Second Place For Island Leigh In Extreme Racing Series

Thanks to Suzanne and Alan Whitewood for news of Island sailor Leigh McMillan. In their own words. Ed

Leigh McMillan © WhitewoodIsland sailor Leigh McMillan has just completed the first round (Act 1) of the Extreme Sailing Series 2012 which has taken place in Oman.

It was Leigh McMillan and his crew on ‘The Wave, Muscat’ who scored first blood in the first race on day one. Conditions were not challenging with the breeze ranging from six-ten knots throughout the afternoon and it wasn’t long before Pennec’s team, ‘Groupe Edmond de Rothschild’, took control to win the next two races.

Man overboard
Race Four delivered the drama of the day when fifth crew member Max Bulger on board ‘Oman Air’ went over the side.

‘Team Trifork,’ a new team from Denmark was finally unveiled at the start of the competition as the 8th team in the starting blocks in Muscat, Oman. This team will be co-skippered by Jes Gram–Hansen on helm and Rasmus Kostner.

“Challenging for overall victory”
Before the first race Leigh McMillan, skipper, ‘The Wave, Muscat’ said, “I think we’re in pretty good shape and we’ve done some good training races but we haven’t raced in anger against any of these guys yet. We hope to get on the podium and start the season well. I think on paper ‘Groupe Edmond de Rothschild’ may be favourites but we hope that by the time we get to the end of the season we’ll be challenging for overall victory.”

American Morgan Larson, new skipper of ‘Oman Air’, had an incredible start to his Extreme Sailing Series career on the opening day which resulted in ‘Oman Air ‘sharing the top of the leaderboard after six races alongside pre-season favourites ‘Groupe Edmond de Rothschild’.

Day two
It was a game of cat and mouse on day two when Morgan Larson, continued his impressive form to keep the pressure fully on the all-French team ‘Groupe Edmond de Rothschild’. ‘Oman Air’ won the first race of day, the French team the next two, then another ‘Oman Air ‘victory.

These two teams traded places at the top of the leaderboard, throughout the day. Now only separated by one point it was not until the fifth race of the day by which time the breeze was starting to go light, that another team got a look in, Leigh McMillan and his team on ‘The Wave, Muscat’.

By the end of day two results were – First: ‘Groupe Edmond de Rothschild’ (FRA/ Pierre Pennec) 85 points. Second: ‘Oman Air’ (OMA/ Morgan Larson) 84 points. Third: ‘The Wave, Muscat’ (OMA /Leigh McMillan) 72 points.

Leigh McMillan said after maintaining his team’s third position on the leaderboard, “We managed to keep it quite clean. We only got one penalty today – we got too close to Red Bull and took a penalty but that’s what the racing was like today. We’re getting into a good place and we’re hoping to go out tomorrow and finish it off.”

Day three
On the final day there were massive Omani celebrations in Muscat as ‘Oman Air’ and ‘The Wave, Muscat’ score a one-two, squeezing out the French team of ‘Groupe Edmond de Rothschild’ who had finished every day but the last on top.

This saw Morgan Larson’s team on ‘Oman Air’ triumph in their debut. Four teams were in contention for the podium going into the final double-points race – the new Danish entry, ‘Team Trifork’, won that race, but ‘Oman Air’ did enough to secure victory after an intense battle with the favourites. Leigh McMillan’s team on ‘The Wave, Muscat ‘ who muscled into the two-way fight and raced brilliantly on the final day to finish second overall ahead of ‘Groupe Edmond de Rothschild’.

Final results
First: Oman Air (OMA) Morgan Larson / Will Howden / Charlie Ogletree, Nasser Al Mashari, Max Bulger 165 points.

Second: The Wave, Muscat (OMA) Leigh McMillan, Ed Smyth, Pete Greenhalgh, Hashim Al Rashdi, Rachel Williamson 159 points.

Third: Groupe Edmond de Rothschild (FRA) Pierre Pennec / Jean-Christophe Mourniac / Herve Cunningham / Bernard Labro / Adeline Chatenet 155 points.

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
0 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bystander
12, March 2013 1:44 pm

The best way to improve the safety of pedestrians is to stop cyclists sharing paths. I fail to see how a Council, whose plans to reduce its adult social care budget ignored its own internal guidance and were unlawful, can consider itself in a position to judge the safety of anything.

Steve Goodman
Reply to  Bystander
12, March 2013 4:27 pm

Is “the best way to improve the safety of pedestrians to stop cyclists sharing paths”, or would it be to stop the sharing of highways with motor vehicles which kill and injure so many more people? Or for everybody to use shared spaces considerately? There are positive, inclusive signs to that effect on part of the National Cycle Network south of Newport; but now on the same… Read more »

Bystander
Reply to  Steve Goodman
12, March 2013 5:01 pm

I saw a friend of mine hit by a cycle doing 20 mph on a shared path, she lay unconscious in a puddle of her own urine after that. Bikes are a menace because of the number of irresponsible cyclists, on paths and on roads.

a person
Reply to  Steve Goodman
12, March 2013 6:07 pm

Well said Steve Goodman. I am often amazed at the level of abuse I receive when on cycle paths. It astounds me that pedestrians feel that they can block the entire pathway and not give any courtesy to bike users. I have been sworn at and told to “get off the f***ing bike” on more than one occasion. When I politely point out that it is actually… Read more »

Bystander
Reply to  a person
12, March 2013 6:36 pm

To be fair the people swearing at you might well have had nothing to do with you being a cyclist.
The ‘idiots walking’, as you describe them, just happen to have priority on a shared path if it is a public right of way.

a person
Reply to  Bystander
12, March 2013 7:20 pm

so someone telling me to “get off the f***ing bike” on a cycle path is not swearing at me because Im a cyclist then? How do you work that one out? And quite how pedestrians can have right of way on a designated cycle path NOT a shared path is beyond me. It is incumbent on BOTH cyclists and pedestrians to know what is going on at… Read more »

tryme
Reply to  Bystander
12, March 2013 7:31 pm

Enjoy your right of way, mowing people down, ‘a person’ – good luck with that.

The rest of us live in the real world where neither pedestrian nor cyclist can be relied upon to behave perfectly, & we think we should plan for that.

a person
Reply to  Bystander
12, March 2013 7:46 pm

Im sorry, that is EXACTLY what I have just said.
“EVERYONE should be aware of what is going on around them and make sure they take extra care to avoid accidents. Cyclists, Pedestrians, EVERYONE.”

NOWHERE did I mention mowing down pedestrians.

Perhaps you should read what people actually write instead of just trying to rile them. Grow up.

a person
Reply to  Bystander
12, March 2013 7:50 pm

and the right of way – you seem to be under the illusion that I am talking about an IOW shared path. when I mention a right of way for cyclists, I am talking about a path on the mainland with a sign that SPECIFICALLY says cyclists have the right of way. It is NOT a shared path, yet pedestrians use it and seem to think they… Read more »

Bystander
Reply to  Bystander
12, March 2013 7:54 pm

So it was my friends fault? You are a typical cyclist John and I’m not going to waste any further time on your childish comments

tryme
Reply to  Bystander
12, March 2013 7:56 pm

If you ride anything like you post, ‘a person’, you are one scary cyclist!

a person
Reply to  Bystander
12, March 2013 8:36 pm

where did i say it was your friends fault? YOU have blamed the cyclist throughout. I have said that both your friend and the cyclist could have done things differently and been more aware on a shared path. I really dont see what is “childish” about suggesting that people using a shared path should make sure that they are aware of what is going on around them… Read more »

a person
Reply to  Bystander
12, March 2013 8:42 pm

I also notice that 3 times now you have not answered the question: where you and your group taking up the entire SHARED path, leaving no room for cyclists to pass safely? I think perhaps your lack of response on that is telling. Whilst I have the utmost sympathy for your friend, it is a SHARED path, and ALL parties should be aware of that. Too often… Read more »

DH
Reply to  Steve Goodman
12, March 2013 7:43 pm
tryme
12, March 2013 6:43 pm

It seems common sense to me. If you compare the effect of a nuisance pedestrian on a cyclist, with the effect of a nuisance cyclist on a pedestrian, it is the cyclist who has the ‘weapon’ of the bike & can usually do far more damage. Bikes can whip round at you out of the blue, as seems to have happened in Bystander’s example. Never mind the… Read more »

tryme
Reply to  tryme
12, March 2013 6:58 pm

I agree that on general roads the boot is on the other foot, & it is incumbent for cars to be thoughtful towards cyclists & give them priority. This is what I do with cyclists & horses, giving them masses of room & not behaving in a hassling way.

Bystander
Reply to  tryme
12, March 2013 7:02 pm

In the instance I was referring to my friend was walking along talking to her companion when she dropped something, she stooped down to her left side to pick it up as a bike approached her from behind. He had intended to pass her at speed with less than a foot clearance. This happens to me regularly on footpaths, you dont even know they are coming until… Read more »

playingthenumbers
12, March 2013 11:07 pm

Being a multimodal traveller, I’ve learnt to suspect other users of the road, path, whatever as potential pillocks. Never underestimating the stupidity, ignorance & foolhardiness of some people. Whether they are walking their dogs along the Cowes – Newport cycle path with their iPods turned up to max, unhearing of warning bells while their dogs gamble freely & unleashed wherever the scent takes them, unaware that although… Read more »

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined