Government Review Statutory Obligations of Local Councils: Libraries At Further Risk

Benedicte Page of The Guardian has just published news that will cause great concern for anyone campaigning to save libraries facing the axe.

In the report, it states that the Government are undergoing a review of local authority statutory duties, one of which is to provide a “comprehensive and efficient” library service.

Ripple of horror
The article begins “A ripple of horror has spread through library campaigners at the news that the only legal protection enjoyed by the public library service has been put up for review as part of a government initiative to scrap “burdensome” duties on local authorities.

“The Department of Communities and Local Government (DCLG) has launched a wholesale review of the 1,294 statutory obligations with which local authorities are required to comply. These include one considered the foundation stone of the public library service, the duty to provide a “comprehensive and efficient” library service under the 1964 Public Libraries and Museums Act.”

Bad news for legal challengers
This could be extremely bad news for the various campaigners who plan to legally challenge their local council’s decisions to close 525 of the 4,500 libraries nationwide.

This, of course, includes the challenge being made on behalf of Island residents as VB reported earlier in the week.

Take part in the survey
Brian Hall, president of librarian body The Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals (CILIP), told the Guardian, it would be “incredibly difficult to hold local authorities to account” without the statutory protection.

He went on to urge everyone to take part in the online review of statutory duties. You have until 25th April to complete the survey.

The list of obligations under review is massive and given that they could be axed is of great concern. Details of the 1,294 statutory obligations can be found on the communities.gov.uk Website.

Complete the online survey (Reference number for the relevant library statute is DCMS_027)

Read the Guardian article in full.

Many thanks to Shirley B for alerting us to this story

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
12 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Martin
17, March 2011 1:59 pm

I have really mixed feelings about this. Local government has increasingly over the years been given more and more “duties” by central government. Much of local authority funding is provided centrally, in part because of these imposed roles. Trimming them back should allow local councils to provide the services that local people want, rather than those central government says they must. There is an argument that some… Read more »

Stephen
17, March 2011 2:07 pm

Is it possible that the elected leaders of IWC knew that such a review, and its potential outcome, was imminent and therefore have acted in the full knowledge that their decisions are ‘untouchable’ and not reversable. So much for open and transparent Government.

Asite2c
17, March 2011 2:33 pm

How low can these politians go? They’re even prepared to change the laws just to force through their nasty policies. It’s a classic case of moving the goal posts.

“I Predict a Riot”.

wabbit
Reply to  Asite2c
17, March 2011 2:48 pm

They are as low as a snakes a–e in a wheelrut already.It’s a guessing game from now on or make it up as you go along seems to a popular answer!!

Meursault
17, March 2011 2:35 pm

Typical Tory approach – spout on that core frontline services should not be cut and LA’s should be looking at cutting management instead – nice soundbite there. But on the other hand remove the statutory obligations that currently protect such frontline services. Ultimately they simply want a system where they can close or privatise anything at will.

rosie
Reply to  Meursault
17, March 2011 2:49 pm

we will see them all in court if needed , human rights are being breached, we live in a democratic country, we have rights and the govt cant keep changing that to suit themselves , european courts seem the only option next. this is far from over .

montana sliver
17, March 2011 3:42 pm

If complying with the law is “burdensome” on local authorities then change the law.

Enhances the reputation of politicians, locally and nationally, doesn’t it?

montana sliver
17, March 2011 3:52 pm

So if they changed the law that stops you robbing banks it wouldn’t only be bankers that are able to get away with robbing banks, I’m definitely in favour of that.

DaveQ
Reply to  montana sliver
17, March 2011 4:31 pm

What do you mean rob banks? It us the thieving b******s rob. Why do you think we’re having all these cuts?

montana sliver
17, March 2011 4:39 pm

@DaveQ, yeah but Dave I, in common with bankers and politicians, have no scruples whatsoever so I don’t care who it is I’m robbing just as long as I get my filthy thieving hands on the money.

Stephen
17, March 2011 6:34 pm

Latest edition of ‘Private Eye’ at page 27 has an informative piece about an American library outsourcing business which has ‘ambitions to run 15%
of UK libraries within 5 years. This year Ventnor and Bembridge and then onto where?

lilly
17, March 2011 7:01 pm

This is just the tip of the iceberg. Too often we have taken for granted the hard won rights and protections services and individuals have had in this country, This Government is bent on destroying them. Taking the country out of the European Court of human rights is also on the agenda. These are all attempts to stop ordinary people having any means of justice if the… Read more »

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined