david cameron

WightOut: PM ‘left humiliated’ over Tusk letter on Europe

Iain McKie tells OnTheWight that Wightout is a cross-party political group on the Isle of Wight to make the case for ‘OUT’ in the upcoming EU membership referendum. He shares this release following the publication of the letter from President Donald Tusk to the Members of the European Council relating to the UK renegotiation, 2nd February 2016. Ed


It is quite clear from the letter from Donald Tusk to the European Council that the British Prime Minister has been left humiliated.

On the table are heavily diluted solutions and empty promises that will neither deliver a return of sovereignty to the United Kingdom, nor a framework for meaningful structural reform. Instead, the UK has been offered a series of consolation prizes whose effects will peter out very shortly after adoption, all of which require unanimous approval by the other 27 Member States.

The systemic and institutional problems at the core of the European Union remain unscathed.

Wightout are grateful for all of the genuine efforts made by politicians and civil servants alike in their efforts to try and affect material and beneficial change for the UK in this renegotiation, but believe that this empty package is all that could realistically have been won.

We hope that residents on the Isle of Wight read the proposals in full and come to the conclusion that we are better off out of the EU.

Image: odscz under CC BY 2.0

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
34 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Caconym
2, February 2016 3:32 pm

Its not “cross party”, Its UKIP.

Cicero
Reply to  Caconym
2, February 2016 5:05 pm

I wonder if Iain McKie has actually read the details of the draft decisions accompanying the Tusk letter?

Those interested in facts rather than biased political interpretation can find them in:

http://www.consilium.europa.eu/press-releases-pdf/2016/2/40802208284_en_635900130000000000.pdf

Cicero
Reply to  Cicero
2, February 2016 7:19 pm

The more I read McKie’s letter. the more I am sure that he has not read Tusk’s letter and the draft decisions carefully enough- am I am no supporter of the Cameron government or the Tories. As we saw in the run up to the election, the UKIP candidate has a tendency to look a little silly at times by shooting himself in the foot. Surely he… Read more »

Paleo
2, February 2016 5:15 pm

Quite right, film flam and obfuscation to con the British public, apart from the usual Stockholm Syndrone imbeciles; that we will continue to be a poodle of Merkle.

Stewart Blackmore
2, February 2016 5:57 pm

Just to be perfectly clear; this group cannot call itself cross-party and the Labour Party has no connection or association with it whatsoever.

Typical Ukip obfuscation.

ThomasC
2, February 2016 7:15 pm

I wonder if Mr McKie can put a figure on the number and cost of the armies of UK civil servants that would be needed to be freshly employed post-Brexit to replicate the many different functions the EU fulfils, where the costs are shared across 26 other states? I also wonder how Mr McKie and his Mate A. Turnip think discussions with the (much, much smaller) UK… Read more »

Caconym
Reply to  ThomasC
3, February 2016 6:55 am

Considering the dirty tricks smear campaign that McKie waged against Turner during the General Election, I very much doubt that either of them considers the other “mate”, despite both of them being in the “out” camp. Given that there is no way Turner would share a platform with McKie, and those two are the ony major IW political figures who want out of the EU (and considering… Read more »

Mcduff
2, February 2016 9:57 pm

Wightout seems an appropriate name, McKie is trying to pull the wool over peoples eyes.

Nitonia
3, February 2016 7:31 am

Seriously, has anyone looked at the Wightout website? What a joke! A so called cross party group and there is only one name mentioned (Iain Mckie). The news on the website is so up to date it kindly tells us that they will be at the IW County Show in June 2015. Reading further, every item on there could be replaced by the true sentiment of UKIP/WIghtout… Read more »

Caconym
Reply to  Nitonia
3, February 2016 8:13 am

Indeed, the “Wightout” website is real amateur hour stuff. It wasn’t even up and running for a number of weeks after McKie announced with much fanfare. It is registered in the name of one Daniel Moss (info freely available from Nominet whois), another UKIPer.

As I said, be under no illusions, Wightout IS UKIP.

Cicero
Reply to  Caconym
3, February 2016 11:44 am

With a team of -ahem- one? :-))

Caconym
Reply to  Cicero
3, February 2016 12:42 pm

Two, actually.

Cicero
Reply to  Caconym
3, February 2016 2:20 pm

Or is it one twice, both with the initials IM?
http://www.wightout.org.uk/about-us/the-team

Cicero
3, February 2016 8:33 am

It is fascinating to watch the Daily Heil’s strategy over the last few year as it becomes more stridently anti-Cameron over Brexit, sliding the knife into Osborne’s and Boris’ ribs whenever it has the chance ,while frequently polishing Theresa May’s image. Could it be that this right-wing rag with its anti-Europe, anti-immigrant stance that at one time supported Mosley’s British Union of Fascists- is drifting even more… Read more »

Caconym
Reply to  Cicero
3, February 2016 9:36 am

Ah, dear Theresa, the woman who thinks spying on what every man, woman and child does on the Internet will help stop terrorists.

Cicero
Reply to  Caconym
3, February 2016 4:03 pm

Mmmm! There is a Border Force ship moored in Sandown Bay at the moment. Is this the first stage of a take-over by the Home Office and to prevent Islanders escaping> :-))

Caconym
Reply to  Cicero
3, February 2016 6:02 pm

A Type 45 with a spot of engine trouble, apparently ;)

Cicero
Reply to  Caconym
3, February 2016 6:27 pm

“Border Force” written on the side gives it away! :-))

Pinky
3, February 2016 9:55 am

Isn’t WightOut the name of an information service for gay people on the Isle of Wight?

Robert Jones
Reply to  Pinky
3, February 2016 10:24 am

I don’t know, but wouldn’t it be marvellous if it was?

Caconym
Reply to  Robert Jones
3, February 2016 11:02 am

It actually is/was:-
http://www.thegayguide.org.uk/show?id=4b5cf521f4001

They don’t own the wightout.org.uk domain any more (IW UKIP does), but penty of links from LGBT sites still link to it.

You really can’t write comedy like that (unless you are a Kipper, that is)….

Vix Lowthion
Reply to  Pinky
3, February 2016 11:11 am

The IW part of the Wight Out logo looks like a kiss.

Cicero
Reply to  Vix Lowthion
3, February 2016 11:35 am

You are not alleging that Wightout is “puckered” (or a similar homophone) are you Vix? :-))

Cicero
3, February 2016 11:33 am

(from Wightout website)
“No Liability. No representation, warranty or undertaking is given as to the accuracy, completeness or validity of the Information by WightOut.org.uk or its partners.”

Says it all really, doesn’t it? :-))

Minnieb
3, February 2016 12:09 pm

Probably the most important issue that we will vote on during our lifetime and the usual suspects continue to post puerile and insulting views. What a shame!

Caconym
Reply to  Minnieb
3, February 2016 12:36 pm

No more insulting than Mr McKie trying to suggest he has created some kind of grand brexit coalition for the IW, when anyone with any sense knows its just UKIP in disguise. The fact that they are so disorganised that they announced their website weeks before it was up, and used a domain name without first checking its provenance rather suggests to me that they are not… Read more »

Cicero
Reply to  Minnieb
3, February 2016 3:59 pm

So why not make your arguments on this “most important issue”. i.e. for and
against Brexit, Minnieb, instead of just whinging from the sidelines?

As you say, it would be a shame not to discuss your input.

Cicero
3, February 2016 5:07 pm

Kippers seem happier with throwing red arrows rather than debate.

Not surprising really, I suppose.

Cicero
Reply to  Cicero
3, February 2016 6:28 pm

QED! :-))

bigj
4, February 2016 9:29 am

Apart from political bickering, does he not have a point? Cameron has kept us waiting for his hard bargaining, feeds us a damp squid, which will only be passed if the rest of Europe agree. UKIP currently represent the majority (down arrows coming from opposition) of the public as far as getting out of Brussels controlled Europe, so give them a chance, then get back to your… Read more »

Cicero
4, February 2016 11:52 am

Ok Bigj here is their chance to debate. This is my view on Brexit. Against Brexit: The UK needs to be attached to a larger group for long-term defence purposes. The choice is EU or US (btw NATO is controlled by the US). I prefer to have defence decisions made 500 miles away in Brussels that can be influenced by the UK government and would itself be… Read more »

Cicero
Reply to  Cicero
4, February 2016 12:02 pm

PS If TTIP is signed I would campaign for Brexit to avoid Wall St taking over the world.

Cicero
Reply to  Cicero
4, February 2016 12:27 pm

Sorry I got my knickers twisted with the implied double negatives.

What my final paragraph should say is :

“Summary: For me staying in the EU is more important than the leaving it . That said, if the UK decides to stay in the EU, it should be on the basis of the changes suggested above.”

bigj
5, February 2016 9:36 am

In reply Cicero:- [:-))] Against Brexit: Defence In this day and age I’m sure we could defend ourselves better from todays warfare out of the EU Where does the threat come from? Within the 500 mile zone or without? For Brexit: 1. Correct, radical change. Did Cameron get this on his list? Will he ever? 2. Correct, closely examined. Did Cameron get this on his list? Will… Read more »

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined