Accounting calculator on yellow background

New eye-watering losses for Floating Bridge 6 revealed in News OnTheWight investigation (Updated)

Back in October 2020, News OnTheWight worked on a Deep Dive series revealing the then-latest costs associated with Floating Bridge 6.

Floating Bridge 6 (FB6) is the £3.2m vessel that the Isle of Wight council has subsequently laid out in excess of multi-millions for due to failures from the day it went into service in May 2017 to present.

Racking up the costs
Getting a handle on the total costs to date is not straightforward, but they look something like this:

  • Oct 2020 to Jan 2022: Costs minus income £2,418,420
  • Aug 18 to Sep 20: Costs minus income £1,175,599
  • Start to Aug 18: £6,471,217 (not including income)

There would be other internal costs that have not been accounted for and the Solent LEP agreed to fund at least £3m for the procurement of FB6.

However, it’s worth noting that Floating Bridge 5 has been widely reported as having made a profit each year, putting money back into the coffers of the council. FB6 has made a loss every year since it first entered service nearly five years ago.

A timely update
Having had more than a year go by since our Deep Dive series – during which time the bridge has been out of service for months on end, there would have been an increased cost for the tender (Jenny Boat) needed to ferry pedestrians and cyclists across the River Medina, not to mention the lack of income from vehicle traffic – News OnTheWight put in an FOIA request for the latest costs, income and capital expenditure.

We now have that information and can share with readers below.

Loss of more than £2.3m
When comparing the expenditure and capital costs alongside the income, between October 2020 to Jan 2022, it’s clear there are still serious problems with FB6.

DescriptionCost
Expenditure (Oct 20 to Jan 22)£2,841,836
Capital expenditure (Oct 20 to Mar 2022)£187,869
Income (Oct 20 to Jan 22)£611,285
Total-£2,418,420

Revenue Expenditure Oct 2020 – Jan 2022
The first table below sets out the breakdown of expenditure for FB6. This includes the usual running costs you would expect, such as staff pay and pensions, as well as fuel costs, insurance and banking fees, etc.

It also includes a large sum attributed to ‘private contractors’ which might puzzle some. This relates to the cost of putting on the Jenny Boat when FB6 was out of service for 3+ months, as well as the cost of the push boat (MV Seaclear) which is required to hold FB6 in place during certain tides.

Notes:
1. This report excludes costs for internal central support service recharges and depreciation. These costs are however included in the published audited financial statement figures.

2. This report excludes expenditure of £27,880 that was used to transport school children by separate launch during Covid pandemic, and £47 on hand sanitizer

3. This report excludes capital expenditure

Capital expenditure
The capital expenditure from October 2020 to date totalled more than £187,000. This was the period where the Floating Bridge was out of action for several months, during which time more problems were discovered, and a great deal more work than expected had to take place.

The breakdown of capital costs can be seen below.

FB6 Capital works descriptionValue
Hydraulic system repair August 2020£39,213.66
Hydraulic system repair August 2021£27,813.87
Work to develop chain clearance options and support trials£9,720
Design work for Variable Message Signage Units£423.64
Design and manufacture pedestrian ramp to be deployed on exceptionally high tides£4,366.25
Remove waiting area canopy and provide galvanised steelwork and railings£18,097.29
Partial purchase cost of VMS units£55,742.25
Purchase of new chains£23,750
Supply, installation and commission of CCTV System£8,742.5
Total£187,869.46

Income
Foot Passenger and Vehicle Income between October 2020 and January 2022 is not surprisingly, less than you would expect, given FB6 was out of service for some time during that period.

Oct 2020-
Mar 2021
Apr 2021 -
Jan 2022
Total
Vehicle Income£97,421£287,741£385,163
Foot Passengers£58,180£167,942£226,122
Total£155,601£455,684£611,285

Mediation continues
The Isle of Wight Council are currently in mediation with the designer (BCQT) and builder (Mainstay Marine) of FB6, prior to taking legal action over the failures of the design and build and subsequent losses to the Council.

Cllr Phil Jordan, the cabinet member responsible for transport and infrastructure, confirmed at last week’s Cabinet meeting that “mediation hasn’t finished or stopped and IWC did not walk away from mediation”.

It had been reported earlier in the week that two days were set out for the IWC, the designer and builder of Floating Bridge 6 to reach a settlement, but the “the council walked away empty-handed”. Cllr Jordan refuted this claim and said mediation was ongoing.

Article edit
8.30am 18th Mar 2022 – Added section near top of article setting out costs to date minus income

Image: StellrWeb under CC BY 2.0

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
2 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
daveq
20, March 2012 11:02 am

Despite Keith’s submission to the Select Committee and letters to the them from several Islanders, all poiinting out that the evidence they were given by Cllr Pugh was, to say the least, very misleading, the Select Committee have not recalled Cllr Pugh to question the veracity of his evidence. This looks as though, if you are of the same political persuasion as the majority of the committee,… Read more »

Stephen
Reply to  daveq
20, March 2012 1:02 pm

These are the members of the Select Committee that took all the Libraries evidence. What majority is there here? Member Party Constituency John Whittingdale MP (Chair) Conservative Maldon Therese Coffey MP Conservative Suffolk Coastal Damian Collins MP Conservative Folkestone and Hythe Philip Davies MP Conservative Shipley Paul Farrelly MP Labour Newcastle-under-Lyme Louise Mensch MP Conservative Corby Steve Rotheram MP Labour Liverpool Walton Adrian Sanders MP Liberal Democrat… Read more »

No.5
Reply to  Stephen
20, March 2012 1:23 pm

errrr!!! a government one 6/5

island wide
Reply to  Stephen
20, March 2012 3:30 pm

It is alleged that Louise Mensch and Damian Collins both welcomed Cllr David Pugh warmly before he gave evidence. Could this be because they know him personally, I do not know. If it is the case then perhaps they should not have been sitting on the body questioning Cllr Pugh. Openness and transparency are something that seems to have gone by the book these days from government… Read more »

daveq
Reply to  island wide
20, March 2012 3:35 pm

It was after he had given his evidence, he was hugged by one of them, this would lead anyone seeing it to conclude that they were far more than just acquaintences!
The labour MP who gave Pugh such a hard trime was Paul Farrelly, he was obviously well briefed and fully aware what he was facing!

Margie
20, March 2012 12:12 pm

Go Keith – the truth is coming out now!

Martin
20, March 2012 1:15 pm

Well done Keith. It was painful listening to the presenters though they seemed pretty ignorant of what was being discussed.

daveq
20, March 2012 2:10 pm

It would be intersting to hear what DP has to say about this one. He will find it difficult to dispute what Keith has said as it was all 100% honest.

rose
Reply to  daveq
20, March 2012 3:14 pm

it has always been a one sided story from cll pugh, it has been a long time coming to get the other side told, and i know which one i believe in, there is much evidence which is being held , and hopefully will now come out, well done keith, we need more people like you …………

Mr Sandown Sally
20, March 2012 2:36 pm

No-one of sound mind could possibly think David Pugh tells fibs. Could they? I think actually calling someone a liar in parliament is not allowed? No wonder they all tell so many untruths!

daveq
Reply to  Mr Sandown Sally
20, March 2012 3:39 pm

I don’t know if you listened to todays interview but a newspaper report was quoted by one of the interviewers and I am trying to find a copy- from the description of DP given, whoever made the comment obviously knew him very well. If you didn’t hear it, I could not possibly repeat it here, Sally and Simon would ban me for life! But if I find… Read more »

Steve Goodman
Reply to  daveq
20, March 2012 11:23 pm

A quick check of VB provides us with the following: “+7 Curious of Shanklin says: 16, February 2010 at 6:20 pm I seem to recall that David Pugh is no stranger to public controversy; he was featured in the national press in 2003 after the public row on television (cut I believe), when he was accused of being a “cheating b…..d”, during election campaigning for the Young… Read more »

No.5
Reply to  Steve Goodman
21, March 2012 12:51 am

it was ‘Tory Youth’ rather than ‘Young Tories’ Pugh was part of that rebranding disaster

daveq
Reply to  Steve Goodman
21, March 2012 6:37 am

Thanks Steve, I need the actual cutting/s as I have a use for it/them. Anyone any ideas?

Steve Goodman
Reply to  daveq
21, March 2012 9:51 am

Just found this (by googling daily mirror david pugh): – December 6, 2009 at 1:01 pm 1 comment Very interesting article concerning our Council Leader David Pugh. Thought we would share it with you, as it gives an insight into why we should not trust David about his vision of the ‘Isle of Wight’ becoming an Eco Island . Daily Mirror, 11/9/03, p.20 – The Tory party’s… Read more »

Black dog
20, March 2012 4:11 pm

O. M. G. I just feel sorry for the people of Shanklin who actually voted DP in. How embarrassing for that beautiful Town and its people? Where now for the Island Conservatives? They will have to act soon if they are to remain in power, the next time around. I wonder if anyone amongst the Island Conservative the has the guts to invite Keith Fagan along to… Read more »

D'arcy
20, March 2012 4:46 pm

I’m not sure whether Vectis Radio presenters have a full grasp of the arguments, particularly in the light of their earlier cosy interview with DP a few weeks ago. These issues are so important, I would suggest that the BBC South Politics show on Sundays might provide a better forum for discussion.

Concerned
Reply to  D'arcy
20, March 2012 5:25 pm

D’arcy, perhaps someone should tip them off as this is a bit of a hot potato.

D'arcy
Reply to  Concerned
20, March 2012 5:48 pm

Down to Keith really as only he knows exactly what he has submitted and so would have decide whether he wants that level of exposure at this stage.

Concerned
Reply to  D'arcy
20, March 2012 8:14 pm

If you know of Keith you could ask him, he could only say no or he could welcome the opportunity.

Asite2c
20, March 2012 5:47 pm

In my opinion, career minded politicians like Pugh only think about themselves and seem to think lying, spin, dishonesty and misleading others is perfectly acceptable in today’s society. Sadly, it’s nothing these days to see politicians lie through their teeth and get away with it.

Concerned
Reply to  Asite2c
20, March 2012 7:33 pm

Pugh made the comment that the electorate will ultimately decide on Vectis Radio a couple of weeks ago. Well let us see if the people of Shanklin can get behind another candidate who puts Shanklin and the people of Shanklin first

Concerned
20, March 2012 8:08 pm

Does anyone know if I can listen to the interview? Do they have a replay section? Someone told me that sometimes they repeat interviews at 10pm

biggmarket
Reply to  Concerned
21, March 2012 10:28 am

I just heard Ian Mac say that a repeat of the interview will be on Vectis Radio tonight at 10PM and it will also be podcast.

Concerned
Reply to  biggmarket
21, March 2012 11:59 pm

Bl**dy Hell I have just listened to Keith’s interview on Vectis Radio. He has just said everything we suspected of Pugh’s tactics for a long time. Has anyone let BBC South’s Politics show know about this? It will make a great story and lend weight to regime change. Its is a shame that Blair and Bush Jnr are no longer in power – We could have arranged… Read more »

Island Monkey
20, March 2012 8:11 pm

Another example of young David caught being economical with the actualite again?

I hope the BBC politics show do follow this up.

Chris Wilmott
20, March 2012 9:00 pm

Good for you Keith: keep up the good work!

No surprises here, though – what would anyone expect of Cllr Pugh? Surely opennesss and transparency would be two of the least likely candidates!

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined