Studio School interior

Letter: Politicians need to ‘step forward with urgency’ to save Studio School

We always welcome a Letter to the Editor to share with our readers – unsurprisingly they don’t always reflect the views of this publication. If you have something you’d like to share, get in touch and of course, your considered comments are welcome below. This from Vix Lowthion, the National Education Spokesperson (Green Party). Ed


“We are devastated…immensely disappointed…saddened… it will be a big mistake!”

Parents across the Isle of Wight are reeling a week after the announcement that the Island’s Studio School is threatened by closure in 2019.

On an Island which remains significantly below average nationally in terms of GCSE results, social mobility and wages – it is scandalous that the Department for Education are considering closing the door on a centre of excellence for skills building and employment opportunities in a deprived coastal community.

A decade of headlines
The Isle of Wight keeps hitting national headlines when it comes to its schools. The last decade has seen major reorganisation of education on the Island, as local and national government press on with initiatives to overturn years of poor attainment.

This has involved the closure of all its middle schools, a new Church secondary school, a new Free School, and the threatened closure of two high schools – including academy trust AET dropping its sponsorship of Sandown Bay Academy (now taken into Local Authority control by extending a nearby primary to being an all-through school).

Ex- OFSTED chair David Hoare described it as a ‘ghetto island’ in 2016 on which poor educational standards were damaging the prospects of the young people – and he was forced to resign.

Massive cuts in funding
Schools on the Island are facing a massive £3.9 million of government cuts by 2020, and are the third worst local authority in the country for staff cuts – losing an average of 16.6 teachers per secondary school.

It is no coincidence that the Isle of Wight also has the highest proportion of home-educated pupils in England and Wales (almost one in 50). Parents have reported struggling to find suitable education for their children who they feel are being ‘lost’ in a system which focuses heavily on results and less on skills setting them up for life in employment.

A fresh approach
The establishment of the Studio School in East Cowes in 2014 offered a fresh approach to a school system with an innovative vocational and academic curriculum, dedicated to addressing the gap between schools and employment, with weekly opportunities to get into the world of work.

Originally a 14-19 school, it has been operating successfully for 14-16 year olds, before many of them choose to extend their studies at a larger sixth form or gain an apprenticeships in local businesses.

Parents: Studio School a “life saver”
Parents are clear that the school should not close.

“Sending my son here was quite literally a life saver.”

Another parent continues:

“Surely a school that gets our kids ‘work ready’, teaching them valuable employability skills, interpersonal and communication skills, and prepares them practically and emotionally for interviews and further challenges can only be a positive asset to our Island community.”

Parents dispute unviability claims
However, the Inspire Academy Trust, based in Southampton who sponsor the school, state that the smaller school numbers make it financial unviable in the longer term – a claim that parents dispute.

It’s been suggested the school could admit younger students in Year 9, or offer a distinct Careers diploma in Years 12 & 13.

Good GCSE results
Up to twenty Studio Schools across the country have been forced to close (with a huge collective cost of £48 million) due to a lack of parental support or failure to improve standards of behaviour and attainment – but this is not the case on the Isle of Wight.

Results at GCSE for the Island Studio School hit the national average – a boost for the Island which struggles with exam achievement. And the school’s parents are unusually very vocal in their support for the staff, led by Head teacher Richard White.

Laura, whose daughter attends the school, says

“Mr White and his fantastic team of teachers and other staff are a credit to the Isle of Wight education… closing the Studio School will be a big mistake and a great loss.”

Provisional agreement from DfE
The Inspire Academy Trust requested to close the school last month, which has been provisionally agreed by the Department for Education.

But this is subject to a four week listening period (ending on 22nd May) – all parents, organisations and residents are urged to make their comments known to DFE.IOWSS@education.gov.uk or the Regional Schools Commissioner Dominic Herrington at rsc.sesl@education.gov.uk or visit Save Our Studio School Facebook Page to help us build the campaign.

Range of schools required
Good, quality education requires a range of schools which meet the diverse needs of our young people.

Purely a focus on academic studies does not suit all teenagers, many of which are mature beyond their years and itching to get out into the world of work.

Closure a “bizarre decision”
The future of education on our Island needs accountable schools, run locally, meeting the varied needs of our children.

To close a new school with such vocal parental support, before it’s barely got into its stride, is a bizarre decision made by people off the Island who are unaware of the impact the school is making in our community.

Politicians needs to “step up”
Those local and national politicians who make speeches about social mobility, improving standards and increasing opportunities for young people outside of the classroom, really must step forward with urgency, put these words into action and join us to fight to Keep Our Studio School on the Isle of Wight.

See the Save Our Studio School Facebook Page for more information.

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
6 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
henry
21, January 2021 4:26 pm

Hahaha, can’t you tell an election is coming ;-)

Colin
21, January 2021 4:36 pm

Much as I would like to see the railways put back to how they were before the Beeching axe in the sixties, I am realistic enough to know that it will never happen. Why? because it is economically unviable for starters. And for seconds, the rail route has been built on in various places. Electioneering again from the tories who couldn’t run a Dotto train let alone… Read more »

peter1
21, January 2021 5:14 pm

Why wouldn’t the steam railway co-operate? Extended rail services right through to Ryde Pierhead.
But I thought the closed track was sold off to make it almost impossible to reinstate. Here’s a thought; extend to Cowes, at least Mill Hill Station!

Tim
Reply to  peter1
21, January 2021 5:55 pm

To avoid tourists getting electrocuted by the third rail and avoid having to upgrade their signaling and rolling stock to national network standards!

wellsm
Reply to  Tim
21, January 2021 11:55 pm

The Class 483 trains can be built to use batteries, the third rail does not have to be a barrier.

Tim
Reply to  wellsm
22, January 2021 8:38 am

Even without the third rail the upgrades required would finish off the steam railway operations.

neilpalmer400
Reply to  wellsm
22, January 2021 11:11 pm

That’s a key point. The section from Smallbrook Jn to Wootton could easily be covered by 483’s with a battery pack (and if really necessary could be run non-stop Smallbrook to Wootton at 25mph due to light rail regulations). Most of the right of way from Wootton to the edge of Newport seems to be mostly clear (a section of new track/route at the end to maybe… Read more »

Tim
21, January 2021 5:53 pm

Bring back the No.39 bus instead!

railwayphil
21, January 2021 7:49 pm

The IOWSR has a Light Railway Order limiting operations to 25mph. Once this speed is exceeded, full National Safety Standards are required plus massive track and signalling investment ro satisfy these Standards. There is no capacity for around 175 days a year with heritage services running between say 10am and 6pm. So a regular main line service would either reduce the steam services to an unviable level… Read more »

wellsm
Reply to  railwayphil
21, January 2021 11:54 pm

Where there is a will there is often a way and one would think that extending back to Newport would relieve a great deal of traffic on the road between there and Ryde. I have been a member of IOWSR for many years and I would look forward to a sharing arrangement if a way can be found. Too often people rush in to say this and… Read more »

wellsm
Reply to  wellsm
21, January 2021 11:58 pm

Also, there is no reason why trains could not continue to run under an LRO if that made the project feasible economically. There is no need for an HST!

Highwayman
21, January 2021 9:01 pm

Being part of the “wealth of knowledge and skill on the Island”, I was phoned by a professional contact employed by a national consultancy that was thinking of bidding to do the feasibility study. After speaking to me, they quickly decided not to. It sounds like a nice idea, but it’s completely unrealistic, for all the reasons already put forward. I can’t understand why IWC should spend… Read more »

wellsm
Reply to  Highwayman
22, January 2021 12:00 am

What a shame that you would go so far as to put a potential contractor off, the benefits of getting traffic off the roads would be substantial.

Highwayman
Reply to  wellsm
23, January 2021 12:32 am

That’s not entirely fair – I certainly don’t dispute the benefits of getting traffic off the roads. If I thought there was any realistic possibility of this study achieving it, I would have agreed to help (which is what my contact had phoned me to ask) and picked up some useful fees from doing so. It would be lovely to see the lines reinsated, but I have… Read more »

Tim
Reply to  Highwayman
22, January 2021 8:40 am

Its the transport board trying to deflect discussions away from taboo subjects!

Snowwolf1
Reply to  Highwayman
22, January 2021 11:37 am

Obviously to justify the hike in Council tax they tend to impose or try to impose this year. All this means is more money being wasted on “Consultations” at a massive price and nothing to show at the end or they will end up supplying something that doesn’t work – like the floating bridge!

planespeaker
22, January 2021 8:14 am

When the combined might of the MP and Council is unable to provide a reliable way of crossing the River Medina between East and West Cowes, how on God’s earth do they think they can restore even the tiniest part of the Islands railway system?

walkingwizard
22, January 2021 9:17 am

The extension of the railway will remove cycle tracks that the council had been trying to get us to use. Use the consultants cash to improve the poor standard of the existing cycle paths.

hialtitude
Reply to  walkingwizard
22, January 2021 11:17 am

Yep, the section of cycle track between Wootton and Island Harbour is only suitable for those with mountain bikes and life jackets.

Generally the cycle paths on the Island suck big time.

Snowwolf1
22, January 2021 11:34 am

Too little too late to a certain extent. The cost alone would be astronomical due to infrastructure such as bridges being removed, tracks built over – they should never have ended the rail network on the Island this in itself would have been our greatest attraction for tourists the film industry, documentaries and keeping skills going even more so it they trains remained steam.

aeroscale
22, January 2021 9:59 pm

Losing access to the permanent way was arguably the most short-sighted decision ever on the Island, making this undoubtedly the biggest and most costly project here in living memory – but it simply needs to be done. Future generations will thank those who provide an alternative to ever-increasing road usage and, even in the short term, there will be a huge boost to local economy in the… Read more »

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined