artists impression of st georges park development

South Coast Leisure request further changes to St George’s Park deal

South Coast Leisure (SCL), the company planning to redevelop the former St George’s Football ground in Newport, are requesting that Isle of Wight council change the restrictions on the option to buy IWC land at the rear of the site.

The request for change was revealed in a delegated decision notice published this week, recommending the council agree to the changes (see Appendix 2 below) and to delegate authority to the Director of Regeneration (Chris Ashman), in consultation with the Cabinet member for resources (Cllr Stuart Hutchinson), to agree the precise contract terms.

What’s being requested
The council papers say,

SCL is now requesting that all title restrictions be removed as a result of the extremely challenging retail market conditions which were not apparent in 2016/17, recently made worse by Covid: SCL advise that changes to market demand, combined with the restrictions on use, the ability for the council to buy back the former option land if SCL do not meet the agreed timescales for development and the requirement on SCL to only sell the two sites as one is proving unattractive to both tenants and funders, rendering the scheme unviable.

SCL advise that they require as much control and flexibility as possible if they are to successfully deliver the new retail park.

Essentially, the council is being asked to convert controls which were agreed five years ago when the retail market in particular was very different to that of today and convert them to value which will be paid to the council in the future if these changes prove to have additional value.

McDonald’s have submitted plans for a drive-through restaurant, and Aldi and Wickes are rumoured to be interested in the site. SCL claim the scheme would create 200 jobs.

Councillor resigned over plans
Newport Central ward councillor, Cllr Julie Jones Evans, objected to the planning application for the site in October 2019 – resigning from the council’s Planning Committee immediately afterwards.

She said:

“This is an abomination, it is against our regeneration policy. Our high streets are dying. We want to regenerate our town centre.

“I dispute the findings totally. We need to put the heart and life and soul back into Newport.”

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
7 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Colin
21, March 2024 6:38 pm

Shambolic, the whole lot of them. They spend more time arguing about how they want to make decisions but are incapable of making any. Dither and Delay. And that’s coming from a councillor. They should be ashamed of themselves.

septua
21, March 2024 8:11 pm

Councillors each receive an allowance of ca. £9,000 p.a. to carry out their duties, and they receive more if they have extra responsibilities. How many employers would continue to pay employees this amount if they failed to carry out their job properly?

RootDown'92
Reply to  septua
21, March 2024 8:32 pm

Arguably the Cllrs who have repeatedly blocked the DIPS are doing what they were elected to do, as they proudly campaigned as nimby’s.
What £ they receive has nothing whatsoever to do with how the votes get tallied up.

karen
22, March 2024 12:51 am

Filibuster at its greatest extent over 7 years. Did anyone really think the originators would let it happen?

Angela Hewitt
22, March 2024 7:50 am

I love nimbys. They have stopped the courtry from being completely covered in concrete. However, in this case they can’t possibly be nimbys because they are holding up DIPS and allowing developers to carry on concreting without redress!!

Benny C
Reply to  Angela Hewitt
22, March 2024 1:36 pm

Exactly. Messrs Stewart, Ward, Churchman et al allowed the plan to lapse. How about holding them properly to account for the consequences? In aiming for other short term goals they trashed, properly trashed, our planning controls. Not a price worth paying, not communicated, quite possibly denied, but true.

billp
Reply to  Benny C
22, March 2024 2:47 pm

The previous plan has not lapsed. It was implemented in 2012 and can apply if necessary until 2027.

sjw1
22, March 2024 8:37 am

Let’s face it they have absolutely no intention of producing a plan, it’s just make-work & holding pointless meetings that only produce hot air. It would be laughable if it wasn’t so serious. What a shambles!

Snowwolf1
22, March 2024 2:40 pm

Lock them in a room and sort it out, the Council cannot afford to waste £660,000 of taxpayers money when they have already wasted enough on poor organisation and information gathering not to mention the inhouse bickering during the past to decades and seem to be getting worse. Start communicating and work as a team – it isn’t rocket science more a case of “too many Chiefs… Read more »

vitabrevis
23, March 2024 2:31 pm

So once again the Tories sabotage the Island Plan, allowing more opportunity for Tory-supporting developers to force their unwanted and destructive builds onto the Island. I feel for Cllr Fuller, one of the most genuine and dedicated members and who now has to explain to government why we STILL don’t have a plan. Look forward to yet more 4-bed mansions while the quota of “affordable” houses inexplicably… Read more »

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined