undercliff drive november 2016
Road rebuilt inland by Island Roads (volunteer road to the right)

Undercliff Drive: Life is anything but ‘back to normal’ for some residents

It’s been a while since OnTheWight has reported about the long-running Undercliff Drive saga, so you might be mistaken for thinking that everything was all hunky-dory and tickety-boo down in deepest darkest St Lawrence.

Sadly for those who went through what was often described as a “living hell”, it appears to be anything but back to normal.

Damning LGO report
In April 2017, a damning report by the Local Government Ombudsman (LGO) found that the Isle of Wight Council’s actions and delays following the February 2014 landslip on two sections of Undercliff Drive, “caused significant disruption to lives, financial loss, and stress”.

So it was shocking to hear that for those living in the affected area between Ventnor and Niton, life has still not gone back to normal, following the many years of stress.

Smedmore: “Most stressful time of my life”
Gary Smedmore, of the Undercliff Glen Caravan Park, told OnTheWight it would be a gross understatement if he said the last four years “have been the most stressful” in his life.

Not only has he had a massive loss of earnings, but has had to outlay costs over those last four years too, with long-running battles over council tax, utilities, business rates and all the while, not being able to operate his business.

Gary told us that he can’t open his caravan park, or even start work on renovations and repairs until he’s seen the official safety report for the ‘temporary’ road from the west that was built by Island Roads between September 2016 and February 2017.

He said he and the other residents have had no official notice from the council stating the road is open and safe to use.

Other concerns and issues
Putting aside the apparent difficulties that might raise, there have been a plethora of other concerns and issues raised with OnTheWight by residents.

The signage – or lack of it – at the Niton end apparently results in dozens of cars driving down the dead end road, only to have to turn around and head back the way they came from when they realise they can go no further. Often, we’re told by one resident, screeching off in anger.

Spot the signage, if you can
Lack of signage

The fact that the road is still showing as open on Sat Navs isn’t helping, but residents say the signage needs to be far clearer at the Niton end.

One resident counted 52 cars turning round in the time it took her to trim the garden hedge one day.

Blocked turning head
The turning head, that was created to allow drivers to turn round had they failed to see the dead end signs at Niton, was, for some time the resting place for a traveller, who decided he rather liked the idyllic woodland spot and thought he’d stay a while.

A resident has told us that at one point a man even set up a drum kit in the turning head, so he could practice without disturbing his neighbours.

Perhaps he was unaware that around the next corner there were families living in the once landlocked homes. It’s highly possible that he hadn’t considered the wildlife in the SSSI area either.

Near collision?
This car below – which was left on the access road with one wheel over the edge – appeared to have swerved to avoid another car coming round the single track carriageway on the blind bend. Although it was removed the following day, it remained in this position overnight.

land rover over edge 640

These are just a small handful of some of the issues that have come up over the last 18 months.

Public meeting
Back in February 2017, Leader of the Isle of Wight council, Cllr Dave Stewart, said he would get Undercliff Drive open again as a through road. Over a year later and according to residents, several options are being looked it.

A public meeting is being held on Saturday 9th June at Niton Village Hall between 2-4pm where Cllr Stewart, who is also the ward councillor for Niton, Whitwell and Chale will be updating residents on the latest news.

Image: Access road to properties on Undercliff Drive November 2016

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
7 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
James Luke
3, January 2013 3:30 pm

The 300 objections to this proposal should be taken seriously. I have learned the hard way how upsetting this type of planning dispute can be. I personally took little interest in the wind turbine debate as it didn’t impact me. However, when I realised that I would be impacted by the asphalt plant I took more of an interest and have been totally shocked by the whole… Read more »

martin william wareham
3, January 2013 7:59 pm

My only objection to this application is the height of the Turbine.This one is far to small it should be at least one hundred metres thus any ground noise created would be less.

Stewart Blackmore
3, January 2013 8:24 pm

At both the Cheverton and Wellow planning committees the Councillors said that they felt that they should vote in line with Planning Officers’ recommendations, ergo this application should be approved. James mentions that there are more than 300 objections ‘against’, but it must be remembered just how well resourced and organised ThWART are in its dogged resistance to any wind turbines on the Island. As is usual,… Read more »

tryme
Reply to  Stewart Blackmore
3, January 2013 9:05 pm

I don’t think it tells us about the support for any local, specific turbine application, to tell us some national statistic. ( And I would want to know the context & detail of any such survey). Perhaps there’s a reason ThWART is “well resourced & organised”, (if that is the case): like, they get a lot of support here! Good for them. I daresay there are influential… Read more »

James Luke
Reply to  Stewart Blackmore
3, January 2013 9:25 pm

Stewart – 6 months ago I would have been one of the 83%! Even now I can’t say that I have an informed view on wind farms as I have not researched and do not understand the issues. My experience with the asphalt application is that objectors are far from well resourced and organised when compared to major multi-nationals supported by planning consultants, lawyers and PR departments.… Read more »

tryme
Reply to  Stewart Blackmore
3, January 2013 10:40 pm

Presumably Stewart Blackmore would hold ThWART’s views in high esteem if it were poverty stricken & disorganised, (strange to find that being organised’s an offence). Or then again, would he then be glad to steamroller over it. Difficult to say, isn’t it….

greenfiremouse
Reply to  Stewart Blackmore
3, January 2013 10:41 pm

Let’s face it: The people behind ThWART and similar organisations have massive business interests in other aspects of the energy market, and not only in the UK.

tryme
Reply to  greenfiremouse
3, January 2013 10:50 pm

‘Let’s face it’, people don’t want wind turbines disfiguring their lives in the various ways they can do….. And when you are up against powerful interests supporting turbines, you need people behind you who understand their world.

Stewart Blackmore
Reply to  tryme
3, January 2013 11:05 pm

Tryme, The figure of 83% is well documented elsewhere, whether you choose to believe it or not. I do not hold ThWART’S position in any kind of esteem given the record of those who founded it. Its connections to the Conservatives is also well documented and, despite the past protestations of Messrs Pugh & Brown, it has the ear of the ruling group at County Hall. Mr… Read more »

tryme
Reply to  Stewart Blackmore
4, January 2013 9:57 am

One of my points about the 83% is that it’s a national figure, not a local one, Stewart Blackmore. You’re probably not in a position to say that all those who oppose turbines on the Island have a commercial interest in it – not me for one. Incidentally, just because people have put their money where their mouth & belief is, does not mean we should be… Read more »

downwind resident
3, January 2013 9:50 pm

With the three minutes only to speak at the Planning Committee shared between all the objectors and no right to reply the system is somewhat skewed.

Will the Environmental Health Department be allowed to attend this Planning Committee and speak?

We didn’t see them in attendance at the Isle of Wight Grain Storage Biomass Boiler Planning Committee!

tryme
Reply to  downwind resident
4, January 2013 10:02 am

…As I was saying (!), speaking of ThWART as though there are no dubious goings-on amongst supporters of turbines, is reducing what should be rational argument to a case of who can smear each others’ motives most effectively. Take note of James Luke’s experiences….

Black Dog
4, January 2013 2:25 am

IOW Council officers and members of the planning committee please note:

“Planners must not ignore local communities who oppose windfarms, warns minister Nick Boles”

Source: Daily Mail 04.01.13

D.s
7, January 2013 2:22 pm

I am so fed up with you people now. The very reason franking is on the horizon is because we won’t move on and start THINKING ABOUT OUR FUTURE AND OUR CHILDRENS FUTURE. But no you all worry about your pretty view of our (unspoilt natural countryside). Take a look on Google earth at the island. There is nothing natural about the island landscape. SORT IT OUT… Read more »

Cynic
Reply to  D.s
7, January 2013 7:52 pm

@D ” The very reason franking is on the horizon is because we won’t move on ”

The Franks are already here with the French government’s owning EDF! :-))##Presumably you mean “fracking”?

D.s
Reply to  Cynic
7, January 2013 10:28 pm

Yeah fracking auto correct on my phone buggered up again. Reading back I think I may have been in a bit of a bad mood :-P

tryme
Reply to  D.s
7, January 2013 8:44 pm

That hectoring tone only detracts from anything you may have to say, D.s…..

No.5
7, January 2013 7:05 pm

Change of heart…refused due to noise issues…despite nearest estblishments being working farms

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined