Potential of farmland still ignored in rural housing crisis, says CLA

The CLA, which represents landowners, farmers and rural businesses, said that if Rural Exception Sites are not used to their full potential there is little hope of solving the acute shortage of rural housing.

Isle of Wight Countryside :

Michael shares this latest news on behalf of the County Land and Business Association. Ed

Fewer affordable homes are being built in villages because local authorities are continuing to ignore the potential of developing farmland, according to the CLA.

New government data shows that despite a 17% increase in the total number of affordable homes built in small rural communities across England last year, 143 fewer homes were built on Rural Exception Sites, land which is not usually granted planning permission but where affordable development is allowed.

The CLA, which represents landowners, farmers and rural businesses, said that if Rural Exception Sites are not used to their full potential there is little hope of solving the acute shortage of rural housing.

CLA President Tim Breitmeyer said:

“Rural Exception Sites are a key means of providing affordable homes in rural areas where a landowner provides land at below market value to build affordable homes for local people.

“However, the latest figures show how drastically underused they are. Our own report into making villages sustainable for the future set out ways to ensure local authorities use all the mechanisms available to deliver new rural affordable homes.

“They must be proactive in order to breathe new life into our rural communities and help to solve the rural housing crisis.”

Call to Government
To encourage the building of much needed affordable homes in rural areas, the CLA has called on the Government and local authorities to:

  1. Change sustainability criteria for rural settlements from an assessment of services the community has, to what it needs

    This outdated assessment of the facilities and services that a rural settlement needs rarely takes into account broadband as important when considering areas for development. One step to achieving this change is to make housing needs assessments mandatory.

  2. Allow cross subsidy on Entry Level Exception Sites

    Allowing a small amount of open market housing on these sites ensures viability for the landowner so that sites can be bought forward and developed.

  3. Exempt properties provided as affordable homes from Inheritance Tax

    52% of CLA members say they would be more willing to build and manage affordable homes for rent for local people if the value of the housing was conditionally exempt from Inheritance Tax while being let at an affordable rent.

  4. Enforce up-to-date Local Plans

    Between 30-40% of local authorities still do not have up-to-date adopted Local Plans to deliver much needed housing. Even those with adopted plans do not provide sufficient detail to drive the delivery of local housing in small rural settlements.

  5. Formalise the process for landowners to manage affordable homes

    Issues can arise when landowners want to build and manage affordable housing themselves. If the Government were to introduce a standard Section 106 agreement to allow this it would give local authorities greater confidence to grant planning consent.

Image: © With kind permission of Mike Vallender

Any views or opinions presented in the comments below are solely those of the author and do not represent those of OnTheWight.

Leave your Reply

7 Comments on "Potential of farmland still ignored in rural housing crisis, says CLA"

newest oldest most voted
Email updates?

Once the countryside is built on you’ll never get it back. Protect it.


Like all things, it is a matter of balance, if we don’t release land to build the houses our children need we will fail them. It is a question of what is appropriate for each area. All of us living in a house or flat lives on land which was once countryside.


-18 impressive, you don’t want your children to have homes then…………….


“Rural Landowners Want To Cash In And Sell Off Land For Housing”

Quelle Surprise.


Why do we need to build more houses when there are so many unoccupied ?


May I suggest somewhere like Hulverstone or Mottistone they seem so empty and rather dull. I’m sure the few locals that life there would be grateful for the diversity a small to medium sized estate (80 to 150 affordable houses) can bring such areas. I for one can only see benefits that bringing people especially from other cultures and a range of wealths would bring.


Why do we need so many houses?
Oh was that to house the 3,500,000 immigrants that LIAR T BLiar brought in to “Rub the Rights Face in Diversity” or is it the Tens of thousands that have been let in since idiot Gordon Brown was in office, or David Cameron and now Treason May.
We don’t need the housing if we CLOSE THE DOOR