silohouettes

Who will be the next Leader of the Isle of Wight council? Live coverage

Members of the Isle of Wight full council will be gathering at County Hall from 6pm for their monthly meeting tonight (Wednesday). Follow our live coverage below.

Earlier in the week, the leader and deputy leader resigned from the Executive, along with another executive member, Gordon Kendall who’d only been in the position for a couple of weeks.

Won’t do government’s ‘dirty work’
One month away from the annual budget-setting meeting, the councillors said that “in the face of the unwillingness of Government to lift a finger” their positions were “untenable and, perhaps more pertinently, intolerable”.

It’s expected to be a lively meeting, especially as despite the Island Independent administration still being in place, opposition councillor, Conservative Dave Stewart, offered top step in as ‘caretaker leader’.

Live updates
The live updates that appear below from inside the chamber at County Hall will automatically refresh in the page. However, to see latest comments added to the article, you’ll need to refresh the page. Items in double brackets (()) indicate comment from the author.

If you value the live coverage from OnTheWight, please consider making a donation to our running costs.

Papers for the meeting
There are a number of other items on the agenda for tonight’s meeting, including several motions from opposition councillors.

Papers below have more detail on the various items due to be discussed at the meeting. Click on the full screen icon to see larger versions.

Isel of Wight full council meeting January 2017 Agenda by OnTheWightNews on Scribd

Image: zengei under CC BY 2.0

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
35 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
yjc
18, January 2017 7:53 pm

Councillor Lumley is a disgrace to his Parish/Constituency/Voters

retired hack
Reply to  yjc
18, January 2017 8:00 pm

Councillor Lumley sticks up for democracy and working people.

Simon Haytack
Reply to  retired hack
18, January 2017 8:20 pm

100%

Stewart Blackmore
Reply to  yjc
18, January 2017 9:55 pm

That must be why he gets re-elected every four years, you think?

retired hack
18, January 2017 8:06 pm

Maybe in future all opposition councillors should be removed from the chamber. That’s what Donald Trump would do.

the spy
18, January 2017 8:06 pm

Councillor Lumley says it like it is refuse to leave

the spy
18, January 2017 8:14 pm

video not working

tiki
18, January 2017 8:14 pm

Lumley likes the sound of his own voice. I want to know why Cllr John Howe spent most of the first half playing with his ipad? How much are we paying him? As for Stubbings – you’re not paid to abstain.

Stewart Blackmore
Reply to  tiki
18, January 2017 9:53 pm

Then, in the interests of balance, you’ll want to know why Bob Seely spent so much time on his laptop and phone while at the same time digesting what was going on during the meeting. He only looked up when he spoke and most of what he did say could have been left unsaid.

the spy
18, January 2017 8:24 pm

report him to the standards board pics of him playing on facebook

Potentate
18, January 2017 8:26 pm

Geoff Lumley and some of these independents are making the Island a laughing stock. It’s embarrassing.

What has any of this got to do with the islands problems?

East Cowes
18, January 2017 8:32 pm

I can’t tell what Item 5.4 is on the amendment to paper B, but I can say that John Metcalfe’s comment is just as callous about people with Disabilities. Has he not heard that Disability has been cut and cut, and that it is not just trying to sort out Universal Credit (which doesn’t even exist on the Isle of Wight for Disability yet!!!!)

tiki
18, January 2017 9:36 pm

It’s all very well for Cllr Fuller to suggest we should use the buses but has he every tried to get a bus down to Niton, Newchurch and Brighstone and even some parts of Ryde? If you want people to use the buses reinstate some of the routes and make the services more regular! Bus fares need to be cheaper.

tiki
19, January 2017 8:21 am

I watched he video link last night via IW Radio and it was an eye opener to say the least. I’m just your average punter. Can someone explain to me why Cllr Priest sits and votes with the Cons? I also thought Jones Evans (?) had jumped ship but she was sitting with them and voting with them……..no wonder we get confused. After last night performance I… Read more »

Luisa Hillard
Reply to  tiki
19, January 2017 10:40 am

You will see how chummy Cllrs Priest, Gilbert, Jones-Evans and Chapman are with the Conservatives when they stand unopposed in their wards. Meanwhile they have been part of a Tory-UKIP alliance for at least a year. Don’t forget that Cllr Priest was fired from the Executive (and resigned from the Indie group) because of his alleged Con dealings. The old news stories should be easy to find.… Read more »

Geoff Lumley
19, January 2017 10:30 am

Usually the Ruling Group sits on one side and ALL opposition members the other. However, in 2014 Priest, Gilbey, and Blezzard all crossed the chamber to join the opposition (Jones-Evans never had to move when she decided to pretend not to be a Tory anymore). When the Tory/Ukip/new-Indys started to work together early last year, Labour and Reg Barry decided to move over with the IW Indys,… Read more »

Luisa Hillard
Reply to  Geoff Lumley
19, January 2017 10:46 am

Geoff, please don’t call the IMG members ‘independent’ or ‘Indy’. They aren’t and it’s embarrassing for those of us who are, as well as confusing to residents. Please call them Individual Members, which is their own name and distinguishes them from us.

seriously!
Reply to  Luisa Hillard
19, January 2017 10:56 am

Please explain the difference between an independent member & an individual member.

ErnestCitizen
Reply to  seriously!
19, January 2017 11:07 am

Both types of Councillor campaigned and were elected as being independent of a political party.

However the members of the breakaway Individual Members Group (!) have since aligned themselves and vote with the Conservative Party.

Vote for one thing, get another.

steve stubbings
Reply to  seriously!
19, January 2017 11:12 am

Except for Councillor Jones Evans who, having been elected as a Tory, now leads the Individual Members Group and votes with the Tories?! The ‘Individual members’, on the whole, are disaffected former members of other groups. Some of them may, for example, have failed in an attempt to take over the group of which they were once a member by conspiring with others outside that group. ‘Independent… Read more »

retired hack
Reply to  steve stubbings
19, January 2017 11:18 am

JJE’s resignation letter from the Tories was a very curious one. It managed to blame the Independent administration for her decision. It was almost as though it had been written by someone else…

ErnestCitizen
Reply to  steve stubbings
19, January 2017 11:41 am

Ah yes, apologies – it is hard to keep track. It is a great shame that party politics have any place in local government. I was appalled but not surprised to witness the vicious tirade from Cllr Whitehouse aimed at the outgoing administration during the debate where you were meant to be speaking in favour of a nominee. Once again it showed how much of a good… Read more »

retired hack
Reply to  seriously!
19, January 2017 11:34 am

Luisa has just explained it perfectly clearly. There are always some folk who don’t want to understand.

Luisa Hillard
Reply to  seriously!
19, January 2017 11:39 am

The difference is that they are two distinct political groups. One of which is pro-austerity and in a long-term political alliance with Conservatives and UKIP. The other isn’t.

Individual Members Group (IMG)
Island Independent Group. (Independents/Indies)

Geoff Lumley
Reply to  Luisa Hillard
19, January 2017 11:46 am

And of the political parties:

Tory and Ukip (and one LibDem, Cllr Blezzard) – pro-austerity

Labour and one LibDem, Cllr Barry – anti-austerity

Potentate
Reply to  Luisa Hillard
19, January 2017 11:55 am

Doesn’t Luisa openly supports the Green’s? Councillor Fuller even stood as s green too.

At least two or three are actually Labour.

The antics last night were shaming.

m coakley
19, January 2017 11:30 am

Sadly I can be criticised as not being aligned to any political party and make decisions on various local and national issues. However looking at these reports our elected representatives are behaving like ferrets fighting in a sack. Disruptive behaviour is a big educational issue and if these people were students they would be looking at temporary or permanent exclusion. How can any authority continue like this?… Read more »

Luisa Hillard
Reply to  m coakley
19, January 2017 11:47 am

Any of them? There was only a minority of councillors misbehaving. One of which was Cllr “I’m a business man in Ventnor” Perks (UKIP) who threatened to beat up Cllr Lumley (Labour). Cllr Whitehouse was his usual self and even his own leader appeared to intervene and tell him to dial down his abuse. Cllr Lumley excelled himself in getting the Police called to escort him from… Read more »

steve stubbings
Reply to  Luisa Hillard
19, January 2017 11:55 am

Nobody heckles an ineffective chairman better than Geoff. He’s turned it into a form of theatre.

ErnestCitizen
Reply to  steve stubbings
19, January 2017 11:58 am

Kudos to Steve for walking out in solidarity with Geoff!

ErnestCitizen
Reply to  Luisa Hillard
19, January 2017 11:56 am

But Geoff was not unreasonable – the chairman lost control of the meeting early on.

He is not fit to be chairman and it was a disgrace that he took the second term despite convention. He does not act in an independent way at all.

He took a stand and I for one salute him for it.

Ali Hayden.
19, January 2017 12:10 pm

It is easy to see why so many don’t bother to vote in elections. Party Politics should have no place whatsoever at Local Council level. This sort of behaviour has been allowed in the council chamber for the past 3+ a half years. Verbal abuse, name calling + back stabbing have all become ‘normal’ practice for certain members of the council. Some more interested in their own… Read more »

m coakley
19, January 2017 12:13 pm

Sorry Luisa but you are part of this childish “he said” she said” “he did” scenario.
Reading the reports there was little reasonable debate unless none of you can identify what is and what is not reasonable.