is typical of the independents when asked to use common sense, so Luisa stop trying to belittle me which frankly I don’t give a damn if you try. Representing island people is what I always… Read more »

Luisa Hillard
Reply to  Matt Price
20, October 2016 10:06 pm

That was not the question asked which was of concern. The real question has been quoted several times and not just by me.

Jonathan Bacon
Reply to  Luisa Hillard
20, October 2016 10:48 pm

Of course if you are creating the basis for someone to be convicted of a criminal offence then there is rather more to it than just changing a sign!

Matt Price
Reply to  Luisa Hillard
21, October 2016 12:48 am

Crickey Jonathan, I cannot believe you are joining in this ridiculous debate about the signage, and also please don’t patronise me, I may sound stupid but be assured I am far from it. I asked whether the executive member had discussed the signage issue with Island roads! Not whether it could go ahead without appropriate consultation or changes to policy or without the required legalities! It was… Read more »

Luisa Hillard
Reply to  Luisa Hillard
21, October 2016 8:18 am

Matt Price seems not to recall his own question. I think that a transcript of the meeting is required. However, my recollection is this (as has been stated by myself and others):

“Why can’t Island Roads just change the signs from a 30mph to a 20mph?”

It is that question which is causing the issue.

nico
Reply to  Luisa Hillard
21, October 2016 8:19 am

*I* can believe Jonathan is joining in this debate about signage.

However ‘ridiculous’ Matt Price thinks it is, Jonathan (and other Exec members) are very good at ensuring we have access to the facts here, and keep on the rails of reality.

We also get a good idea of the characters of councillors when they post on here, which is useful.

Matt Price
Reply to  Luisa Hillard
21, October 2016 8:36 am

You only hear what you want to hear Luisa so whatever was said is irrelevant (and as I have said, and it was witnessed by all,), the noise that erupted from your side of the chamber prevented me finishing what I had to say. So read above if you want to understand where that attempt was leading. I see this as a convenient distraction by you and… Read more »

VentnorLad
Reply to  Luisa Hillard
21, October 2016 9:12 am

Luisa & Matt, Are you both proud of the way you’ve conducted yourself in this public disagreement? Is this conduct what you would have expected of yourselves? Is it in line with Nolan principles? Do you think the people you were elected to represent will see it as: a. A reassuring sign of the passion you have for the role that you are willing to disagree so… Read more »

phil jordan
Reply to  Luisa Hillard
21, October 2016 10:51 am

Matt: Just to (finally!) answer your query. We have and continue to discuss the issue of signage with IR. For clarity, signage is a ‘sub’ division of the contract with specific conditions and contractual obligations held within the overall contract. For example, there is written into the contract a *de-cluttering* policy which is being followed. Any removal of signs (on the basis that they can safely be… Read more »

nico
Reply to  Luisa Hillard
21, October 2016 1:36 pm

I posted a comment in the above strand about 5hrs ago, at 08.19.

*I* can see it, of course, but it’s not appeared on Latest Comments, and due to the finite length of the LC list, I now won’t be able to tell if it appears there or not, (as it would slot into the no-longer-in-sight time slot).

I presume it accidentally went into moderation.

nico
Reply to  Luisa Hillard
21, October 2016 1:51 pm

I have no quarrel with Luisa’s contribution, Daveiow.

Phil’s comment is quite an eye opener as to how the current Chair, unreasonably kept in post by the Tories for a second year, has yet again hampered Council, and thus Island, business.

Luisa Hillard
Reply to  Luisa Hillard
21, October 2016 4:42 pm

DaveIOW, I did not make my criticism of his comments personal. I did not even name him. Cllr Price chose to identify himself and try to turn it into what he describes as a ‘spat’… which all seems to be based on him having no recollection of making the comments which myself and others have issue with.

bones
20, October 2016 9:25 am

We have offered to pay for and maintain a 20mph sign here. Offer refused ( Health and Safety )
We have never seen IR maintaining the current 30mph signs.

Luisa Hillard
Reply to  bones
20, October 2016 11:23 am

It’s not the cost of the sign which is the issue. It’s the lengthy legal process that has to be followed in order to change it.

