ryde schol boarding plans

Ryde School planning application has just been rejected (Update 4)

The application by Ryde school to build a new boarding accommodation building has been rejected by the Isle of Wight council Planning Committee.

In a vote of six against, with two supportive, the reason given for the rejection, was that it was not in keeping with the Conservation area.

In the previous weeks, the school had put their case for the development and residents had aired their objections, stating that Ryde School Boarding House proposal ‘should not go ahead’.

Isle of Wight council planning officer, Russell Chick, presented the detail to the councillors.

Speaker objecting
Mr Goodwin presented his objections.

In summary: Impact will be significant. Conservation area. Modern appearance, like a hotel, will not enhance the area. Not residential in appearance. Not shielded by tree cover from the public realm. Will dominate the skyline and noticeable from Ryde Pier. Perspective in winter and summer very different. Not in accordance with conservation criteria. Visually intrusive and loss of privacy.

He then ran out of his allotted time.

The school’s spokesperson
Agent, Martha James, spoke on behalf of Ryde School:

Needed in order to remain competitive for boarders at the school. Helps to keep the fees as low as possible for Island families. Bring £2.5m to the economy that goes to businesses and wages. School happy to provide trees along boundary. Does not want to cut down trees. Closest to house is 42m distance. Traffic will be reduced if pupils able to board on the site.

Ryde councillors speak against
Both Cllr Jim Moody and Cllr Axford spoke in objection.

Overlooking is an issue for residents. Noise concerns – large number of youngsters on site in the evenings will result in more noise than usual. Summer school – not subject to same discipline as strict school structure. Ask for three stories to be reduced to two stories.

Cllr questions design
Cllr Brodie said he felt the three storey building would be significant, referring to DM2 – the need for high quality build.

He asked:

Which skilled designers have been involved in designing nothing less than a carbuncle on the hill of one of the premiere towns on the Island?

The planning officer replied that applicants have been through pre/planning advice and it was designed by RIBA architect.

Further Cllr objections
Other councillors raised questions on the design, suggesting it didn’t fit it – in particular in a Conservation area, with others asking if perhaps planting could be included to soften the look.

Planning officer replied saying that the officers had set out their reasoning as to why the development would enhance and in accordance with conservation area.

The vote
Cllr Beston moved for the proposal to be accepted and Chairman seconds. Motion fell with only two for and six against.

Cllr Brodie moved for refusal citing DM2 of Island plan with reference to para 1661 National framework. This was seconded by Cllr Brian Tyndall.

Cllr Brodie said the design is the problem, saying DM2 is there to be used. He said he had serious concerns about this and the past decisions, labeling it a carbuncle.

Wendy Perera (Head of Planning) asked for clarification of the reason for refusal – “by virtue of design, the application fails to enhance character of conservation area”. Asking of the Councillors were happy to delegate final wording to officers?

The vote to refuse is carried six in favour and two abstentions.

RABH: “Far too many fundamental errors”
Following the meeting, the Ryde Against Boarding House (RABH) group said,

“All the members of RABH are delighted at the result from the Council Planning mtg tonight. It was a shame it had to get this far, but the committee members realised there were far too many fundamental errors with this scheme.

“Let’s hope Ryde School takes a completely different path now, one which benefits and enhances Ryde and has the support of the residents.”

More details?
Full details of the arguments made for and against can be read in OnTheWight‘s live coverage of the planning meeting (that is still ongoing.)

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
6 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
electrickery
2, August 2017 12:24 pm

What would have happened if this one had been left to the sole discretion of Ms Perera?

Now we wait to see whether IWC will capitulate under threat of appeal costs.

lardi
2, August 2017 5:06 pm

Why is it that when an architect designs a contemporary building they too often resort to “boxes” with no real attempt at interest or inventiveness in the shape and the street view.

electrickery
Reply to  lardi
2, August 2017 5:53 pm

Interest and inventiveness (aka arrogance and vanity) led us to the horrors of the Shard, the Gherkin and the Pompidou Centre. We might almost be grateful…

Caconym
Reply to  electrickery
2, August 2017 6:48 pm

Are you kidding?

Those are awesome buildings.

mikebat
11, August 2017 12:20 pm

Strange how the two members of the planning committee pushing this for approval live in Shanklin which is about 12 Kilometres away. Don’t suppose they would hear all the noise coming from the 70 boarders or have to look at the awful building as they opened their bedroom curtains in the morning

harry0
11, August 2017 2:33 pm

Not that strange. Cllr. Michael Beston runs a hotel in Shanklin and Cllr. Chris Quirk used to run a hotel in Shanklin, but managed to get planning permission to turn it into flats about 5 years ago. Of course, they would have far more knowledge about putting up an ugly building in a conservation area, than the local members who were very much against it!

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined