Damien Nettles: Reward deadline fast approaching

Readers will remember the announcement made by Police at the beginning of October last year, that they would offer a £20,000 reward for information that leads to the location of teenager, Damien Nettles, who has been missing from the Isle of Wight for 16 years.

Since the reward was announced, Police say they have received over 30 pieces of information which is being assessed by detectives, “who are keeping an open mind about future lines of enquiry”.

However, it’s worth noting that the reward does have a deadline attached to it, the beginning of April 2013.

Valerie Nettles: “Rewards have a shelf life”
When the reward was announced, Damien’s mother, Valerie Nettles told On The Wight, “This reward has been a long time coming and now that is a reality I would like to stress this is a window of opportunity.”

She went on to say, “Rewards have a shelf life. Don’t hesitate.

“If you know, really know what happened to Damien this is your chance to come clean and in the process you stand to benefit from a substantial amount of money.”

Get in touch
Anyone with information about the Damien Nettles case can contact Hampshire Constabulary by phoning 101 and asking for the Major Investigation Team at Fratton police station in Portsmouth or emailing operation.ridgewood@hampshire.pnn.police.uk

Mini-Com users can call 01962 875000. Information can be given anonymously by phoning the independent Crimestoppers charity on 0800 555 111.

Image: © Tax Brackets

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
1 Comment
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Steve Goodman
31, January 2012 6:56 pm

Might be fair to use this for road improvement.

Reminder; council chose to slash roads spending from 2006/7, and wish us to believe that a discredited PFI scam should be our only option for roads maintenance.

concerned of IW
Reply to  Steve Goodman
1, February 2012 8:10 am

Do you really think any additional money should be spent on roads or is it just another reason to use the word “discredited” and the acronym “pfi” in the same sentance? Maybe the money could be used on bolstering services for the more vulnerable members of the community. It seems that this story reports an increase in revenue that can be reassigned elsewhere which can only be… Read more »

Steve Goodman
Reply to  concerned of IW
2, February 2012 12:30 am

Fellow Concerned: If our council hadn’t decided to stop spending what was needed for road maintenance, I doubt that they would now be desperate to spend even more of our money on it by wanting us to compensate for the loss of the current grant by changing to a you know what. I’m in good company: Private Eye; Daily Telegraph; opposition politicians (until they become addicted ruling… Read more »

john
31, January 2012 7:16 pm

The report says that parking charges have not risen since 2008, yet you say 2010??

Daniel Hannan fan
Reply to  john
31, January 2012 7:20 pm

You are right John

Martin William Wareham
31, January 2012 7:33 pm

Daniel and John are you in love.

Simon Haytack
Reply to  Martin William Wareham
31, January 2012 9:00 pm

Immature comment? We’re not in primary school.

Asite2c
1, February 2012 9:43 am

In my opinion, the decision to increase parking charges was made to recover the money lost from the mess Pugh made with his ridiculous attempt to introduce exhorbitant, Island resident annual parking fees.

High parking fees and bus fares obviously deter people from using town centres. Is it any wonder so many shops are closing down?

john
Reply to  Asite2c
1, February 2012 8:33 pm

Asite2c, the parking charges haven’t risen since 2008 as has been confirmed by Simon.

Mr T.
2, February 2012 9:08 am

No-one needs to pay for parking in any island town.

john
Reply to  Mr T.
2, February 2012 9:45 pm

You’re right Mr T, they could just raise the council tax instead