Matt Price
Reply to  Luisa Hillard
20, October 2016 12:33 pm

The question was about the signage only, although was shouted over,

why do you not listen????

tr
Reply to  Luisa Hillard
20, October 2016 1:30 pm

‘lengthy legal process’ Luisa?

I thought the IWC had no problem taking those on – aka the pursuit of ‘the clarity required’ following the actions of Jon Platt.

phil jordan
Reply to  tr
21, October 2016 10:22 am

tr:

No connection. A *better* phrase might have been ‘ a lengthy legislative process’ …but I think we probably all know what was intended by the comment.

Old Knobby
Reply to  Luisa Hillard
20, October 2016 9:34 pm

The question is, why is there a lengthy legal process? Is it just a council process and the way it’s always been done, so could be changed? Is it something enforced on us by the government? Or is it another unfortunate consequence of the PFI contract that the previous administration left us with?

VentnorLad
Reply to  Old Knobby
20, October 2016 9:54 pm

It doesn’t seem from this document to be terribly difficult to lower a 30mph limit to 20mph:

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/63975/circular-01-2013.pdf

Philip Hawkins
Reply to  VentnorLad
21, October 2016 7:18 am

Thanks for that link DaveIOW – it looks a very interesting document.

Luisa Hillard
Reply to  Old Knobby
20, October 2016 10:21 pm

Part of the problem is that the Council no longer has a Highways department. The Conservatives passed this over to Island Roads and got rid of all our in-house staff. Which means we can do nothing without the co-operation of Island Roads and they charge for every new change. The legal process is that of a Traffic Regulation Order and I’ve dealt with several of these in… Read more »

VentnorLad
Reply to  Luisa Hillard
20, October 2016 10:40 pm

That’s absolutely fine then, Luisa.

If it’s too difficult or time consuming it’s entirely unreasonable of the electorate to expect those who volunteered to become Councillors to bother with it.

I’m sure there’s much more important stuff you could be doing. Stuff that’s popular with voters.

Luisa Hillard
Reply to  Luisa Hillard
20, October 2016 11:08 pm

I have not suggested an unwillingness to undertake the task. I voted in favour. What I have said is that a decision will have to be taken regarding the best use of the available staff and money. There is a difference. And we are in a situation of not having enough of either to fulfil our basic requirements, let alone a wish list. If the choice is… Read more »

phil jordan
Reply to  Old Knobby
21, October 2016 10:18 am

Old Knobby:

It’s Government Legislation.

The Local Authorities Traffic Orders (Procedure) (England)
Regulations 2012.

The Road Traffic (Temporary Provisions) (Procedure) Amendment –
England) Regulations 2012.

The Secretary of State’s Traffic Orders (Procedure) (England and
Wales (Amendment England) Regulations 2012.

Nitonia
20, October 2016 10:02 am

“Nitonia:

…would you extend that same call to Cllr Whitehouse who, earlier in the evening, also failed to express an opinion whatsoever on the medium term budget strategy (now THAT is a serious issue) and subsequently abstained ?”

That’s a really good question Cllr Jordan to which the answer is absolutely!

tiki
20, October 2016 3:28 pm

Luisa Hillard has a point. The legal process in order to introduce these changes will surely be lengthy and expensive, one assumes surveys will need to be undertaken etc? I believe Cllr Peacey Wilcox has been trying for years to get a Stop Sign erected at a black spot in Cowes (think it’s Mill Hill Rd?) without any success despite numerous accidents so I don’t think reducing… Read more »

Luisa Hillard
Reply to  tiki
20, October 2016 10:33 pm

Thank you, tiki. You obviously grasp the issue and I would use Cllr Peacey-Wilcox’s TRO as the perfect example of how difficult these can be and we’ve commiserated together when I’ve had similar trouble in my ward. In my experience what seems like a simple change always has huge amounts of red tape to overcome and this motion will require a very detailed paper to be written… Read more »

Colin
21, October 2016 10:44 am

I would like to thank all the councillors contributing in this thread; it has been a most enjoyable read. I must make an effort to come to the next council meeting, it sounds like fun, although Ms. Hofton often seems to think not.

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined