Letter To The Editor: Occupy Isle of Wight General Assembly

This press release in from Occupy Isle of Wight about their next meeting, in their own words. Ed

Occupy protesterThe next Occupy IOW General Assembly will be meeting in St James Square in Newport on Saturday at 1.15pm.

This is a chance for EVERYONE, the 99%, here on the Island to come together to work towards positive, constructive ways of tackling the very real problems facing Islanders.

If you have ideas or suggestions as to how the movement can affect change for Island people then please come along on Saturday and make your voice heard.

Direct democracy
The process of direct democracy is used within the movement to ensure that everyone’s voice can be heard. There is no hierarchy, everyone works together to come to decisions through consensus.

Although this can be slower, because it’s not top down, decisions being voted on are stronger. When decisions are made by the Council, or government too often people don’t feel that their view is being represented, but through direct democracy at a general assembly you can have a real say.

Key points of discussion will be:

  • Economic change- Making a difference as individuals, together.
  • Political change- Improving engagement in the political process.
  • Ecological Change- Working towards a sustainable future, now.
  • Media change-Supporting independent media and being aware of monopolies.

We want Island people to feel empowered to make little changes together to make a big difference. We aim to provide real alternatives that we can take forward to our representatives in the Council and in Government, and for the Island to be the tiny ember that sparks the fire of change.

Image: [casey] under CC BY 2.0

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
11 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Itch you can't scratch
18, November 2010 2:11 pm

Well no surprise there then. The monkeys have applauded the organ grinder. Busby (who now lives with David) will keep her mouth shut not only to protect him but to keep her job. It’s all so horribly ugly and predictable.Don’t forget to say an extra “thankyou baby Jesus” David at church cos yer a christian aren’t you? If thats whats waiting in heaven I won’t bother thanks.… Read more »

Robbo
Reply to  Itch you can't scratch
18, November 2010 3:10 pm

No surprise at all. An ‘investigation’ by someone who, with the best will in the world wasn’t going to be able to find against the the leader of the council if they wanted their career to continue unhindered.

docile denny
Reply to  Itch you can't scratch
21, November 2010 3:41 pm

Little concerned here reading this blog. Are you saying that Rachel lives with David Pugh? A council employee living with the leader of the council? I am sorry but have these two got no sense whatsoever. What does it look like to the outside world, no doubt her job is safe and she isn’t one of the 300 under threat. [part of comment removed by moderator].

OAP
Reply to  docile denny
21, November 2010 5:08 pm

Just started reading all this and yes, it is my understanding that David Pugh now lives with Rachel Busby [part of comment removed by moderator].

No.5
Reply to  OAP
21, November 2010 7:37 pm

So What.

docile denny
Reply to  No.5
21, November 2010 7:56 pm

So what? David Pugh takes the moral high ground against others but when it is him it somehow is different. Let’s wait and see the outcome of the next case against him.

No.5
Reply to  No.5
21, November 2010 8:25 pm

Are you saying he’s not allowed to have a girlfriend?

I don’t think its Pugh taking the moral high ground ( if such a thing exists)..its you!

Covert they ass
Reply to  No.5
21, November 2010 9:16 pm

He hasn’t got girlfriend No 5, he has someone elses wife. Now i agree to a point with “so what” but he is arrogant and judgmental over others, he is a christian and it has over tones for his and her employment. She had a paid weeks bed rest didn’t she after the “bust up” A week off that we paid for. So it does matter from… Read more »

OAP
Reply to  No.5
21, November 2010 10:18 pm

What do you mean ‘so what’ No 5?

I can’t make up my mind if you are really as arrogant and self-opinionated as you make yourself out to be or if you do it deliberately for your own amusement.

No.5
Reply to  No.5
21, November 2010 11:08 pm

what the hell difference does it make who Pugh lives with…..all this personality assasination detracts from the real job of getting him out of a job based on his inability to run a council.

I find it demeening that others stoop to levels that they criticize in others

No.5
Reply to  No.5
21, November 2010 11:10 pm

I don’t beleive that this is true…and again, if it is, so what!!!! loads of ‘married’ people live with other people

docile denny
Reply to  No.5
22, November 2010 7:40 am

David Pugh uses the moral highground when it suits him – in other words to get where he wants. He has used it against colleagues to get rid of them. He is a judgemental of others but then does what he condems in others himself. As for what is wrong in living with a married employee of the council, come on No5 HE IS THE LEADER. What… Read more »

No.5
Reply to  OAP
22, November 2010 9:49 am

Then an employment tribunial or standards will get another report.

But you are just guessing this is happening and by slinging moral muck about you are proving yourself as despicable as he is.

The gossip squad are back

Known
18, November 2010 3:42 pm

Congratulations to whomever compiled this report. Hardly a mention of VentnorBlog in there (or at least in what we plebs can read!). Quite a spectacular achievement considering without VB publishing their first story, none of this would have come to light in the first place!

Joan L
19, November 2010 7:31 am

Thanks for such clear reporting. Laying it all open for all to read and understand. The island’s and most other local area’s never seen anything like it.

steve s
19, November 2010 7:38 am

‘…and subsequently posted on an internet video sharing website called “You tube”‘ :-)

Who’s Gazza?!

romeantique
21, November 2010 12:04 pm

This heavily redacted document is no more than the opinion of the Principle Lawyer employed by the Isle of Wight Council. If they paid me what they pay him I would certainly tell them what they want to hear. This whole question is pivotal on whether Pugh was acting as leader of the council during the incident in the car park. He himself consulted the monitoring officer… Read more »

romeantique
Reply to  romeantique
21, November 2010 12:12 pm

Also what was the actual previous case which the legal advise from the Council Officer used to block consideration of the actual swearing incident itself?

The councillors feel it is flawed as it was based on a judgement in another case which has subsequently been criticised.

What is this case?

I now pronounce you…
22, November 2010 8:09 am

So No 5 loads of ‘married people’ live with other people. Are you suggesting that because a sizable numbers of people do something that makes it acceptable maybe even desirable? Numbers cancel responsibilities do they? The mess of divorce and the fall out for all concerned is ok cos….well….lots do it. [part of comment removed by moderator] Having sad that, the context here is also important. Busby… Read more »

No.5
Reply to  I now pronounce you…
22, November 2010 9:45 am

Get over yourself…..thousands of people have second lives very successfully and you have no grounds for your baseless assumptions.

romeantique
Reply to  I now pronounce you…
22, November 2010 11:39 am

Is Pugh a Freemason?

Barney McGrew
Reply to  romeantique
22, November 2010 1:18 pm

No – they wouldn’t have him.

romeantique
22, November 2010 10:29 am

The media management was considered necessary as a damage limitation exercise due to the Council leaders involvement in anti-social behaviour bringing the council into disrepute. Yet we are told David Pugh wasn’t on duty as Council leader. Therefore his actions can bring the Council into disrepute regardless of their claims that he wasn’t on duty. This is inconsistent, as usual they are having their cake and eating… Read more »

Black Dog
22, November 2010 4:35 pm

I have read all your comments about on the matter and find it all very informative. If I were David Pugh I would be very very worried as he is no longer in control of his own destiny, it is his partner Ms. Busby that has the upper hand from here on in. Think about – David Pugh is now and through his own doing is between… Read more »

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined