solent region google maps

Solent Devolution / Southern Powerhouse announcement close?

Simon Letts, the leader of Southampton Council, has given a couple of hints that things might be moving on the Devolution of the Hampshire councils – originally called Southern Powerhouse – well, at least some of the councils.

Last night he Tweeted, “The deal is done. Now we need to find out who agrees with it.”

Simon Letts Tweet: "The deal is done. Now we need to find out who agrees with it."

OnTheWight contacted Southampton City Council’s press office about the Tweets of Simon Letts. They said,

“We understand that talks are going well, and we expect an announcement soon.”

Southern Powerhouse split strengthened?
Further weight was added to the possible split of the originally-anticipated Southern Powerhouse, with Cllr Letts Tweeting at the start of the week about ‘Solent Devolution’.

Simon Letts Twitter: "Solent Devolution"

It’s been expected that the south Hampshire bid would include Southampton, Portsmouth and the Isle of Wight, but Isle of Wight council leader, Cllr Jonathan Bacon, told OnTheWight they would not sign any deal that didn’t secure financial stability for the Island.

Background on possible Southern Powerhouse split
Less than two weeks ago, the plans for forming a Southern Powerhouse through a devolution deal with Hampshire came under threat.

It was revealed the Treasury had different plans and wanted to split Hampshire in two, forming north and south bids.

Many feel the thinking behind it is that, with many successful businesses in their area, the north Hampshire councils aren’t keen to share their what-will-be significant earnings from local business rates with their less fortunate cousins in the south, who don’t have the luxury as many businesses yet.

Image: © Google Maps

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
18 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Michael Lilley
12, March 2016 6:06 am

As deputy leader of Green Party, I am concerned that the future of the Island is being discussed and words like deals being brokered without real open debate on the Island. Fight for Wight is campaigning to get the Island’s unique case of need highlighted and this campaign has to be linked to Devolution talks. I personally would like to see an Isle of Wight Act of… Read more »

Cicero
12, March 2016 8:07 am

The next stage will be local negotiators in the devolution talks will be bribed into agreeing to concentrate local power in a “Hants & IoW Mayor”, a purely political placeman reporting to central government like that other expensive useless as that other political placeman, the PCC. Hear the drums and stamping feet, the gauleiters of the next Tory dictatorship are about to be appointed. Any truth in… Read more »

Stewart Blackmore
13, March 2016 12:07 pm

Simon Letts, Leader of Soton City Council has just said on the Sunday Politics that a deal has been done and that deal includes a directly elected mayor for the whole Solent region including the IW. This despite the fact that the IW has rejected elected mayors in the past, including in a referendum. So, what happens to IW Council and its elected councillors? Never mind consulting… Read more »

phil jordan
Reply to  Stewart Blackmore
13, March 2016 12:29 pm

Stewart: As of this exact moment in time…the Isle of Wight is NOT part of any Solent devolution Bid, approach or offer to Government and we have NOT signed up to any agreement that he *may* wish to make reference to. With or without a ‘mayor’. Simon is therefore incorrect in that statement – if that is what he said…. I did not see it personally so… Read more »

Stewart Blackmore
Reply to  phil jordan
13, March 2016 4:04 pm

That’s exactly what he said, Phil. ‘Agreement has been reached’.
If it’s as you say then Jonathan Bacon should be talking to him urgently.

derek
Reply to  phil jordan
13, March 2016 6:28 pm

Another case of the Island being pushed around by the mainland

derek
Reply to  derek
13, March 2016 6:37 pm

Do you need help from another group like previous, to take on the Solent Area etc?

Simon Cooke
Reply to  Stewart Blackmore
13, March 2016 4:44 pm

The episode is now on BBC iPlayer, the relevant discussion starts about 55 minutes in. I don’t think he does specifically state the IW is in the deal, but rather his repeated use of the term ‘Solent Area’ infers it. In particular he did state that the mayor would be be the ‘whole of the Solent Area’. Given any reasonable person would assume the IW is in… Read more »

phil jordan
Reply to  Simon Cooke
13, March 2016 7:01 pm

stewart: Thanks….and thanks wightgeek for the very helpful timings on iplayer…. Just to re-affirm/re-assure…. currently the Island is NOT part of that ‘Solent’ area insofar as any devolution signed agreement/Bid is concerned. We have been, as you know, party to the ongoing talks for about 6 months but we have always maintained that we have to have a financial settlement agreement from *somewhere*…ie, either the Treasury/Government or… Read more »

Cicero
Reply to  phil jordan
13, March 2016 7:57 pm

(PJ) “the mayor would be for the combined area only.”

Precisely….. reporting to central government for te control of about 1.4 million people, finances, infrastructure, housing numbers etc … a godsend for investment bankers and developers.

Too much power in the hands of a political placeman of the same ideological bent as the government…?

(You can see it now ‘Osborne’s mate for Mayor”….)!

phil jordan
Reply to  Cicero
13, March 2016 8:17 pm

cicero: I am not saying I support this approach… but it is being forced down upon those who wish (and probably/possibly for those that don’t!) to have a devolution ‘deal’. For the Island, the outlook is bleak. We already *know* by 2020 the RSG will be gone in lieu of 100% business rate retention… a scheme that just does not work for the Island in it’s current… Read more »

Cicero
Reply to  Cicero
13, March 2016 8:39 pm

(PJ) I understand the problem as you have explained it clearly many times. Thanks for that. However, is it right to sell out democratic principles for short-term financial benefit? You ask “if a devolution deal saved financial problems) from happening should we consider it?” and “if a devolution *deal* offered up the financial ‘security’ (and it’s not really a big financial ask in the wider scheme of… Read more »

Cicero
Reply to  Cicero
13, March 2016 8:45 pm

,,,, as you say there is a ” wider scheme of things” such as “Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty; power is ever stealing from the many to the few.” (Wendell Phillips (1852)…. something US citizens have forgotten over the last few years.

Simon Cooke
Reply to  Stewart Blackmore
13, March 2016 4:46 pm
sam salt
Reply to  Stewart Blackmore
13, March 2016 5:33 pm

Stewart, surely the referendum you speak about was solely an Island issue at the time. Did we or did we not want an IW mayor. This is something entirely different, is it not?
The way local government is changing means moving with the times, something the Island struggles with.

Cicero
13, March 2016 12:25 pm

The Solentgau will have a new gauleiter reporting to the next dictator in the Home office. (just like the PCC soon to be PFCC).

Invest in suppliers of boots, belts and armbands!

Rod Manley
13, March 2016 1:07 pm

The Conservatives are split these days over what type of devolution they want, the Council shouldn’t press ahead with any of it.

Cicero
15, March 2016 3:05 pm

I see that Blair’s mate, Lord Adonis- he who screwed up education with the academy system!- is promoting big investment in HS3. I wonder who will benefit from more state largesse going into private pockets?

(Just when you thought Tone was too busy evading the Chilton Report and counting his property and consultancy millions, his parasites emerge from the shadows to carry on Blairite Tory policies.)

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined