polling card

Have your registered to vote? If not, you have one week to do it

This in from the council. Ed


With only one week to go until the deadline to register to vote in local elections, the Isle of Wight Council is urging residents to make sure they are registered in time.

On Thursday 4 May voters in the Isle of Wight will go to the polls for the Isle of Wight Council and some parish and town council local elections. The deadline to register to vote is midnight on Thursday 13 April.

A common misconception is that if you pay council tax, you will be automatically registered. This is NOT the case – you are not automatically registered to vote. The only way you can make sure you have your say in elections, is to register on the Electoral Register. Once registered, you do not have to re-register, unless you move, in which case you need to update your details.

Anyone not registered to vote at their current address or wishing to update with their address, can register online.

The Isle of Wight Council electoral registration officer, Chris Mathews, said:

“With only one week to go, time is running out to make sure you can take part in the elections on Thursday 4 May. These elections are an opportunity to have a say on who represents local people on issues that directly affect day-to-day life here in the Isle of Wight. But if you’re not registered by 13 April, you won’t be able to vote.”

Everyone must register themselves
Head of campaigns at the Electoral Commission, Emma Hartley, said:

“Our research shows that nearly a third of people think that if you are old enough to vote then you are automatically registered, but in fact everyone must register themselves. Registering to vote is easy to do online and means that you can take part in these important elections; so make sure you are registered to vote by the deadline.”

For further information about the elections, please visit our Website

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
0 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Cicero
15, December 2015 11:59 am

Good on yer Sally! Thank goodness for professional journalists!

Vix Lowthion
15, December 2015 12:21 pm

Thank you OTW for this. It means I can follow this meeting at my desk in my lunch hour, because I cannot attend as I am at work.

craig williams
15, December 2015 1:03 pm

Whats the chances of having a line into newport ?

Frank James
Reply to  craig williams
15, December 2015 2:00 pm

Nowhere near as high as having a very pricey and controversial HS2 line elsewhere, and probably nowhere near as high as losing Island Line thanks to Tigger and his friends.

Chris
Reply to  craig williams
16, December 2015 12:42 am

Realistically, nil.

Rod Manley
15, December 2015 2:03 pm

Stewart Blackmore is absolutely right it will ultimately be a political decision made by Claire Perry.

stephen
15, December 2015 4:10 pm

20 minute service would be good but would there be requirements for extra rolling stock and crew to maintain a resilient diagram of train movements.

Presumably clever timetabling to get passing points at St Johns, Sandown & possibly Brading – in case of late running – would be necessary.

Chris
Reply to  stephen
16, December 2015 12:45 am

I understand an unadvertised 20min service has been run occasionally in recent years, but there’s not much opportunity to make up delays and its rarely justified – rationalisation, with just a loop at Brading, would cut costs and allow a half hourly service.

Richard
16, December 2015 7:51 am

Chris
Are you saying we should just have the one loop at Brading and remove all the lines?
This would not allow any flexiability in the event of disruption.

Chris
Reply to  Richard
16, December 2015 6:23 pm

Yes, apparently this is what Network Rail were proposing just a few years ago when they were looking to resignal during the Olympics and realistically a single loop would be perfectly sufficient. Removing the second track between Esplanade and Smallbrook would cut maintenance and renewal costs, allow the Steam Railway to operate into Ryde St Johns, and perhaps see some speed restrictions raised by removing points and… Read more »

Richard
16, December 2015 9:59 pm

Chris How would we maintain flexiability if we have an operational incident? At the moment because we have the infrastructure in place to play trains we can still maintain a service of sorts. Also how does it allow for growth if we give up this infrastructure? How nice would it be to run a service to Newport, but it’s not going to happen because all the infrastructure… Read more »

Chris
Reply to  Richard
17, December 2015 1:12 am

It would make little difference having one passing place instead of alternating between two, especially if the loop at Brading was ‘dynamic’ – long enough that trains can pass at speed rather than stopping to wait. I’m not suggesting selling land off for housing but the current infrastructure was for a 20/20/20 minute service that almost never ran – a single loop will cut renewal and maintenance… Read more »

phil008
19, December 2015 8:41 pm

the biggest mistake here is the length of the franchise, 7-9 years doesnt bode well for any company to invest, why wasnt a longer franchise considered? Chiltern Railways have a 22 year franchise, that enables the company to invest knowing it will re coup its money over the years. Light rail has been suggested and whilst this would reduce costs, the cost to install would be very… Read more »

phil008
21, December 2015 2:38 pm

Heres some rough working out of figures based on information from the franchise consultations on DfT website. Station footfall for Lymington Pier is 123,918. Assuming they travel the length of the branch line at 4.00 for a day return generates 495,672.00. With the half hourly service starting at 06:14 and finishing around 23:00 that would require 3 drivers and 3 guards, plus the need for 2 more… Read more »

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined